Borsada İşlem Sırası Kapanmaları için Tahmin Modeli: Borsa İstanbul Örneği

Amaç – Araştırmanın amacı, Borsa İstanbul Pay Piyasası’ndaki zorunlu işleme kapanmaların tahmininde kullanılacak bir model geliştirilmesi ve tahmin gücünün test edilmesidir. Yöntem – Araştırmanın kapsamını, 2000-2018 döneminde Borsa İstanbul’da işlem sırası kapatılan 79 şirket oluşturmaktadır. Kontrol grubu ile beraber, araştırmanın örneklemine 147 şirket dahil edilmiştir. Model geliştirilmesinde başarısızlık literatüründen yararlanılmıştır. Modele seçilecek değişkenler; “likidite”, “karlılık”, “mali yapı ve yükümlülükleri karşılama”, “çalışma etkinliği”, “piyasa çarpanları” ve “büyüklük” olmak üzere altı boyutta toplanmıştır. Çalışmada, araştırma örneklemindeki veri sayısının kısıtlı olması da dikkate alınarak, lojistik regresyon yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Lojistik modelde yer alacak değişkenlerin belirlenmesinde, korelasyon katsayıları ile birlikte değişkenlerin boyutları ve literatürdeki kullanım sayıları da dikkate alınmıştır. 22 finansal oran arasından yapılan seçim işlemi sonunda, 11 finansal oran bağımsız değişken olarak modele eklenmiştir. Bulgular – Model sonuçlarının beklentilerle ve literatürle uyumlu olduğu görülmüştür. En uygun kesme değeri olan 0,5’e göre model, gözlemlerin %83’ünü doğru bir şekilde sınıflandırmıştır. Modelin işleme kapanmaya ilişkin verdiği sinyallerin %79’u gerçekleşmiştir. Diğer taraftan, modelin öngöremediği işleme kapanmalar (kaçan sinyaller) %13’te sınırlı kalmıştır. Tartışma – Başarısızlık literatüründe lojistik regresyon yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışmalardaki modellere ait “doğru sınıflandırma yüzdeleri” (%77 ile %95 arasında) dikkate alındığında, elde edilen modelin başarı düzeyi (%83) kabul edilebilir düzeydedir. Elde edilen bulgular, işleme kapanmaların tahmininde erken uyarı modellerinden yararlanılabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Prediction Model for Delistings: Empirical Evidence from Borsa İstanbul

Purpose – The aim of the research is to develop a model to predict involuntary delisting from Borsa Istanbul and to test its predictive power. Design/methodology/approach – The scope of the research consists of 79 delisted firms in Borsa Istanbul in the period of 2000-2018. Sample of the research, covering control group, is 147 firms. The model is based on the literature of failure. The variables selected for the model are classified in six dimensions: “liquidity”, “profitability”, “leverage and solvency”, “efficiency”, “market multiples” and “size”. In the research, considering the limited size of data in the research sample, the logistic regression method is applied. While determining the variables to be included in the logistic model, in addition to correlation coefficients, the dimensions of the variables and the number of uses in the literature are also taken into account. At the end of the selection process among 22 financial ratios, 11 financial ratios are used in the model as independent variables. Findings – Model results are found to be compatible with expectations and literature. According to the most appropriate cut-off value of 0.5, the model correctly classifies 83% of the observations. 79% of the signals given by the model regarding delisting is realized. On the other hand, delisting that the model could not predict (missing signals) is limited at 13%. Discussion – When the accurate classification of the models in the studies using the method of logistic regression in the literature of failure (between 77% and 95%) is taken into consideration, the success level of the applied model (83%) is acceptable. The findings reveal that early warning models can be used for predicting delisting.

