Turkey's signature of the kyoto protocol

Türkiye, Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesine Mayıs 2004te taraf olmuştur. 2009 yılının Şubat ayında, yani Protokolün birinci döneminin sonuna yaklaşıldığında, Türkiye Kyoto Protokolüne de taraf olmuştur. Bu makalenin iki amacı vardır: öncelikle, Türkiyenin Kyoto Protokolünü görece geç onaylanmasının arkasında yatan etmenleri belirlemek, sonrasında da, Türkiyenin Kyoto Protokolüne yönelik izlemiş olduğu politikaların, uluslararası anlaşmaların devletler tarafından onanma süreçlerine ilişkin gözlemlenmiş nedenlerine ve teorik açıklamalara uygunluğunu tartışmaktır. Bu makalenin ampirik malzemeleri, Türkiyede iklim değişikliği politikası alanında etkin olan kimi aktörlerle yapılan görüşmelerden, ilgili bakanlıkların web sayfalarından, parlamento tartışmalarından ve Türk medyasından oluşmaktadır. Makale, Türkiyenin anlaşmayı uzunca bir süre imzalamaktan kaçınmasının ardında yatan temel kaygının, Protokolün ülke üzerinde algılanan ekonomik maliyetleri olduğunu tesbit ederken, Protokolün 2009da imzalamış olmasının en önemli nedenini, Türkiyenin Avrupa Birliği üyeliğinden beklentileri olarak belirlemiştir. Makale, son olarak uluslararası çevre anlaşmalarını açıklayan teorilerin esas olarak birbirini dışlayan değil, tamamlayan bir karakter göstermelerine karşın, kurumsalcı (institutionalist) teorinin Türkiyenin Kyoto Protokolünü imzalanması sürecini daha kapsamlı olarak açıklayabildiğini savunmaktadır

Türkiye nin kyoto protokolü nü imzalaması

In May 2004 Turkey became a party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In February 2009, in a time when the Protocol s first commitment period comes to an end, Turkey also became a party to the Kyoto Protocol. The aim of this article is twofold: first, to identify the diverse factors that lie behind Turkey s late ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, and second, to discuss in which way Turkey s case confirms theoretical explanations regarding ratifications of international agreements. The empirical material of this article consist of interviews with some of the prevailing actors in the climate change policy area in Turkey, websites of the relevant ministries, parliamentary discussions, and the media. The article shows that while the perceived economic cost of the Protocol was the most important reason for Turkey to refrain signing it until 2009, the expected profit of the European Union membership appears as being the single most important cause for Turkey s change of position. The article agrees that although the theories of international environmental agreements are complementary rather than mutually exclusive it nevertheless contends that the institutionalist theory offers a more encompassing explanation as to why Turkey has joined the Kyoto Protocol.

