Mobil destekli dil öğreniminin yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğrenenlerin eşdizimsel sözcük öğrenimine etkisi

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenenlerin kelime bilgisi geliştirmelerinde mobil bir uygulamanın etkililiğini belirlemektir. Bu çalışma, deney ve kontrol gruplarından oluşan yarı deneysel araştırma yöntemini benimsemiştir. Çalışmanın örneklemi, Türkiye'deki iki devlet üniversitesinde okuyan toplam 73 dil öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. 14 hafta süren uygulama sırasında, deney grubu araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen bir mobil uygulama olan CollocatApp üzerinden 40 eşdizimsel sözcük öğrenmeye çalışırken, kontrol grubu aynı amaç için çalışma kağıtları kullanmıştır. Veriler, Wesche ve Paribakht (1996) tarafından geliştirilen Kelime Bilgisi Ölçeği (KBÖ) ve araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen Eşdizimsel sözcük Başarı Testi (EBT) ile toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerin alıcı kelime bilgisini ölçmek için EBT kullanılırken üretken kelime bilgisini test etmek için KBÖ kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, deney grubu ile kontrol grubu arasında son testteki alıcı kelime bilgisi açısından anlamlı bir fark olduğunu göstermiştir. Öte yandan, kalıcılık testlerinde gruplar arasında fark bulgulanmamıştır. Üretken kelime bilgisi açısından mobil uygulamaların ve çalışma kağıtlarının kullanımı arasında fark olmadığı görülmüştür. Böylece, mobil uygulamaların dil öğreniminde kullanımının sadece kısa süreli bellek için ve alıcı kelime bilgisini geliştirmede etkili bir yolu olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL learners’ collocation learning

The aim of this study was to identify the effectiveness of a mobile application in vocabulary knowledgeimprovement of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. This study adopted a quasi-experimental researchdesign consisting of an experimental and a control group with 73 participants studying at two state universities inTurkey. During the application that lasted for 14 weeks, the experimental group tried to learn 40 collocations viaCollocatApp, while control group used worksheets. The data were gathered through Collocation Achievement Test(CAT) developed by the researchers and Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS) (Wesche & Paribakht, 1996). CATwas used for measuring receptive vocabulary knowledge of learners, and VKS was used for testing productivevocabulary knowledge. The findings showed that there was a significant difference between the experimentalgroup and control group in terms of receptive vocabulary knowledge in the post-test. However, there was nodifference between groups in retention tests. At the dimension of productive vocabulary knowledge, it was seenthat there was no difference between the use of mobile applications and worksheets in terms of productivevocabulary knowledge. Thus, it was concluded that using mobile applications was an effective way of improvingvocabulary knowledge receptively for only short-term memory.© 2020 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS.