___

  • Aksoy, A. ve Tanrıöven, C. (2014). Sermaye Piyasası Yatırım Araçları ve Analizi (Beşinci Baskı), Ankara, Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Aksoy, A. ve Yalçıner, K. (2013). İşletme Sermayesi Yönetimi (Beşinci Baskı), Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy, The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
  • Altman, E. I. (1984). A further empirical investigation of the bankruptcy cost question, The Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1067-1089.
  • Altman, E. I., Haldeman, R. G. and Narayanan, P. (1977). ZETATM analysis A new model to identify bankruptcy risk of corporations, Journal of Banking & Finance, 1(1), 29-54.
  • Altman, E. I., Iwanicz‐Drozdowska, M., Laitinen, E. K. and Suvas, A. (2017). Financial distress prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman's Z‐score model, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28(2), 131-171.
  • Altman, E. I., Sabato, G. and Wilson, N. (2010). The value of non-financial information in SME risk management, The Journal of Credit Risk, 6(2), 1-33.
  • Arslan, Ö. and Karan, M. B. (2009). Credit risks and internationalization of SMEs, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(4), 361-368.
  • Aziz, A. and Lawson, G. H. (1989). Cash flow reporting and financial distress models: Testing of hypotheses, Financial Management, 18(1), 55-63.
  • Back, B., Laitinen, T., Sere, K. and van Wezel, M. (1996). Choosing bankruptcy predictors using discriminant analysis, logit analysis, and genetic algorithms, Turku Centre for Computer Science Technical Report, 40(2), 1-18.
  • Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure, Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71-111.
  • Begley, J., Ming, J. and Watts, S. (1996). Bankruptcy classification errors in the 1980s: An empirical analysis of Altman's and Ohlson's models, Review of Accounting Studies, 1(4), 267-284.
  • Bharath, S. T. and Dittmar, A. K. (2010). Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets?, Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1771-1818.
  • Bhimani, A., Gulamhussen, M. A. and Lopes, S. D. R. (2010). Accounting and non-accounting determinants of default: an analysis of privately-held firms, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(6), 517-532.
  • Casey, C. and Bartczak, N. (1985). Using operating cash flow data to predict financial distress: Some extensions, Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 384-401.
  • Charitou, A., Neophytou, E. and Charalambous, C. (2004). Predicting corporate failure: empirical evidence for the UK, European Accounting Review, 13(3), 465-497.
  • Chen, W. S. and Du, Y. K. (2009). Using neural networks and data mining techniques for the financial distress prediction model, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4075-4086.
  • Ciampi, F. (2018). Using prior payment behavior variables for small enterprise default prediction modelling, International Journal of Business and Management, 13(4), 57-72.
  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Klapper, L. (2003). Resolution of corporate distress in East Asia, Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(1-2), 199-216.
  • Clark, T. A. and Weinstein, M. I. (1983). The behavior of the common stock of bankrupt firms, The Journal of Finance, 38(2), 489-504.
  • Cultrera, L. and Brédart, X. (2016). Bankruptcy prediction: the case of Belgian SMEs, Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(1), 101-119.
  • Çağlayan, E. ve Güriş, S. (2005). Ekonometri Temel Kavramlar, Beşinci Baskı, İstanbul, Der Yayınları.
  • Çelik, Ş. (2013). Micro credit risk metrics: a comprehensive review, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 20(4), 233-272.
  • Çevik, Y.E. (2013). Mali Başarısızlık Nedeniyle Borsa İstanbul’da İşlem Sırası Kapanan Şirketlerin Tespiti ve Hisse Senedi Performanslarının İncelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi) YÖKSİS Veri Tabanı.
  • Çevik, Y.E. ve Aksoy, A. (2017). Mali Başarısızlık Nedeniyle Borsa İstanbul’da İşlem Sırası Kapanan Şirketlerin Hisse Senedi Performanslarının İncelenmesi, 21. Finans Sempozyumu, Balıkesir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 18-21 Ekim 2017, 497-514.
  • Dahiya, S. and Klapper, L. (2007). Who survives? A cross-country comparison, Journal of Financial Stability, 3(3), 261-278.
  • Dambolena, I. G. and Shulman, J. M. (1988). A primary rule for detecting bankruptcy: watch the cash, Financial Analysts Journal, 44(5), 74-78.
  • Dayı, F. (2020). Sistematik Riskin Hisse Senedi Getirisine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği. Optimum: Journal of Economics & Management Sciences/Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 1-19.
  • Dimitras, A. I., Slowinski, R., Susmaga, R. and Zopounidis, C. (1999). Business failure prediction using rough sets, European Journal of Operational Research, 114(2), 263-280.
  • Du Jardin, P. and Séverin, E. (2011). Predicting corporate bankruptcy using a self-organizing map: An empirical study to improve the forecasting horizon of a financial failure model, Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 701-711.
  • Duarte, F. D., Gama, A. P. M. and Gulamhussen, M. A. (2018). Defaults in bank loans to SMEs during the financial crisis, Small Business Economics, 51(3), 591-608.
  • Emirmahmutoğlu, F. (2011). Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde para krizlerinin ekonometrik analizi. (Doktora tezi). YÖKSİS Veri Tabanı.
  • Ercan, K. M., Öcal, N. and Kadıoğlu, E. (2015). Predicting financial failure using decision tree algorithms: an empirical test on the manufacturing industry at Borsa Istanbul, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(7), 189-206.
  • Fitzpatrick, P. J. (1932). A comparison of the ratios of successful industrial enterprises with those of failed companies, The Certified Public Accountant, 2, 598-605.
  • Gilbert, L. R., Menon, K. and Schwartz, K. B. (1990). Predicting bankruptcy for firms in financial distress, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(1), 161-171.
  • Goldberger, A. S. (1964). Econometric theory, New York, John Wiley&Sons.
  • Harris, J.H., Panchapagesan, V. and Werner, I.M. (2008). Off but not gone: a study of Nasdaq delistings, Working Paper Series 2008-6, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
