GERİATRİK HASTALARDA AKUT KARIN NEDENLERİ, ACİL CERRAHİ GİRİŞİM ENDİKASYONLARI VE POSTOPERATİF KOMPLİKASYONLARLA CHARLSON KOMORBİDİTE İNDEKSİ İLİŞKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Giriş: Bu çalışmada geriatrik hasta grubunda akut karına yol açan nedenlerin, acil cerrahi girişim endikasyonlarının belirlenmesi ve Charlson Komorbidite indeksi skoru ile postoperatif komplikasyon gelişimi arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya Ocak 2016-Aralık 2016 tarihleri arasında, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hastanesi Acil Servisi’ne, travmatik olmayan akut karın ağrısı şikayeti ile başvuran ve genel cerrahi servisine yatışı yapılan 65 yaş ve üzeri hastalar alındı. Hastalar cinsiyet, yaş, karın ağrısı etiyolojisi, eşlik eden hastalıklar, radyolojik tanı yöntemi, CKİ skoru, uygulanan tedavi yöntemleri (medikal/cerrahi), uygulanan cerrahi girişim tipi bakımından değerlendirmeye alındı. Cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastalarda CKİ skorunun prognozla ilişkisi araştırıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 128(%53.1)’i erkek, 113(%46.9) kadın olmak üzere 241 hasta alındı. Hastaların ortanca yaşı 74(65-92)’tü. Akut karına yol açan en sık patolojiler sırasıyla; 106(%43.9)ileus, 53(%21.9)akut kolesistit ve 35(%14.5) akut apandisitti. Doksan bir (%37.8) hastaya cerrahi müdahale yapıldı. Toplamda 9(%3.7) hastada mortalite gelişti. Cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların 13(%14.3)’ünde morbidite, 4(%4.4)’ünde mortalite gelişti. Bu hastalar CKİ skoruna göre değerlendirildiğinde CKİ≥5 olan 37 hastanın 9(%24.3)’unda komplikasyon geliştiği saptandı (p=0.023) ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı. Sonuç: Geriatrik hastalarda akut karın nedenleri genç hastalara kıyasla farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu olgularda tanı konulması da nispeten daha zordur. Geriatrik hastalarda acil cerrahi girişim gerektiren patolojiler benzerdir ve postoperatif prognozu belirlemede CKİ skoru faydalı bir araç olarak kullanılabilir.

CAUSES OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN, INDICATIONS OF URGENT SURGERY IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS AND ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AND CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX

Introduction: In this study, we aim to demonstrate the indications of emergency surgery for diseases causing acute abdomen in geriatric population and examine the relationship between Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score and occurence of post operative complications. Materials and Method: We included patients aged 65 or older who applied to Dokuz Eylul University Hospital Emergency Department with non-traumatic acute abdomen signs and transferred to general surgery department in-patient unit. Patients are grouped regarding age, gender, etiology of abdominal pain, concommitant disease, diagnostic radiologic method, CCI score, method of treatment (surgical/medical), type of surgical intervention. We examined the relationship between CCI score and prognosis in surgically treated patients. Results: We included total of 241 patients, 128 males (%53.1) and 113 females (46.9%). Median age of the patients are calculated as 74 (65-92). The most common diseases causing acute abdominal pain are ileus (106, 43.9%) acute cholecystitis (53, 21.9%) and acute appendicitis (35, 14%) respectively. Ninetyone (37.8%) patients are treated with surgical interventions. In total 9(3.7%) patients were deceased. In patients treated surgically, 13 (14.3%) morbidity and 4 (4.4%) mortality occured. When compared in terms of CCI score, 9(24.3%) of 37 patients whose CCI≥5 were developed postoperative complications (p=0.023) and it was statistically significant. Conclusion: The etiology of acute abdominal pain differs in geriatric patients when compared to general population. In these patients, diagnosis is relatively difficult. In geriatric patients, diseases that require surgical intervention are grossly similar and CCI score can be used to predict the prognosis in these kind of patients.

___

  • 1. Spangler R, Van Pham T, Khoujah D, Martinez JP. Abdominal emergencies in the geriatric patient. Int J Emerg Med. 2014;(7):43.
  • 2. Lewis LM, Banet GA, BlandaM, Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Gerson LW. Etiology and clinical course of abdominal pain in senior patients: a prospective, multicenter study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60(8): 1071–6.
  • 3. McNamara RM, Rousseau E, Sanders AB. Geriatric emergency medicine: a survey of practicing emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21(7): 796–801.
  • 4. Leuthauser A, McVane B. Abdominal Pain in the Geriatric Patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2016; 34(2): 363-75.
  • 5. Yeh EL, Mc Namara RM. Abdominal pain. Clin Geriatr Med 2007; 23(2): 255–70.
  • 6. Styrud J, Eriksson S. Acute appendicitis in the elderly. An analysis of 47 patients over 80 years of age. Int J Surg Investig 1999; 1(4): 297–300.
  • 7. Storm-Dickerson TL, Horattas MC. What have we learned over the past 20 years about appendicitis in the elderly? Am J Surg 2003; 185(3): 198–201.
  • 8. Samaras N, Chevalley T, Samaras D, Gold G. Older patients in the emergency department: a review. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56(3): 261–9.
  • 9. Martinez JP, Mattu A. Abdominal pain in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2006; 24(2): 371–88.
  • 10. Lunca S, Bouras G, Romedea NS. Acute appendicitis in the elderly patient: diagnostic problems, prognostic factors and outcomes.Rom J Gastroenterol 2004; 13:299–303.
  • 11. Freund HR, Rubinstein E. Appendicitis in the aged. Is it really different? Am Surg 1984; 50(10): 573–6.
  • 12. Millet I, Sebbane M, Molinari N, Pages-Bouic E, Curros-Doyon F, Riou B et al. Systematic unenhanced CT for acute abdominal symptoms in the elderly patients improves both emergency department diagnosis and prompt clinical management. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(2): 868-77.
  • 13. Fenyo G. Acute abdominal disease in the elderly: experience from two series in Stockholm. Am J Surg 1982, 143(6):751–4.
  • 14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5): 373-83.
  • 15. de Dombal FT. Acute abdominal pain in the elderly. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994; 19(4): 331–5.
  • 16. Brewer BJ, Golden GT, Hitch DC, Rudolf LE, Wangensteen SL. Abdominal pain. An analysis of 1,000 consecutive cases in a University hospital emergency room. Am J Surg 1976; 131(2): 219–23.
  • 17. Bugliosi TF, Meloy TD, Vukov LF. Acute abdominal pain inthe elderly. Ann Emerg Med 1990;(19):1383–6.
  • 18. Hendrickson M, Naparst TR. Abdominal surgical emergencies in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2003; 21(4): 937–69.
  • 19. van Geloven AA, Biesheuvel TH, Luitse JS, Hoitsma HF, Obertop H. Hospital admissions of patients aged over 80 with acute abdominal complaints. Eur J Surg 2000;166:866–71.
  • 20. Davis P, Hayden J, Springer J, Bailey J, Molinari M, Johnson P. Prognostic factors for morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing acute gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2014; 57(2): E44–52.
  • 21. Laurell H, Hansson L-E, Gunnarsson U. Acute abdominal pain among elderly patients. Gerontology 2006; 52(6): 339–44.
  • 22. Arenal JJ, Bengoechea-Beeby M. Mortality associated with emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Can J Surg 2003; 46(2): 111–6.
  • 23. Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ. Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 2002;225(1):159–64.
  • 24. Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology 2009; 253(1): 31–46.
  • 25. Shuman WP, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, Bree RL, DiSantis DJ, Glick SN, et al. Imaging evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain and fever. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 2000; 215(Suppl):209–12.
  • 26. Ng CS, Watson CJ, Palmer CR, See TC, Beharry NA, Housden BA,et al. Evaluation of early abdominopelvic computed tomography in patients with acute abdominal pain of unknown cause: prospective randomised study. BMJ 2002; 325(7377):1387.
  • 27. Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V. Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174(5):1391–6.
  • 28. Rosen MP, Siewert B, Sands DZ, Bromberg R, Edlow J,Raptopoulos V. Value of abdominal CT in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 2003; 13(2): 418–24.
  • 29. Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, McMahon PM, Binder W, Novellin RA, Gazelle GS et al. Abdominopelvic CT increases diagnostic certainty and guides management decisions: A prospective investigation of 584 patients in a large academic medical center. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(2): 238–43.
