ROL TEORİSİ, AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ VE TÜRKİYE’NİN BÖLGESEL DIŞ POLİTİKASI

Bu makale, Avrupalılaşma çalışmalarına rol teorisi bakış açısı getirmekte ve AB’nin hedef ülkelerin dış politika davranışını açıklamada daha bütüncül bir yaklaşım sunmaktadır. Holsti’nin (1970) rol teorisi yaklaşımından esinlenerek Türkiye’nin AB’ye karşı tutumundaki değişimler inceleyen bu makale AB’nin kendisine sunduğu reçeteler olan ikili ilişkilerde barışçıl bir dış politika izlemesi ve bölgesel barış ve istikrara katkıda bulunması gibi beklentilere ne ölçüde karşılık verdiğini analiz etmektedir. Makalenin bulguları farklı ulusal rol algılamalarından dolayı bürokratların siyasi elitler üzerinde veto oyuncusu durumuna geldiğini ve bu nedenle Türkiye’nin uluslararası sistem içinde oynadığı rollerin ‘aktif-bağımsız’, ‘köprü’ ve ‘‘arabulucu-bütünleştirici’ arasında gidip geldiğini ortaya koymaktadır.

ROLE THEORY, THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY’S REGIONAL FOREIGN POLICY

This paper brings a role theory perceptive to Europeanisation studies and offers a more holistic analysis to look at the impact of the EU on the national foreign policies of target states. Using the insights from Holsti’s (1970) role theory, the paper analyses the uneasy swing of Turkish foreign policy vis-à-vis the EU through an assessment of Turkey’s adherence to the EU’s role prescriptions: following a peaceful foreign policy and contributing to regional peace and stability. Findings of the paper highlight that Turkey faced severalrole strains arising from different role conceptions of bureaucratic and political elites leading the former to act as a veto player on the latter. As a result, the roles performed by Turkey in the international system ranged from ‘active-independent’, ‘bridge’ and ‘mediator-integrator’.