  • Hu, Y. C. and Ansell, J. (2007). Measuring retail company performance using credit scoring techniques, European Journal of Operational Research, 183(3), 1595-1606.
  • İnternet: Borsa İstanbul (2019) İşlem Sırası Kapanan Şirketler. URL: https://www.borsaistanbul.com/veriler/verileralt/hisse-senetleri-piyasasi-verileri/sirketler-verileri adresinden 10 Ocak 2020’de alınmıştır.
  • Jones, S. (2017). Corporate bankruptcy prediction: a high dimensional analysis, Review of Accounting Studies, 22(3), 1366-1422.
  • Keasey, K. and McGuinness, P. (1990). The failure of UK industrial firms for the period 1976–1984, logistic analysis and entropy measures, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(1), 119-135.
  • Koh, H. C. and Low, C. K. (2004). Going concern prediction using data mining techniques. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(3), 462-476.
  • Laitinen, E. K. and Laitinen, T. (1998). Cash management behavior and failure prediction, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25(7‐8), 893-919.
  • Lehn, K. and Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions, The Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771-787.
  • Li, H. and Sun, J. (2008). Ranking-order case-based reasoning for financial distress prediction, Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8), 868-878.
  • Lin, L. and Piesse, J. (2001). The identification of corporate distress: a conditional probability analysis approach, Birkbeck, University of London, School of Management and Organizational Psychology.
  • Lin, T. H. (2009). A cross model study of corporate financial distress prediction in Taiwan: Multiple discriminant analysis, logit, probit and neural networks models, Neurocomputing, 72(16-18), 3507-3516.
  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
  • Macey, J., O’Hara, M. and Pompilio, D. (2008). Down and out in the stock market: the law and economics of the delisting process, The Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 683-713.
  • Martinez, I. and Serve, S. (2011). The delisting decision: The case of buyout offer with squeeze-out (BOSO), International Review of Law and Economics, 31(4), 228-239.
  • Mensah, Y. M. (1984). An examination of the stationarity of multivariate bankruptcy prediction models: A methodological study, Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 380-395.
  • Michelsen, M. and Klein, C. (2011). “Privacy please!” The public to private decision in Germany, Review of Managerial Science, 5(1), 49-85.
  • Min, J. H. and Jeong, C. (2009). A binary classification method for bankruptcy prediction, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5256-5263.
  • Morris, R. (2018). Early Warning Indicators of Corporate Failure: A critical review of previous research and further empirical evidence, New York, Routledge Revivals.
  • Moyer, R. C. (1977). Forecasting financial failure: a re-examination. Financial Management (pre-1986), 6(1), 11- 17.
  • Norton, C. L. and Smith, R. E. (1979). A comparison of general price level and historical cost financial statements in the prediction of bankruptcy, Accounting Review, 54(1), 72-87.
  • Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy, Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
  • Ooghe, H., Camerlynck, J. and Balcaen, S. (2003). The Ooghe-Joos-De Vos failure prediction models: a crossindustry validation, Brussels Economic Review, 46(1), 39-70.
  • Opler, T. C. and Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance, The Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015-1040.
  • Öztürk, M. B. (2004). Finansal performansın ölçülmesinde alternatif bir yöntem "ekonomik katma değer", Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18(3-4), 351-368.
  • Pagano, M., Panetta, F. and Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis, The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27-64.
  • Platt, H. D. and Platt, M. B. (1990). Development of a class of stable predictive variables: the case of bankruptcy prediction, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(1), 31-51.
  • Premachandra, I. M., Bhabra, G. S. and Sueyoshi, T. (2009). DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique, European Journal of Operational Research, 193(2), 412-424.
  • Sanger, G. C. and Peterson, J. D. (1990). An empirical analysis of common stock delistings, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 261-272.
  • Smith, R. F. and Winakor, A. H. (1935). Changes in the financial structure of unsuccessful industrial corporations, Bureau of Business Research, Bulletin No. 51, Urbana, University of Illinois.
  • Sung, T. K., Chang, N. and Lee, G. (1999). Dynamics of modeling in data mining: interpretive approach to bankruptcy prediction, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(1), 63-85.
  • Theodossiou, P. (1991). Alternative models for assessing the financial condition of business in Greece, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 18(5), 697-720.
  • Thomsen, S. and Vinten, F. (2014). Delistings and the costs of governance: a study of European stock exchanges 1996–2004, Journal of Management & Governance, 18(3), 793-833.
  • Tanriöven, C., and Aksoy, E. E. (2009). Krizlerin Reel Sektör İşletmeleri Üzerine Etkileri: İMKB’de Sektörel Bazda İnceleme. Gazi Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 11(2), 79-114.
  • Tinoco, M. H. and Wilson, N. (2013). Financial distress and bankruptcy prediction among listed companies using accounting, market and macroeconomic variables, International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 394-419.
  • Tutino, M., Panetta, I. C. and Laghi, E. (2014). Key Factors in Delisting Process in Italy: Empirical Evidence, GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR), 2(4), 218-223.
  • Zavgren, C. V. (1985). Assessing the vulnerability to failure of American industrial firms: a logistic analysis, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 12(1), 19-45.
  • Zavgren, C. V. and Friedman, G. E. (1988). Are bankruptcy prediction models worthwhile? An application in securities analysis, Management International Review, 28(1), 34-44.
  • Zopounidis, C. and Paraschou, D. (2013). Multicriteria decision aid methods for the prediction of business failure, (Vol. 12), Springer Science & Business Media.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Effect of Organizational Identification on Organizational Commitment

