Development of Portfolio-Based Modules with Enrichment Model to Improve Creative Thinking in Middle Schoo

One of the objectives of learning Mathematics in Indonesia is for students to get various provisions when facing challenges in the global era. Therefore, the ability to understand is emphasized in the development of thinking processes. Teaching materials are obviously needed to bridge the material so that it is conveyed to students correctly according to the learning objectives. One of the appropriate and necessary teaching materials in Mathematics learning is an Enrichment based portfolio module. The objectives of this research were to find out the condition of learning Mathematics in the Surakarta State Middle School nowadays. The second objective wasto know the development of portfolio learning modules with the Enrichment model to improve creative thinking. The third objective was to determine the effectiveness of the portfolio learning module with the Enrichment model that can improve creative thinking. The type of research used in this research was development research. The instruments used in this research were material expert and media assessment sheets on teaching materials, student response questionnaires and learning outcomes tests. After the teaching material was made, it was then validated by the expert team. Validation was carried out by two material experts and design experts. After the medium was validated and revised, then a user trial was then carried out, namely the trial of small groupsand large groups. Based on the results of these trials, the teaching materials were revised again if weaknesses were found again. Next was the implementation stage of teaching materials for 8th grade students in one of the Surakarta City Middle Schools

___

  • Abidin, Z. dan Walida, S.E. (2014). The model of mathematics e-portfolio assessment for senior high school. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 4 (10), 596-600. Ayllón M.F., Gómez I.A. & Claver J.B. (2016). Mathematical thinking and creativity through mathematical problem posing and solving. Propósitos y Representaciones Ene, 4 (1), 196-218. Beecher M. & Sweeny, S.M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation : One school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19 (3), 502-530). Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. (4th ed). New York & London: LongmanCzura, A. (2013). Implementing portfolio assessment in lower-secondary school. English Language and Literature Teaching, 10 (1), 83-94 Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2009). The systematic design of ınstruction. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Garcia, M.A. (2008). The enrichment triad model: Nurturing creative-productivity among college students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45 (3), 295–302Huda, M. (2015). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka PelajarHusain, G. (2012). Pengaruh Model Quantum Teaching Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Gorontalo: PPs UNG. Ifeoma, O.E. dan Ezeoba, K. (2015). Towards a talent model of curriculum delivery for social change. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (3C), 789-795.Irfan, A. dan Winarti, P. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Pada Mata Kuliah Medan Elektromagnetik I di Jurusan Teknik Elektro Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 2 (3), 543-551Istuningsih,W., Baedhowi,B.,& Sangka,K.B. (2018). The effectiveness of scientific approach using e-module based on learning cycle 7e to improve students’ learning outcome. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3),75-85.Pehkonen, E. (1997). Fostering of mathematical creativity. ZDM International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 29 (3), 63-67. Miller, R. dan Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potensial students from low-ıncome families ın an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 594-627. Ronis, Diane. (2009). Pengajaran Matematika Sesuai Cara Kerja OtakEdisi 2. Jakarta:IndeksSantrock, W. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan Buku 2 Edisi 3. Jakarta:Erlangga Spangenberg, E. D. (2012). Thinking styles of mathematics and mathematical literacy learners: Implications for subject choice. Department of Science and Technology Education, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, 1-12 Sukmadinata, N. S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya Sun, P. K. (2011). Menikmati Belajar Secara Kreatif. Yogyakarta: Samudra BiruSurapranata dan Hatta. (2007). Panduan Penulisan Tes Tertulis Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: Remaja RosdakaryaSurgawi,T., Joebagio,H. & Djono (2019). Development of module on communicative translation material in translation subject. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 373-378.Widiana, I.W. & Jampel, I.W. (2016). Improving students’ creative thinking and achievement through the implementation of multiple intelligence approach with mind mapping. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(3), 246-254. Wulandari, N.F. dan Jailani. (2015). Indonesian students’ mathematics problem solving skill in Pisa and Timss. Proceeding of International Conference On Research, Implementation And Education Of Mathematics And Sciences 2015, Yogyakarta State University, 1991-1998.Vebrian, R., Darmawijoyo, dan Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Tipe TIMSS Menggunakan Konteks Kerajaan Sriwijaya di SMP. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 3 (2), 96-105.