An Investigation of Employee Performance Differences between Native and Immigrant Employees

An Investigation of Employee Performance Differences between Native and Immigrant Employees

Purpose - Employee performance assessments are carried out using different techniques and tools, including subjective scales. Moreover, with the increase of immigration for work around the world, there is a question about the difference in employee performance between local and immigrant workers. The research aims to investigate the differences in employee performance between native and immigrant employees. Design/methodology/approach – This research presents data from Turkey on employee performance using a subjective scale with three dimensions. A total of 113 questionnaires were analysed from employees of NGO firms in Turkey, while the sample included native Turkish employees and immigrant employees. The analysis techniques included verification of the measurement model through confirmatory factor analysis, as well as a structural model and Pearson’s correlation for relationship testing. An ANOVA test was used for the testing of significant differences between the two ethnic groups. Findings – The CFA showed an acceptable fit of the measurement model for employee performance, while the reliability of the scale showed an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.951. The structural model showed strong correlations between the three dimensions of employee performance: contextual and adaptive (β = 0.864, p < 0.001), task and adaptive (β = 0.878, p < 0.001), and tasks and contextual (β = 0.919, p < 0.001). The Pearson’s correlations confirmed similar results of the structural model. The results of the research indicated that despite the apparent difference in aggregated mean score on the indicator and dimension levels, there were no significant differences in subjective employee performance evaluation at the 0.05 level between local and immigrant employees. Discussion – The ANOVA results confirmed the hypotheses of the research that assumed no significant differences between native and immigrant workers in terms of their performance. While research in the literature assumes that immigrant workers can have negative impacts on micro and macro-economic indicators, the Turkish case study confirms that immigrant workers can achieve work requirements and productivity. There were slight differences with regards to adaptive performance, which were noticed but not statically significant for the native workers. However, these differences are expected to diminish using specific organizational strategies.

___

  • Aguinis, H. (2009). Performance Management (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Ahmad, S., & Shahzad, K. (2011). HRM and employee performance: A case of university teachers of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 5(13), 5249-5253.
  • Arasli, H., Arici, H. E., & Ilgen, H. (2019). Blackbox between job crafting and job embeddedness of immigrant hotel employees: a serial mediation model. Economic Research, 32(1), 3935-3962.
  • Benghoul, M. (2018). The Impact of Refugees on the Turkish Workforce. 4th International Social Science Congress (pp. 301-309). Nevşehir: Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University.
  • Carrasco, R., Jimeno, J. F., & Ortega, A. C. (2008). The effect of immigration on the labor market performance of native-born workers: some evidence for Spain. Journal of Population Economics, 21, 627-648.
  • Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8, 189-202.
  • Chowan, J., Zeytinoglu, I. U., & Cooke, G. B. (2016). Immigrants and job satisfaction: Do high performance work systems play a role? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 37(4), 690-715.
  • Diamantidis, A. D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2019). Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 171-193.
  • Esen, O., & Binatli, A. O. (2017). The Impact of Syrian Refugees on the TurkishEconomy: Regional Labour Market Effects. Social Sciences, 6.
  • Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Neale, M. (2000). The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: Investigating the role of situational constraints. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 517-533.
  • Griffin, R. W., Welsh, A., & Moorhead, G. (1981). Perceived Task Characteristics and Employee Performance: A Literature Review. The Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 655-664.
  • Hatane, S. E. (2015). Employee satisfaction and performance as intervening variables of learning organization on financial performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 619-628.
  • Horverak, J. G., Bye, H. H., Sandal, G. M., & Pallesen, S. (2013). Managers’ Evaluations of Immigrant Job Applicants: The Influence of Acculturation Strategy on Perceived Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) and Hiring Outcome. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 46-60.
  • Konakay, G., Akdemir, A., & Mercanlioglu, A. C. (2021). The Effect of Organizational Innovation and Employee Empowerment on Job Performance: A Case of an Industrial Firm. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 13(1), 980-993.
  • Massoudi, A. H. (2016). Employees performance dimensions in Kurdistan region hotel industry. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 7(10), 13534-13539.
  • McCloy, R. A., Campel, J. P., & Cudeck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model performance determininents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 493-505.
  • Park, S., & Park, S. (2019). Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 18(3), 294-324.
  • Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. (2017). Employee Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and Empirical Validation. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(1), 1-17.
  • Raza, H., Anjum, M., & Zia, S. M. (2014). The Impacts of Employee’s Job Performance Behavior and Organizational Culture on Organizational Productivity in Pharmaceutical Industries in Karachi. Intercisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(12), 385-400.
  • Shaheen, A., Naqvi, S. M., & Khan, M. A. (2013). Employees Training and Organizational Performance: Mediation by Employees Performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(4), 490-503.
  • Shaikh, M. R., Tunio, R. A., & Shah, I. A. (2017). Factors Affecting to Employee’s Performance: A Study of Islamic Banks. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(1), 312-321.
  • Tatar, E. L. (2011). The importance of measuring individual performance to increase organizational performance. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 1(2), 113-118.
  • Tetik, S. (2019). The Effect on Work Motivation of Organizational Socialization in Public Organizations: A Research in Ihsaniye District. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 11(3), 1779-1791.
  • Tinofirei, C. (2011). The Unique Factors Affecting Employee Performance In Non Profit Organisations. University of South Africa.
  • Tuffaha, M. (2020). The determinants of employee's performance: A literaure review. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 14-24.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu