Yenilikçi Davranışı ve Çalışanların Adalet Algıları Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bankacılık Sektöründe Yapılan Bir Çalışma

Günümüzde teknolojinin hızlı gelişimi, örgütlerin stratejilerini de önemli derecede etkilemiştir. Teknolojik gelişmelere paralel olarak örgütlerin gelişmeye açık olmaları zorunluluk haline gelmiştir. Bu gelişmeler doğrultusunda örgütte yer alan bireylerin davranışlarında da önemli değişiklikler gözlenmektedir. Bu değişikliklerden biri de işyerindeki yenilikçi iş davranışının ortaya çıkmasıdır. Örgütlerin önem vermesi gereken bir diğer konu ise çalışanların adalet algılamalarıdır. Çalışanlar örgüt içinde görevlerini yerine getirirken karşılığında bazı beklentilerin gerçekleştirilmesini isterler. Çalışanların beklentilerinin, yani çaba-ödül beklentileri, örgüt tarafından karşılanırken adaletli davranılması, çalışanlar açısmdan dikkat edilen bir konudur. Adaletli davranılması birey açısmdan ne kadar önemliyse, örgüt veya grup tarafından da aynı derecede önem taşımaktadır. Adalet algıları tatmin edilen çalışanlar, ağır işyükünün üstesinden gelmek için daha istekli hale gelmektedirler. Böylece işyerindeki sorunları çözmeye ve yenilikçi iş davranışlarında bulunmaya istekli olmaktadırlar.Bu düşünceler ışığında yapılan araştırma aşağıda sunulmuştur. Araştırmanın ilk bölümünde literatürde bulunan adalet algılan ve yenilikçi iş davranışı ile ilgili çalışma ve bulgulara yer verilmiştir. İkinci bölümde ise araştırmanın metodolojisi üzerinde durulmuştur. Sonuç bölümünde ise araştırmanın sonuçları ve tartışmalar yer almaktadır.

A Study in Banking About the Relationship Between the Fairness Perceptions and the Innovative Work Behaviour

Nowadays, technological development affected importantly the strategies of the organizations. On account of the technological developments, it became an obligation to be accessible to development for the organization. Along with the technological developments, individual behaviors in an organization change day by day. One of these changes is innovative work behavior of the employee. One of the important point that the organizations has to consider is the fairness perceptions of the employees. When the employees worked in an organization, they want to be meeted their expectations. When expectations of the employees are meeted with some rewards by the managers in the organization; bemg fairness perceptions about the reward system became important for the employee.The employees whom the fairness perceptions were satisfied became more desirous to cope with the heavy workload. Thus; they are willingness to solve the problems about their job and are willingness for the innovative work behavior in their organization.In this concept, in the first part of the study, the definitions related to the innovative work behavior and the perceptions of fairness are included with literature review, hi the second part, information about the study method is given. Finally, the findings and discussions are given. The most important finding of the study is that is important for the employees to join the organizational processes and that increased behavior of taking responsisbility for gives some help for the innovative work behavior.