___

  • Ağca, R. K., & Özdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 781–785. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.147
  • Alemi, M., Sarab, M., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6), 99–109. https//doi.org/: 10.5539/ies.v5n6p99
  • Azar, A. S., & Nasiri, H. (2014). Learners’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in L2 listening comprehension. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1836-1843. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.613
  • Bárcena, E. et al. (2015). State of the art of language learning design using mobile technology: Sample apps and some critical reflection. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, (pp. 36-43). Dublin: Researchpublishing.net. https//doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000307
  • Başoğlu, E., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1–7. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898010
  • Bornstein, A. (n.d.). Memorizing vocabulary and languages. VideoJug, Retrieved from http://www.videojug.com/interview/memorizing-vocabulary-and-languages.
  • Bruton, A. (2009). The Vocabulary Knowledge Scale: A critical analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6, 288-297. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15434300902801909?journalCode=hlaq20
  • Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https//doi.org/ 10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Çavuş, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91. https//doi.org/10.1111/j.14678535.2007.00801.x
  • Deng, H., & Shao, Y. (2011). Self-directed English vocabulary learning with a mobile application in everyday context. 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning: mLearn 2011 Conference Proceedings, China, 24-31.
  • Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A. D., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K. A., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52(2), 187-201. Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/tpr/vol52/iss2/5/
  • Hayati, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Using Short Message Service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 66-81. https//doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01260.x
  • Hu, Z. (2013). Vocabulary learning assisted by mobile phones: Perceptions of Chinese adult learners. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 8(1), 139 – 154. https//doi.org/10.17863/CAM.1468.
  • Huang, Y-M., Huang, Y-M., Huang, S-H. & Lin Y-T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58, 273-282. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008
  • Hubbard, P. (Ed.) (2009). Computer-assisted Language Learning: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, Volumes I-IV. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Jee, M. J. (2011). Web 2.0 technology meets Mobile Assisted Language Learning. The IALLT Journal, 41(1), 161-175. Retrieved from http://ialltjournal.org/index.php/ialltjournal/article/view/127
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of Mobile Assisted Language Learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289. https//doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
  • Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54 (3), 399-436. https//doi.org/10.1111/j.0023- 8333.2004.00260.x
  • Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and Conceptualisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liu, P. L., & Chen, C-J. (2014). Learning English through actions: A study of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 158-17. https//doi.org/ 10.1080/10494820.2014.959976
  • Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525. https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x
  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). USA: Pearson.
  • Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309-319. https//doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126
  • Nino, A. (2015). Language learners’ perceptions and experiences on the use of mobile applications for independent language learning in higher education. The IAFOR Journal of Education, Technologies & Education Special Edition, 73-84. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1100623.pdf
  • O'Dell, F., & McCarthy, M. (2008). English collocations in use: Advanced. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., & Sharples, M. (2005). Guidelines for learning/teaching/ tutoring in a mobile environment. Retrieved from http://www.mobilearn.org/download/results/public_deliverables/MOBIlearn_D4.1_Final.pdf
  • Polakova, P. & Klimova, B. (2019). Mobile technology and generation z in the English language classroom: A preliminary study. Education Sciences, 9(3), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030203.
  • Rahimi, M., & Miri, S. S. (2014). The impact of mobile dictionary use on language learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1469–1474. https//doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.567
  • Rezaei, A., Mai, N., & Pesaranghader, A. (2014). The effect of mobile applications on English vocabulary acquisition. Jurnal Teknologi, 68(2), 73–83. https//doi.org/:10.11113/jt.v68.2912
  • Rodríguez-Arancón, P., Arús, J., & Calle-Martínez, C. (2013). The use of current mobile applications in EFL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1189-1196. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.446.
  • Saran, M., Seferoglu, G., & Cagiltay, K. (2012). Mobile language learning: Contribution of multimedia messages via mobile phones in consolidating vocabulary. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 181–190. Retrieved from https://web.b.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&j rnl=01195646&AN=74731081&h=SGYe6I7Ov2ZoPQTvSBfJgTaGTQFdzsDWVayQExfAho8z0 %2fr4T3FCs6EWXLRQIn2A2xuJVx2bk4MDQHfh1sEyVg%3d%3d&crl=f&resultNs=AdminWe bAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost %26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d01195646%26AN%3d74731081 Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48, 281-317. https//doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00042
  • Schmitt. N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64 (4), 913–951. https//doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077
  • Seçer, İ. (2013). SPSS ve LISREL ile pratik veri analizi: Analiz ve raporlaştırma. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Soleimani, E., İsmail, K., & Mustaffa, R. (2014). The acceptance of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) among postgraduate ESL students in UKM. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 457-462. https//doi.org/:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.062
  • Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2005). Integrating m-technology into Web-based ESL vocabulary learning for working adult learners. Paper presented at Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Tokushima.
  • Steel, C. (2012). Fitting learning into life: Language students' perspectives on benefits of using mobile apps. In Brown, M. Hartnett, M. and Stewart, T. (Eds.) Future challenges, sustainable futures (pp. 875-880). Proceedings Ascilite Welllington.
  • Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone based vocabulary tutor. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365–383. https//doi.org/10.1080/09588220701745817
  • Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning &Technology, 14(2), 95-110. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ895975
  • Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 21(3), 217–228. https//doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x
  • Titova, S., & Samoylenko, O. (2017). An enquiry-based approach to develop language skills in mobilesupported classrooms. Journal of Language and Education, 3(3), 39-49. https//doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-3-39-49.
  • Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 79-95. https//doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080042
  • Wesche, M., & Paribakht, S. T. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13–40.
  • Wu, Q. (2015). Pulling mobile assisted language learning (MALL) into the mainstream: MALL in broad practice. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–12. https//doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128762.
  • Yurdagül, C. & Öz, S. (2018). Attitudes towards mobile learning in English language education. Education Sciences, 8(3), 142-156. https//doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030142.
  • Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203–214. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ944968.pdf
Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-578X
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: http://www.jlls.org