Ertuğrul KÖSE, M. Çağrı PEHLİVANOĞLU

Döviz Kuru, Faiz Oranı ile BİST100 ve BİST Ulaştırma Endeksi Arasındaki İlişkinin Ampirik Analizi

Abdulkadir ALICI

Psikolojik Sözleşme, Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Güven Ve İşyerinde Yalnızlık İlişkisi: Karşılılık Normu Yaklaşımı

Ediz GÜRİPEK, BERRİN GÜZEL

Target Costing as a Strategic Cost Management Tool and a Survey on Its Implementation in the Turkish Furniture Industry

Duygu CELAYİR

Perakendecilikte Self Servis Teknoloji Kullanımını Etkileyen Faktörler ve Sonuçları: Süpermarketlerde Self Servis Kasalar Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Yasin GÜLTEKİN, Selin KÜÇÜKKANCABAŞ ESEN

The Impact of Perceived Destination Restorative Qualities on Chinese Tourists’ Behavioral Intention After Visiting Thailand

Jin LU, Fuangfa AMPONSTIRA

Dönüşümcü Liderliğin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışına Etkisi: İlköğretim ve Ortaöğretim Okullarında Bir Araştırma

Bağdat YAMAN, Mustafa Denizhan YILDIRIM

A Validation of the Multidimensional Perceived Value in the Model of E-loyalty towards Sino-Thai Cross-border E-commerce based on China’s Customers

Li WANG, Manoch PROMPANYO

Halka Açık Şirketlerde Kar Dağıtım Politikalarını Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Şerafettin SEVİM, Havva DAŞCI

Borsada İşlem Sırası Kapanmaları için Tahmin Modeli: Borsa İstanbul Örneği

Yasin Erdem ÇEVİK, Ahmet AKSOY