Marka Özgünlüğünün Marka Güveni Üzerindeki Etkisi: Cep Telefonu MarkalarıÜzerine Bir Araştırma

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı, tüketicilerin kullandıkları cep telefonu markalarını dikkate alarak markaözgünlüğünün marka güveni üzerindeki olası etkilerini belirlemeye yöneliktir.Yöntem – Çalışma Mayıs-Haziran 2021 de tüketicilere çevrimiçi anketle veri toplama yöntemikullanılmış olup 500 anket elde edilmiş ancak hatalı ve eksik 30 anket tasnif dışı bırakılarak toplamda470 anket üzerinden sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmada kolayda örnekleme yöntemikullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın analizinde kısmi en küçük kareler yöntemi ile yapısal model test edilmiştir.Bulgular – Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, marka özgünlüğünün marka güveni üzerinde doğrudan vepozitif bir etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca çalışmada marka özgünlüğü boyutlarının da ayrıayrı marka güveni üzerindeki olası etkileri de test edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre markaözgünlüğü boyutları (süreklilik, orijinallik, doğallık ve güvenilirlik) marka güveni üzerinde doğrudanve pozitif etkilerinin olduğu görülmüş ve oluşturulan araştırma hipotezleri kabul edilmiştir. Tartışma – Tüketicilere yönelik olarak kullandıkları cep telefonu markası bağlamında markaözgünlüğü ve marka güveni incelenmiş olup sonuçlar tartışılmıştır.

Effect of Brand Authenticity on Brand Trust: A Research on Mobile Phones

Purpose – This study aims to determine the probable effects of brand authenticity on brand trustconsidering the brands of mobile phones used by the consumers. Design/methodology/approach – In the study, the method of data collection through online surveyconducted on May-June 2021 for consumers has been used and 500 surveys have been submitted,however, 30 surveys with mistakes or missing parts have been taken out of the classification and theresults have been assessed on 470 surveys in total. Convenience sampling method has been used in thestudy. Structural model has been tested by partial least squares method in the analysis of the study. Findings – It has been detected in line with the results obtained that brand authenticity has a directand positive effect on brand trust. In addition, probable effects of brand authenticity dimensions onbrand trust have been tested individually. In line with the results, it has been observed that brandauthenticity dimensions (continuity, originality, naturalness and reliability) have direct and positiveeffects on brand trust and the research hypotheses have been accepted. Discussions – Brand authenticity and brand trust have been studied in the context of mobile phonebrands used by the consumers and the results have been discussed.