___

  • - http://www.unep.org/law/PDF/register_Int_treaties_contents.pdf
  • - Yamin, Farhana and Depledge, Joanna (2004), The International Climate Change Regime, Cambridge University Press: UK, p. 8.
  • - OECD (2010). Economic survey: Turkey. http://www.oecd.org/document/26/0,3 746,en_2649_34111_45958682_1
  • - http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC.
  • - FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.4, Decision 26/CP.7, Amendment to the list in Annex II to the Convention in Marrakech.
  • - Mitchell, Ronald B. (2002), “International Environment” in Handbook of International Relations, Thomas Risse, Beth Simmons and Walter Carlsnaes (eds.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications and Elizabeth R. DeSombre (2000), Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry Environmentalists, and U.S. Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • - John Bolton (2000) “Is there really ‘law’ in international affairs?”, 10 Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, p. 48).
  • - Friedrich Kratochwil (1984) “Thrasymmachos Revisited: On the Relevance of Norms and the Study of Law in International Relations”, 37 Journal of International Affairs
  • - Robert O. Keohane (1982), “The Demand for International Regimes”, 36 International Organization, 2; and Robert O. Keohane (1997), “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics”, 38 Havard International Law Journal.
  • - Wallerstein, I. 1974. “The Rise and Future Demise of the World-Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis”, 16 Comparative Studies in Society and History). See also J. Kentor and P. E. Grimes (2006) “Foreign Investment Dependence and the Environment: A Global Perspective”, in A. Jorgenson and E. Kick (eds.), Globalization and the Environment, Leiden: Brill; A. Jorgenson, (2003) “Consumption and Environmental Degradation: A Cross- National Analysis of the Ecological Footprint”, 50 Social Problems 3.
  • - Timmons Roberts; Bradley C Parks; and Alexis A. Vásquez (2004) “Who Ratifes Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties”, 4 Global Environmental Politics 3.
  • - Jana Von Stein (2005) “Do Treaties constrain or Screen?”, 99 American Political Science Review 4, p. 611
  • - Kenneth W Abbott and Duncan Snidal (2000), “Hard and soft law in international governance”, 54 International Organization 3. See also Judith Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter (2000). “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.” 54 International Organization 3.
  • - Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson & Duncan Snidal (2001). “The Rational Design of International Institutions”, 55 International Organization; Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson, & Duncan Snidal (2001) “Rational Design: Looking Back to Move Forward”, 55 International Organization; Kal Raustiala (2005) “Form and Substance in International Agreements”, 99 American Journal of International Law; and Barbara Koremenos (2005) “Contracting Around International Uncertainty”, 99 American Political Science Review 4.
  • - Barbara Koremenos (2005) “Contracting Around International Uncertainty”, 99 American Political Science Review 4, p. 549.
  • - Carmen G. Gonzalez (2012) “Environmental Justice and International Environmental Law” in Shawkat Alam, Jahid Hossain Bhuiyan, Tareq M.R. Chowdhury, and Erika Techera (eds.),Routledge Handbook of International Environmental Law, NY:Routledge
  • - Ruchi Anand (2004) International Environmental Justice, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited
  • - http://www.iea.org/co2highlights/co2highlights.pdf
  • - Bradley C. Parks and J. Timmons Roberts (2003) “Globalization, Vulnerability to Climate Change and Perceived Injustice in the South”. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, August 16–19, 2003, Atlanta.
  • - Shawkat Alam (2011) ”Economic Globalization: Rethinking its promises for economic and social development from a developing country perspective” in Shawkat Alam, Natalie Klein, and Juliette Overland (eds.), Globalisation and the Quest for Social and Environmental Justice, NY: Routledge
  • - Oona A. Hathaway (2007) “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?”, 51 Journal of Conflict Resolution 4, p. 590.
  • - Scott Barrett (2006) Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making, USA: Oxford University Press, p. 371
  • - Jay Goodliffe & Darren G. Hawkins (2006) “Explaining Commitment: States and the Convention against Torture”, 68 The Journal of Politics 2
  • - Detlef F. Sprinz and Vaahtoranta Tapani (1994) “The Interest-based Explanation of International Environmental Policy”, 48 International Organization 1, p. 9.
  • - J. Timmons Roberts; Bradley C Parks; and Alexis A. Vásquez (2004), “Who Ratifes Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties”, 4 Global Environmental Politics 3, p. 36.
  • - Roberts, J. Timmons, and Nikki D. Thanos (2003) Trouble in Paradise: Globalization and Environmental Crises in Latin America. New York: Routledge.
  • - Eric Neumayer (2002). Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? Journal of Peace Research 39 (2):140. See also Hugh Ward (2006) “International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network”, 43 Journal of Peace Research 2, p. 158