PDF

___

Adams, J.S. (1965), "Inequity in Social Exchange: In Advances", In Experimental Psychology, Vol.2, edited by L. Berkowitz, 267-299, New York, NY: Academic Pres
Alexander, S. ve Ruderman, M. (1987), "The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior", Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198
Bies.R. (1985), "Identifying principles of interactional justice: The case of corporate recruiting", Paper presented as part of the symposium "Moving beyond equity theory: New directions in research on justice in organizations", at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago.
Bies, R. J. ve Moag, J.S. (1986), "Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness", In RJ. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard & b.h. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiatiton in Organizations, Vol. 1:43-55, Greenwich, CT.JAI Pres.
Bies, R.J. ve Shapiro, D.L. (1988), "Voice and justification: The influence on procedural fairness judgements", Academy of Management Journal, 31:676-685.
Brockner, J.,Grover, S., Read, T. Ve DeWitt, R.L. (1992), "Layoffs, job insecurity and survivors: work effort: Evidence of an inverted of an inverted-U relationship", Academy of Management Journal. 35:413-425.
Brockner. J., Wiesenfeld. B.M. (1996), "An integravite framework for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effect of outcomes and procedures", Psychological Bulletin, 120:189-208.
Bunce, D ve West, M. (1994), "Changing work environments: Innovating coping responses to occupation stress", Work and Stress, 8,319-331.
Folger, R. (1986), "Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model", In H.W. Bierhoff, R.L. Cohen & J.Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in Social Relations: 145-162, New York: Plenum.
Folger,R. ve Konovsky, M.A. (1989), "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions", Academy of Management Journal, 32,115-130.
Gilliand S.W. (1993), "The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective", Academy of Management Review, 18 (4):694-734.
Gilliland, S. W. (1994), "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system". Journal of Applied Psychology, 79:691-701
Greenberg J. (1986), "Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations", Journal of Applied Psychology, 712:340-342.
Greenberg, J. (1990a), "Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice", Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111-157.
Greenberg, J. (1990b), "Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow", Journal of Management, 16 (2): 399-432.
Greenberg, J. (1993), "The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. Injustice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness", In Human Resources Management, edited by R. Cropanzano, 79-103, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
James K. Ve Cropanzano, R. ( 1990), "Focus of attention and locus of control as moderators of fraternal justice effects", Social Justice Research, 4 : 169-185.
Jannsen, O. (2000), "Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302, the British Psychological Society.
Kanter,R. (1998), "When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations", In B.M.Staw ve L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol.10, pp. 169- 211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Konovsky, M.A. ve Cropanzano, R. (1991), "The perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 698-707.
Konovsky. M.A. ve Pugh. D.D. (1994), "Citizenship and social exchange", Academy of Management Journal, 37,656-669.
Lee, J. (2001), "Leader-member Exchange, perceived organizational justice and cooperative commutation", Management Communication Quarterly, Vol.14, No.4, 574-589.
Leventhal, G.S. (1980), "What should be done with equity theory? In Social Exchange: Advances in theory and research", edited by K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg and R.H. Wills, 27-55, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Lind, E.A. ve Tyler, T. (1998) "The social Psychology of Procedural Justice", New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Lind E.A, Kanter, R. ve Early, P.C. (1990), "Voice, control and procedural justice: Instrumental ve non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (5): 952-959.
Lind, E.A. ve Lissak, R.L.(1985), "Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness jugdements", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 19-29.
Lind, E.A, Kray, L. ve Thompson, L. (1998), "The social contraction of injustice: Fairness judgements in response to own and others' infair treatment by authorities", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75:1-22.
Lindquist T.M. (1995), "Fairness as an antecedent to participative budgeting: Examining the effects of distributive justice, procedural justice and referent cognitions of satisfaction and performance", Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7 (Fall): 122-147.
Locke, EA ve Latham, G.P. (1990), "A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance", Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Me Farlin, D.B. ve Sweeney, P.D. (1992), "Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction wiyh personal and organizational outcomes", Academy of Management journal, 35,1626-637.
Moorman, R.H. (1991), "Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?", Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 8745-855.
Moorman, R.H. Blakely, G.L. ve Niehoff, B.P. (1998), "Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior?", Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351-357.
Naumann, S.E. ve Bennett, N. (2000), "A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of multilevel model", Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881-889.
Niehoff, B.P. ve Moorman, R.H. (1993), "Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior", Academy of Management journal, 36: 527-556.
Oldham, G.R. ve Cummings. A (1996), "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work". Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
Scminke, M, Ambrose, MX. ve Noel, T.W, (1997), "The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice", Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1190-207.
Scott, S.G. ve Bruce, R.A. (1994), "Determinants of innovation behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the work place". Academy of Management Journal, 37,580-607.
Thibaut, J. ve Walker, L. (1975), "Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis", Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trevino, L.K. (1992), "The social effect of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective", Academy of Management Review, 17: 647-676.
Tyler, T.R. ve Lind, E.A (1992), "A relational model of authority in groups", In M.P. Zanna (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.25: 115-191, San Diego: Academic Press.
Wentzel, K. (2002), "The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers' performance in a budget setting", Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 14, 247-271.
West, M.A ve Farr, J.L. (1989), "Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives", Social Behavior, 4,15-30.
Williams, S., Pitre, R. ve Zainuba, M. (2002), "Justice and citizenship behavior intensions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment", The Journal of Social Psychology, 142 (1): 33-44.
Woodman, R.W. Sawyer, J.E. ve Griffin, R.W. (1993), "Toward a theory of organizational creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 18,293-321.