Intrinsic Difficulties in Learning Common Greek-Originated English Words: The Case of Pluralization

Bir dilin kökeni hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak, o dilin tarihi arka planı hakkında saptamalar yapmamıza yardımcı olmaktadır. Toplumsal bir sistem olarak dil, bağlı olduğu toplum, teknolojik değişimlere uğradığı ve öğrendiği sürece, sürekli olarak gelişime açık yapıdadır. Diğer tüm diller gibi, İngilizce de birçok farklı dilden kökensel olarak etkilenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, kökeni Anglo-Saksonlara dayanan İngilizce'deki çoğu kelimenin kökeninin, modern kültür yapısından oldukça etkilendiği Latin ve Yunan dillerine dayandığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmada, bu şekilde türetilen kelimelere ve Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce öğrenenlerin bu kelimeleri öğrenmede karşılaşılan yapısal güçlüklere değinilmiştir. Özel ilgi alanı olarak da, bu kelimelerin çoğullaştırma sorunsalı belirlenmiştir. Bu nedenle, bu makalenin yazarı İngilizce'nin tarihsel gelişim sürecini ve kökenbilimsel temellerini dilbilimsel bakış açısıyla ele almıştır. Sonuç olarak, yaygın olarak kullanımda olan ve çoğullaştırmada sorun teşkil eden Yunanca kökenli kelimeler ve bu kelimelerin çoğul yapılarının öğrenilmesinde yaşanılan yapısal güçlüklere birtakım çözüm önerileri getirilmiştir.

Yaygın Olarak Kullanılan Yunanca Kökenli İngilizce Kelimelerin Öğreniminde Karşılaşılan Yapısal Güçlükler: Çoğullaştırma Sorunsalı

Knowing the origin of a language helps us to determine the historical background of that language. As language itself is such a system of a society that is continuously evolving as that aforementioned society learns and technologically develops along with its roots or origins. Like many other languages, English is also a language that has roots or origins in many different languages. In this sense, the English language, rooted as Anglo-Saxon, is known to derive most of its words from the Latin and Greek languages by whose modern cultures, it is assumed to be affected most. In this study, this derivation of words and the intrinsic difficulties probable to occur for English as a Foreign Language learners (hereafter EFLs) with a special interest upon the case of pluralization are scrutinized. That is why it is enlightened by the author of this paper within the scope of the historical background, the etymology of the English language within a linguistic perspective. As a result, the most common and confusing plural forms of Greek-originated English words, and some curing methods are defined. © 2015 JLLS and the Authors - Published by JLLS