  • 30. Esses D, Birnbaum A, Bijur P, Shah S, Gleyzer A, Gallagher EJ. Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2004; 22(4): 270–2.
  • 31. Lewis LM, Klippel AP, Bavolek RA, Ross LM, Scherer TM, Banet GA. Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol 2007; 61(2): 290–6.
  • 32. Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Banet GA, Gerson LW, BlandaM, Lewis LM. The use of abdominal computed tomography in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23(3): 259–65.
  • 33. Marco CA, Schoenfeld CN, Keyl PM, Menkes ED, Doehring MC. Abdominal pain in geriatric emergency patients: variables associated with adverse outcomes. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:1163–8.
  • 34. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Georgen SK, Byrnes GB, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013; 346:f2360.
  • 35. Salibi PN, Agarwal V, Panczykowski DM, PuccioAM, SheetzMA, Okonkwo DO. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer from CT among patients surviving severe traumatic brain injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202(2): 397–400.
  • 36. McCunney RJ, Li J. Radiation risks in lung cancer screening programs: a comparison with nuclear industry workers and atomic bomb survivors. Chest 2014; 145(3): 618–24.
  • 37. Doss M. No increased risk of cancer from CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202(4): W410.
  • 38. Kiatpongsan S, Meng L, Eisenberg JD, Herring M, Avery LL, Kong CY et al. Imaging for appendicitis: should radiationinduced cancer risks affect modality selection? Radiology 2014; 273(2): 472–82.
  • 39. Moos SI, vanVemde DN, Stoker J, Bipat S. Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82(9):e387–e399.
  • 40. Huang MK, Hsu TF, Chiu YH, Chiang SC, Kao WF, Yen DH et al. Risk factors for acute kidney injury in the elderly undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the emergency department. J Chin Med Assoc 2013; 76(5): 271–6.
  • 41. Hassen GW, Hwang A, Liu LL, Mualim F, Sembo T, Tu TJ et al. Follow up for emergency department patients after intravenous contrast and risk of nephropathy. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15(3): 276–81.
  • 42. Hlibczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast Computed Tomography for Appendicitis in Adults: A Systematic Review. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 55(1): 51–9.e1.
  • 43. Agarwal MD, Levenson RB, Siewert B, Camacho MA, Raptopoulos V. Limited added utility of performing follow-up contrastenhanced CT in patients undergoing initial non-enhanced CT for evaluation of flank pain in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 2014; 22(2): 109–15.
  • 44. Tack D, Bohy P, Perlot I, De Martealer V, Alkeilani O, Sourtzis S et al. Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imagingwith low-dose unenhancedmulti-detector rowCT. Radiology 2005; 237(1): 189–96.
  • 45. MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT, Claypool HA, Keenan S, Katz DS et al. Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CTcompared with threeview acute abdominal series. Radiology 2005; 237(1): 114–22.
  • 46. Basak S, Nazarian LN,Wechsler RJ, Parker L, Williams BD, Lev-Toaff AS et al. Is unenhanced CT sufficient for evaluation of acute abdominal pain? Clin Imaging 2002; 26(6): 405–7.
  • 47. Gardner CS, Jaffe TA, Nelson RC. Impact of CT in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(7): 2877-82.
  • 48. Millet I, Alili C, Bouic-Pages E, Curros-Doyon F, Nagot N, Taourel P. Journal club: Acute abdominal pain in elderly patients: effect of radiologist awareness of clinicobiologic information on CT accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201(6): 1171-8.
  • 49. Bedirli A. Factors effecting the complications in the natural history of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48(41):1275–8.
  • 50. Carrascosa MF, Salcines-Caviedes JR: Emphysematous cholecystitis. CMAJ 2012; 184:E81.
  • 51. Omari AH, Khammash MR, Qasaimeh GR, Shammari AK, Yaseen MKB, Hammori SK. Acute appendicitis in the elderly: risk factors for perforation. World J Emerg Surg 2014; 9(1): 6.
  • 52. Kauvar DR: The geriatric acute abdomen. Clin Geriatr Med 1993; 9(3): 547–58.
  • 53. Gupta H, Dupuy D. Abdominal emergencies: has anything changed? Surg Clin N Am 1997; 77(6): 1245–64.
  • 54. Shoji BT, Becker JM. Colorectal disease in the elderly patient. Surg Clin N Am 1994; 74(2): 293–316.
  • 55. Huntley AL, Johnson R, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Salisbury C. Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide. Anna Fam Med 2012; 10(2): 134–41.
İzmir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-5151
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