___

  • Akpınar, P. (2015), “Mediation as a Foreign Policy Tool in the Arab Spring: Turkey, Qatar and Iran”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 17 (3), 252-268.
  • Allison, G. and Zelikow, P. (1999) Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, New York, Longman.
  • Alptemoçin, A. K. Foreign Minister of Turkey (Press Conference), 29 December 1990, available upon request.
  • Alexander, N. C and Wiley, M. G. (1981) Situated Activity and Identity Formation, Rosenberg, M., Turner, R. (edts), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, New York, Basic Books.
  • Aras, B. (2012) Turkey’s Mediation and Friends of Mediation Initiative, SAM Papers, No. 4 (December) http://www.sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/SAMPapersDec12. pdf (accessed 01 November 2018).
  • Ataman, M. (2003). “Özalist Dış Politika: Aktif ve Rasyonel Bir Anlayış”, Bilgi 7 (2), 49-64.
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2016). “De-Europeanisation through Discourse: A Critical discourse Analysis of AKP’s Election Speeches”, South European Society and Politics, 21 (1), 45-58.
  • Bakır, B. (2007), Necmettin Erbakan, Demir. A. F. (edt), Türk Dış Politikasında Liderler, (343-439), İstanbul, Bağlam Yayıncılık
  • Bila, F (1999), İki buçuk savaş (Two and half Wars) Milliyet, http://www.milliyet.com.tr/1999/06/07/yazar/bila.html (accessed 01 November 2018).
  • Billion, D., (1997). La Politique Exteriuere de la Turquie-Une longue queta dîdentite, L’Harmettan, Paris.
  • Bengtsson, R., and Elgström, O. (2012). “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8 (1), 93-108.
  • Bozkır, V. (2014). Minister for EU Affairs, Debating the Ministry for EU Affairs’ Budget for 2015, Ankara: Minutes of the Planning and Budgetary Commission, Turkish Grand National Assembly (24 November).
  • Brummer, K. and Thies, C. G. (2015). “The Contested Selection of National Role Conceptions”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 11 (3), 273-293.
  • Cantir, C. and Kaarbo, J. (2012) “Contested Roles and Domestic Politics: Reflections on Role Theory in Foreign Policy Analysis and IR Theory”, Foreign Policy Analysis 8, 5-24.
  • Cebeci, Münevver (2016) “De-Europeaniation or Counter-Conduct? Turkey’s Democratisation and the EU”, South European Society and Politics, 21 (1), 119-132.
  • Cem, Ismail. (1999) Debating the Ministry for Foreign Affairs Budget for 1999, Ankara: Minutes of the Planning and Budgetary Commission, Turkish Grand National Assembly (June 15).
  • Cem, I. (2002). Turkey in the New Century. Ankara, Rüstem Yayınevi. Cohen, B. C., and Harris. S. C., (1975). Foreign Policy”, Greenstein, F. I., Polsby, N. W. (edt.) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 6, (381-437). Reading, Addison- Wesley.
  • Commission of the European Communities, Commission Opinion on Turkey’s Request for Accession to the Community, S E C < 8 9 ) 2 2 9 0 f i n a V2, Brussels, 20 December 1989, available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/4475/1/4475.pdf (accessed 20 November 2018).
  • Commission of the European Union. (2003). Regular Report on Turkey. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission of the European Union (2008). Regular Progress Report on Turkey. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Çavuşoğlu, M. (2018). Debating the Ministry for Foreign Affairs Budget for 2019, Ankara: Minutes of the Planning and Budgetary Commission, Turkey Grand National Assembly (14 November).
  • Davutoğlu, A. (2013), “Turkey’s Mediation: Critical Reflections From the Field”, Middle East Policy, Vol. XX, No. 1, Spring.
  • Demirel, S. (1991), Türkiye ve Yeni Dünya Düzeni, TBMM Kütüphanesi, Yer 92-3, KOP: 3, DEM: 91-8269 (11 December).
  • Duchêne, F. (1973). The European Community and the Uncertainties of Independence, Kohnstamm, M., Hager, W., A Nation Writ Large? Foreign Policy Problems before the European Community (pp. 1-21), Basingstoke, Macmillan.
  • Dyson, K. (2007) Enlarging the Euro Area: External Empowerment and Domestic Transformation in East Central Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • From, J. (2002), “Decision-making in a Complex Environment: A Sociological Institutionalist Analysis of Competition Policy”, Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (2), 219-237.
  • Göle, N. (1996). Authoritarian Secularism and Islamist Politics: The Case of Turkey, Richard, A. (edt), Civil Society in the Middle East, Vol 2, (21-26), Leiden, E. J. Brill.
  • Goldmann, K, (1988). Change and Stability in the International System. The Problems and Possibilities of Détente. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf
  • Grabbe, H. (2003). Europeanisation Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in EU Accession Process. Featherstone, K. Politics of Europeanisation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Halperin, M. H and Clapp, P. A. with Kanter, A. (2006). Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy, 2nd Eds., Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Hermann, C. F. (1990), “When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy”, International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 3-21.
  • Holsti, K. J. (1970) “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy”, International Studies Quarterly 14 (3), 233-309.
  • Holsti, K J (ed.) (1982). Why Nations Realign. Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Postwar World. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Katzenstein, P. (1996), Cultural Norms and National Security. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Kraidy, M. and Al-Ghazzi, O. (2013). “Neo-Ottoman Cool: Turkish Popular Culture in the Arab Public Sphere”, Popular Communication, 11 (1), 17–29.
  • Laver, M. and Shepsle, K. A. (1996). Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meyer-Sahling, J.H., Lowe, W. and Stolk, C. (2016). “Silent Professionalisation: EU Integration and the Professional Socialisation of Public Officials in Central and Eastern Europe”, European Union Politics, 17(1), 162 - 183.
  • Oğuzlu, T. (2016) “Turkish foreign policy at the nexus of changing international and regional dynamics”, Turkish Studies, 17 (1), 58-67.
  • Ovalı, Ş. and Bozdağlıoğlu, Y. (2012) “Role Theory and Securitization: An Agency Based Framework for Decoding Turkey’s Diplomatic Offensive against Israel”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations Vol. 43.
  • Parlar-Dal, E. and Erşen, E. (2014), “Reassessing the Turkish Model in the Post Cold War Era A Role Theory Perspective”, Turkish Studies, 15 (2), 258-282.
  • Rosenau, J. N. (1987) Roles and Role Scenarios in Foreign Policy, Walker, S. G. (edt), Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, (45-65), Durham, NC, Duke University.
  • Sarbin, T. R. and Allen, V. L. (1968). Role Theory, Lindzey, G., Aronson (edt), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. Reading, MA, Addison-Westely.
  • Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.
  • Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S., and Knobel, S. (2003), “Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3), 495-518.
  • Skidmore, D. (1994). Explaining State Responses to International Change: the Structural Sources of Foreign Policy Rigidity and Change, Hagan, J.D., Rosati, J.A. and Sampson (edts), M.W.III, Foreign Policy Restructuring: How Governments Respond to Global Change, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
  • Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, R. (2018) Conditionality, the EU and Turkey: From Transformation to Retrenchment, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Thies, C., G. (2016). Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis in Latin America, Foreign Policy Analysis, 13 (3), 662-681.
  • Thies, C., G (2012), “International Socialization Processes vs. Israeli National Role Conceptions: Can Role Theory Integrate IR Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis?”, Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1), 25-46.
  • Üste, B. (2006). Türkiye’de Siyasal İktidara Gelen Partilerin AET/AT/AB İlişkileri Hakkındaki Görüşleri ve Yönetim Yapısına Etkileri, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8 (3), 332-349.
  • Volgy, T. J., & Schwarz, J. E. (1991), “Does Politics Stop at the Water Edge? Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Cases of Great Britain, France and West Germany”, Journal of Politics, 53, 615-643.
  • Yılmaz, M. (1988). Foreign Minister. Debating the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' Budget for 1990. Ankara: Minutes of General Assembly, TGNA (April18).
  • Yaraç-Laçinok, N. (2007). Turgut Özal, Demir, A. F. (edt), Türk Dış Politikasında Liderler, İstanbul, Bağlam Yayıncılık.