___

• Arends, R.I (2012). Learning to teach: 9th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Atasoy, B. (2009). The effect of a conceptual change approach on understanding of sudennts’chemical equilibrium concept.Journal Research and Science & Technologycal Education, 27: 267—282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140903162587 Azwar, S. (2016). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Barniol, Pablo., & Zavala, Genaro (2014). Test of understanding of vectors: A reliable multiple choice vector concept test. Physics Education Research, 10,12-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010121 Brooks, V. (2002). Assessment in secondary school: The new teacher’s Guide to monitoring ,assessment, recording, reporting and accountability. Philadephia: Open University Press Chua, Y. P., & Don, Z. M. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior,29(5),1889-1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.008 Frank, W., & Scherr, R,. (2012) . Interactional processes for stabilizing conceptual coherences in physics. Physical Review Special Topic–Physics Education Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020101 Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and school. Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_1 Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory, principles and criteria: An example from wine ratings and prices. Wine Economics and Policy, 3(1) -9 Hammer, D. (2000). Students resource for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 68 (S1), S52—S59 Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno (2014). Pengembangan Instrument Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PsyTHOTS) Peserta Didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Jeong, H. (2012). A comparative study of score on CB and PBT. Behaviour and information Technology https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.710647 Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen dann Nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Offset. Mardapi, D., Kumaidi. & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukur Hasil Belajar Nirbias dan Terskala Baru. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 15(2): 326-341 Mendiknas (2007). Permendiknas Ri No.20 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016.) The impact of paper based, computer based and mobile based self assessment on students science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behaviour, 55, 1241- 1248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025 Rahayu, D & U. Azizah. (2012). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif Berbasis Komputer dengan Kombinasi Permainan “Who Wants To Be A Chemist” pada Materi Pokok Struktur Atom untuk Kelas X SMA RSBI. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia UNESA. Hal. 41-50 Schraw , Gregory, & Robinson, D.H. (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. New York: Information Age Publishing, Inc ISBN: ISBN-978-1-6173-5506-6 Suparno, Paul., SJ. (2013). Metodologi Pembelajaran Fisika Konstruktivistik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Darma Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Handbook on Conceptual Change. Perth: In Press https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4 Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about teaching methods. Victoria: Acer Press Won,M., Yoon, H., & Treagust, D.F.(2014). Students’ learningstrategies with multiple representations: Explanations of the human breathing mechanism. Sci. Educ.,98(5), 840–866 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21128 Yen, T.S., & Halili, S.H. (2015). Effective teaching of higher-order thinking (hot) in education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(2), 41-47 Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J., (2008). Higher order thinking skills and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181.