GERİATRİK HASTALARDA AKUT KARIN NEDENLERİ, ACİL CERRAHİ GİRİŞİM ENDİKASYONLARI VE POSTOPERATİF KOMPLİKASYONLARLA CHARLSON KOMORBİDİTE İNDEKSİ İLİŞKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

TUFAN EGELİ, Serhan DERİCİ, Cihan AĞALAR, Süleyman Özkan AKSOY, Tayfun BİŞGİN, Ali CEVLİK, Mücahit ÖZBİLGİN, Başak BAYRAM, Aras Emre CANDA

İLAÇ SALINIMLI STENT İMPLANTE EDİLEN HASTALARDA STENT TİPİ İLE TAKİPTE GELİŞEN KARDİYAK ADVERS OLAYLARIN ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Mustafa Aytek ŞİMŞEK, Nezihi BARIŞ, Özgür ASLAN, Sema GÜNERİ

ORTA-İLERİ DÜZEY DİYABETİK AYAK ENFEKSİYONLARINDA MİKROBİYOLOJİK SPEKTRUM VE ANTİBİYOTİK DİRENÇ ORANLARI

Ercan YENİLMEZ, Elif UYSAL

TALASEMİ MAJÖR VE İNTERMEDİA HASTALARINDA HBS1L-MYB RS4895441 GEN POLİMORFİZMİNİN KLİNİĞE ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Özgür CARTI, Yöntem YAMAN, Gülcihan ÖZEK, Hüseyin ONAY, Berna ATABAY, Canan VERGİN

EKSTAZİ İLE İLİŞKİLİ BİLATERAL BAZAL GANGLİON HEMORAJİSİ

Pınar TAMER, Burçin DURMUŞ, Muhteşem GEDİZLİOĞLU

LUMBOSAKRAL SİYATALJİ İÇİN TEK VE ÇOKLU DOZ KAUDAL EPİDURAL STEROİD ENJEKSİYONLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Füsun ÖZER, Meryem Merve ÖREN, Mahmut ÇAMLAR, Mustafa Eren YÜNCÜ, Çağlar TÜRK, Ali KARADAĞ, Sean MOEN

COMPARISON OF THE SINGLE AND THE MULTIPLE DOSE CAUDAL EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTIONS FOR LUMBOSACRAL SCIATICA

Mahmut ÇAMLAR, Mustafa Eren YÜNCÜ, Ali KARADAĞ, Sean MOEN, Meryem Merve ÖREN, Çağlar TÜRK, Füsun ÖZER

YAŞLI KALÇA KIRIKLARINDA HEMİARTROPLASTİ CERRAHİSİ SONRASI DREN YERİNDEN OLUŞAN SIZINTININ MİKROBİYOLOJİK VE BİYOKİMYASAL ANALİZİ, BİR ÖNCÜL ÇALIŞMA

Umut CANBEK, Ulaş AKGÜN, Nevres Hürriyet AYDOĞAN

DOES VASECTOMY AFFECT ERECTILE FUNCTIONS AND QUALITY OF LIFE?

Güner YILDIZ, Yüksel YILMAZ

RANDOM VE AFEREZ TROMBOSİT TRANSFÜZYONUNUN PFA-200 TESTİYLE TROMBOSİT FONKSİYONLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Mehmet Can UĞUR, Harun AKAR, Fatma Demet ARSLAN, Cengiz CEYLAN