  • - Lisa Martin (2000). Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • - James Fearon (1994) “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes”, American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–592).
  • - Michael J Tierney (2003). Commitments, Credibility and International Cooperation: The Integration of Soviet Successor States into Western Multilateral Regimes. PhD Dissertation. University of California, San Diego. p. 50.
  • - Russell Dalton (1994) The Green Rainbow: Environmental Interest Groups in Western Europe, New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press, p. 1.
  • - J. Timmons Roberts; Bradley C Parks; and Alexis A. Vásquez (2004), “Who Ratifes Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties”, 4 Global Environmental Politics 3, p. 36.
  • - Lotbar Giindling (1996) “Compliance Assistance in International Environmental Law: Capacity-Building Through Financial and Technology Transfer”, Max-Planck- Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, p. 801, available at www. zaoerv.de/56_1996/56_1996_3_a_796_809.pdf
  • - Robert O. Keohane (1984) After Hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, p. 108
  • - Beth A. Simmons (2000). “International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs.” 94 American Political Science Review 4: 819–36.
  • - Kenneth Gould,, Adam Weinberg, and Allan Schnaiberg. (1995) “Natural Resource Use in a Transnational Treadmill”, 21 Humboldt Journal of Social Relations
  • - John W. Meyer, David John Frank, Ann Hironaka, Evan Schofer, and Nancy Brandon Tuma (1997) “The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime 1870–1990”, 51 (4) International Organization, p. 627.
  • - Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, 2011: (TURKSTAT, Prime Ministry (2011), Turkey Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2009 – Annual Report for Submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change,http://unfccc.int/national_reports/ annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/5888.php Access Date: April 2011).
  • - http://iklim.cob.gov.tr/iklim/Files/IDEP/%C4%B0DEPENG.pdf
  • - http://www.invest.gov.tr/en-US/infocenter/publications/Documents/ENERGY. INDUSTRY.PDF.
  • - Minutes of the 23rd General Assembly Period, 3rd legislative year, 5th session, October 14, 2008.
  • - http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=turkey-can8217t-be-signatoryto- kyoto-protocol-before-eu-membership-says-pepe-2006-11-02
  • - Mustafa Kemal Cengiz, on behalf of the ’Nationalist Movement Party’ (MHP), Minutes of the 23rd General Assembly Period, 3rd legislative year, 53rd session, February 4, 2009.
  • - http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=yalcin-dogan-turkey-willsign- kyoto-in-2015-2005-02-18
  • - http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=pepe-turkey-needs-50-billionto- meet-environmental-criteria-2005-03-11
  • - March 3, 2007 (http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=turkey-plansmeasures- to-cut-emissions-2007-03-03)
  • - Referans Gazetesi, Tuesday, April 17, 2007.
  • - Zaman Gazetesi, Sunday, 22 June 2008.
  • - http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=domestic-newsline-2005-01-26
  • - http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=yalcin-dogan-turkey-willsign- kyoto-in-2015-2005-02-18
  • - http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h.php?news=turkey-can8217t-be-signatoryto- kyoto-protocol-before-eu-membership-says-pepe-2006-11-02
  • - Minutes of the 23rd General Assembly Period, 3rd legislative year, 54th session, February 5, 2008.
  • - Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Turkish Daily News
  • - The Green Paper on Adapting to Climate Change in Europe (COM, 2007, 354). In 2009, this target has been re-confirmed by the White paper -Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action (COM/2009/0147).
  • - EU calls on Ankara to ratify Kyoto Protocol [06.07.2007 http://en.trend.az/ news/world/wnews/952783.html. The environment chapter of negotiations was opened on 21 December 2010.
  • - Saturday, March 3, 2007 (http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/h. php?news=turkey-plans-measures-to-cut-emissions-2007-03-03)
  • - Faruk Sönmezoğlu (2006) İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan Günümüze Türk Dış Politikası, Istanbul: Der Yayınları.
  • - Zaman 22 June 2008.
  • - Erdogan’s speech delivered on 24 September 2007 in New York, as part of an ongoing General Assembly meeting of the United Nations.
  • - http://www.todayszaman.com/news-145448-environment-minister-ignoringkyoto- comes-at-a-price.html
  • - Tusiad Press release 6 February 2009.
  • - Official Gazette no/dated:27655/28 July 2010
  • - The study, titled Environment and Civil Society in Turkey: Organization and Latest Tendencies, was conducted by Bahçeşehir University Hande Paker and Gençer Baykan and was released on April, 2008.
  • - Since 2008, the General Directorate of Environmental Management under the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization acts as the Focal Point.
  • - http://www.germanwatch.org/klima/cri11.pdf
  • - European Commission’s “Turkey 2010 Progress Report”, available at http:// ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf, p.91.
  • - European Commission’s “Turkey 2010 Progress Report”, available at http:// ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/tr_rapport_2010_en.pdf, p.91.