___

  • Acton, W. (1984). Changing fossilized pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 71-85.
  • Alms, A. (2007). Theology, trauerspiel, and the conceptual foundations of early German opera. City University: New York.
  • Bach, K. (2001). Semantically speaking. In I. Kenesei & R. M. Harnish (Eds..), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse: A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer (pp. 147-166). John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam.
  • Bailey, G. (1997). When did southern American English begin. In E.W. Schneider (Ed.) Englishes around the world (pp. 255-275). John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam.
  • Bergs, A., & Brinton, L. J. (2012). English historical linguistics: An international handbook (2nd volume). Water de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG: Berlin.
  • Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
  • Bréal, M. (1990). Chambers biographical dictionary: 5e. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Brinton, L. J., & Arnovick, L. K. (2006). The English language: A linguistic history. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Correli, L. (n.d.). Brief etymological background of the English word stock. Retrieved February 14, 2016 from http://www.omniglot.com/language/articles/etymology.htm.
  • Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Condry, S.M. (1979). A developmental study of processes of word derivation in elementary school children and their relation to reading. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Cornell University.
  • Corson, D. J. (1985). The lexical bar. Pergamon Press: Oxford.
  • Critten, S., Connelly, V., Dockrell, J., & Walter, K. (2014). Inflectional and derivational morphological spelling abilities of children with Specific Language Impairment, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 948.
  • Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Dash, N. S. (n.d.). The art of lexicography. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from http://www.eolss.net/Sample- Chapters/C04/E6-91- 16.pdf.
  • Davletbaeva, D. N. (2010). The course of lectures on lexicology in English. [Published Thesis]. Tatar State University of Humanities and Education, Kazan.
  • Demirezen, M. (2003). İngilizce'nin theta sesbiriminin (peltek-t) Türkler için çıkardığı sesletim sorunları,. TÖMER Dil Dergisi, 120, 57-71.
  • Demirezen, M. (2004). İngilizcenin peltek-d (eth) sesbiriminin Türkler için çıkardığı sesletim sorunları ve çözümler. Journal of Arts and Sciences, 1(1), 7-22.
  • Demirezen, M. (2010). The principles and applications of the audio-lingual pronunciation rehabilitation model in foreign language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 127-147.
  • Derwing, B.L., & Baker, W.J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In P. Fletcher & M. Garmen (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • Doroszewski, W. (1973). Elements of lexicology and semiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Fischer, O., & van der Wurff, W. (2006). Chapter 3: Syntax. In D. Denison & R. M. Hogg (Eds.) A history of the English language (pp. 109-198). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Frazer, G. (1921). (Pseudo-)Apollodorus (with an English translation in two volumes). Harvard University Press: London.
  • Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
  • Ginzburg, R. S., Khidekel, S.S., Knyazeva, G.Y., & Sankin, A.A. (1979). A course in Modern English lexicography (2nd edition). High School Publishing House.
  • Hard, R. (2008). The Routledge handbook of Greek mythology: based on H.J. Rose's Handbook of Greek mythology. Taylor and Francis Ltd: London.
  • Honour, H. (1968). Neo-classicism: Style and civilization. Penguin Books.
  • Irwin, D. (1997). Neoclassicism A&I (art and ideas). Phaidon Press.
  • Kemmer, S. (2003). Schemas and lexical blends. In T. Berg et al. (Eds.) Motivation in Language: From Case Grammar to Cognitive Linguistics: A festschrift for Günter Radden (pp. 69-97). John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam.
  • Kirby, J.R., Deacon, S.H., Bowers, P.N., Izenberg, L. Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children's morphological awareness and reading ability. Read Writ, 25, 389-410.
  • Konstantinidis, A. (2006). The universal reach of the Greek language. Athens: self-published.
  • Krill, R. M. (1990). Greek and Latin in English today. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers: U.S.
  • Lass, R. (1992). Phonology and morphology. In N. Blake (Ed.) Cambridge History of the English Language-II: 1066-1476 (pp. 103-123). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Lawrence, J.M. (2008). Differences in morphological awareness skills between children with phonological impairment and children with typical development. [Published doctoral dissertation]. Florida State University, College of Communication: U.S.
  • Malkiel, Y. (1967). A typological classification of dictionaries on the basis of distinctive features. In F.W. Householder & S. Saporta (Eds.) Problems in lexicography (pp. 3-24). The Hague: Mouton.
  • Marchand, S. L. (1992) Archaeology and cultural politics in Germany, 1800-1965: The decline of Philhellenism. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
  • Mazlish, B. (2004). Civilization and its contents. Stanford University Press: CA.
  • McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R.K., Muse, A., Chow, B. W.-Y., & Shu, H. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415-435.
  • Mey, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.
  • Myres, J. (1953). Herodotus, Father of history. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
  • Nielsen, D.C., Luetke, B., & Stryker, D. (2011). The importance of morphemic awareness to reading achievement and the potential of signing morphemes to supporting reading development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1-14.
  • Norlin, G. (1980). Isocrates (with an English translation in three volumes). Harvard University Press: London.
  • Pécout, G. (2004). Philhellenism in Italy: political friendship and the Italian volunteers in the Mediterranean in the nineteenth century, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 9(4), 405-427.
  • Roberts, A. H. (1965). A Statistical Linguistic analysis of American English. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Romaine, S. (1999). Chapter 1: Introduction. In S. Romaine (Ed.) Cambridge History of the English Language- IV: 1776-1997 (pp. 1-56). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Selby, S. (1972). The development of morphological rules in children. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 293-299. Shaozhong, L. (2005). What is pragmatics? Retrieved January 18, 2016 from http://www.gxnu.edu.cn/Personal/szliu/definition.html.
  • Shepherd, J.R. (1973). The relations between knowledge of word parts and knowledge of derivatives among college freshmen. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. New York University.
  • Skeat, W. W. (2005). A concise etymological dictionary of the English language: List of doublets. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
  • Sternberg, R., & Powell, J. (1983). Comprehending verbal comprehension. American Psychologist, 38, 878-893.
  • Svartvik, J., & Leech, G. (2006). English- one tongue, many voices. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thornbury, S. (2005). Uncovering grammar: How to help grammar emerge. MacMillan Education: Oxford.
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1941). The teaching of English suffixes. Columbia University Publishing: Columbia.
  • Toller, T. N. (1921). An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Supplement. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-67.
  • Toon, T. E. (1992). Old English dialects. In R. M. Hogg (Ed.) The Cambridge history of the English language. 1: The beginnings to 1066. (pp. 409-501). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to Sociolinguistics. (Blackwell textbooks in Linguistics- 6th edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Windsor, J. (1994). Children's comprehension and production of derivational suffixes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(2), 408-417.
  • Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66-81.
  • Zgusta, L. (1973). Lexicology, generating words. In R.I. McDavid & A.R. Duckert (Eds.) Lexicography in English (pp. 14-28). Academy of Sciences: New York.
  • https://www.englishclub.com/english-language-history.htm.
  • http://www.enhancemyvocabulary.com/word-roots_greek.html.