___

  • Akbar, M. M., and Wymer, W. (2016). Refining the conceptualization of Brand Authenticity. Journal of Brand Management, 24(1), 14–32.
  • Alexander, N. (2009). Brand authentication: Creating and maintaining brand auras. European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 551–562.
  • Arıkan, E. ve Telci, E. E. (2014). Marka Özgünlüğü, Marka Güveni ve Müşteri Satın Alma Davranışı. Gaziantep Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi 19. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 523-532.
  • Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., and Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 193–208.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1991). Multitrait–multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 426–439.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., and Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458.
  • Bagozzi, R., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
  • Beverland, M. (2005a). Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003–1029.
  • Beverland, M. (2005b). Brand management and the challenge of authenticity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(7), 460–461.
  • Beverland, M., and Farrelly, F. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838–856.
  • Brown, S. (2010). Where the wild brands are: Some thoughts on anthropomorphic marketing. The Marketing Review, 10(3), 209–224.
  • Bruhn, M., Schoenmüller, V., Schafer, D., and Heinrich, D. (2012). Brand authenticity: Towards a deeper understanding of its conceptualization and measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 567–576.
  • Burnett, J., and Hutton, R. B. (2007). New consumers need new brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(5), 342–347.
  • Chaudhuri, A., and Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93.
  • Chin, W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. [içinde], (ss.655-690),[Ed.V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang], Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York.
  • Delgado-Ballester, E. (2004). Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories: A multigroup invariance analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 38(5/6), 573–592.
  • Delgado-Ballester, E., and Luis Munuera- Alemán, J. (2001). Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1238–1258.
  • Doney, P. M., and Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.
  • Dowell, D., Heffernan, T., and Morrison, M. (2013). Trust formation at the growth stage of a business tobusiness relationship: A qualitative investigation. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 436–451.
  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., and Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.
  • Eggers, F., O’Dwyer, M., Kraus, S., Vallaster, C., and Güldenberg, S. (2013). The impact of brand authenticity on brand trust and SME growth: A CEO perspective. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 340–348.
  • Fornell C., and Lacker, F., D., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–353.
  • Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., and Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198.
  • Gilmore, J. H., and Pine, J. (2007). Authenticity: What consumers really want. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Greenberg, M. R. (2014). Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust. Energy Research & Social Science, 1(2014), 152–160.
  • Guevremont, A., and Grohmann, B. (2017). Does brand authenticity alleviate the effect of brand scandals? Journal of Brand Management, 25 (4), 322-336.
  • Hair J., E., Ringle C., M., and Sarstedt M., (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.
  • Hair J.,F., Hult G.,T., Ringle C.,M., and Sarstedt M., (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, California.
  • Hair J.,F., Sarstedt M., Pieper, T., M., and ., Ringle C.,M, (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling İn Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recemmendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning, 45, 320-340.
  • Henseler J., Ringle C.,M and Sinkovics, R.,R., (2009). The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modelling in International Marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319.
  • Hess, J., and Story, J. (2005). Trust-based commitment: Multidimensional consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(6), 313–322.
  • Hiscock, J. (2001). Most trusted brands. Marketing, 1(March), 32–33.
  • Hobbs, J. E., and Goddard, E. (2015). Consumers and trust. Food Policy, 52, 71–74.
  • Hon, L. C., and Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gaines, FL:Institute for public relations
  • Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (Third Edition), New York: Guilford Press.
  • Lantieri, T., and Chiagouris, L. (2009). Brand trust in an age without trust: Expert opinions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 78–86.
  • Malone, C., and Fiske, S. T. (2013). The human brand: How we relate to people, products, and companies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Marketing, 27(7), 639–661.
  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.
  • Molleda, J.-C. (2010). Authenticity and the construct’s dimensions in public relations and communication research. Journal of Communication Management, 14(3), 223–236.
  • Molleda, J.-C., and Jain, R. (2013). Testing a perceived authenticity index with triangulation research: The case of Xcaret in Mexico. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(1), 1–20.
  • Morgan, R. M., and Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
  • Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., and Grohmann, B. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200–218.
  • Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D. and Folse, J. A. G. (2016). Brand Authenticity: Testing the Antecedents and Outcomes of Brand Management’s Passion for its Products, Psychology and Marketing, 33/6, 421-436.
  • Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., and Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090–1098.
  • Napoli, J., Dickinson-Delaporte, S. J., Beverland, M. B., and Farrelly, F. (2016). The brand authenticity continuum: Strategic approaches for building value. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(13-14), 1201– 1229.
  • Pace, S. (2015). Can a commercially oriented brand be authentic? A preliminary study of the effects of a probusiness attitude on consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(3), 1167– 1178.
  • Podsakoff, P. M. and Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4), 531-544.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879-903.
  • Portal, S., Abratt, R., and Bendixen, M., (2019). The Role of Brand Authenticity in Developing Brand Trust. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27 (8), 714-729.
  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.
  • Şahin, A., Zehir, C., and Kitapçı, H. (2011). The effects of brand experiences, trust and satisfaction on building brand loyalty; an empirical research on global brands. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24(2011), 1288–1301.
  • Schallehn, M., Burmann, C., and Riley, N. (2014). Brand authenticity: Model development and empirical testing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(3), 192–199.
  • Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. (Seventh Edition). West Sussex, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Shen, H., and Kim, J.-N. (2012). The authentic enterprise: Another buzz word, or a true driver of quality relationships? Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(4), 371–389.
  • Singh, J. J., Iglesias, O., and Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2012). Does having an ethical brand matter? The influence of consumer perceived ethicality on trust, affect and loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 541– 549.
  • Sung, Y., and Kim, J. (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology & Marketing, 27(7), 639–661.
  • Vann, E. F. (2006). The Limits of Authenticity in Vietnamese Consumer Markets. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 286–296.
  • Vargo, S. L.,and Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.
  • Yıldız, S., ve Kırmızıbiber, A., (2020). Marka Özgünlüğü: Cep Telefonu Kullanıcıları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 40, (Temmuz), 37-52.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

VIX (Korku Endeksi) ile BİST Endeksleri Arasındaki Volatilite Etkileşiminin DCC GARCH Modeliyle Analizi

Hüseyin Başar ÖNEM

Turizm Sektörü Çalışanlarında Atalet Yordayıcısı Olarak İş Yaşamında Yalnızlık

Aydın İNAK, Gamze ÖZEL

Tedarikçi Bağlılığını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme YöntemleriyleBelirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Giresun İli Örneği

Selçuk KORUCUK, Salih MEMİŞ

Çalışan Koçluk İlişkisinin Algılanan Kalitesinin Türkçe Ölçek Uyarlaması vePsikolojik Sermayeye Etkisinin Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile İncelenmesi

Nuray TOSUNOĞLU, Tuba BEKİŞ, Güler SAĞLAM ARI

İş Yaşam Dengesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Lisansüstü Tezlerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Mecbure ASLAN

İş Güvencesi Memnuniyeti ve Çeşitli Değişkenlerin İşten Ayrılma Niyetine EtkilerininLojistik Regresyon Analizi İle İncelenmesi

Serap ALKAYA, Vesile Rüya EHTİYAR

Kamu ve Özel Sektörde İş Motivasyonu Uygulaması: Çok Boyutlu Bir Analiz

Batuhan AYAN, Aykut GÖKSEL

BİST’te İşlem Gören Tekstil, Giyim Eşyası ve Deri Sektörü İşletmelerinin Altman-ZSkor Yöntemi İle Finansal Başarısızlık Tahmini

Meral EROL FİDAN

Petrol ve Doğalgaz Fiyatları İle Hisse Senedi Fiyatları İlişkisi: BİST Sinai SektöründeAmpirik Bir Araştırma

Rıfat KARAKUŞ

Kültürel Öğeler İçeren Reklamların Beğenisi Demografik Özelliklere GöreFarklılaşır Mı?

Metehan TOLON, Aslıhan TÜFEKÇİ, Gökhan Alper FİGEN