Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia

The aim of the current study is to compare two learning models in quadrilaterallearning. The models are Whole Brain Teaching (WBT) and Brain-Based Learning (BBL). This research is quasi-experimental research with a 2x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the 7th grade of junior high school in Karanganyar Regency with 181 students as the sample, 91 students taught with WBT and 90 students taught with BBL. Data analysis using a two-way ANOVA test with different cells. In this researchindicating that learning models and the students' learning stylehave a significant impact onthequadrilateral learning achievement.The result showed that Fa(9.79)> Ftable (3.89) it means (1) the students who were taught by WBT model had better achievement with student who was taught by BBL model, (2) Fb(25.05)>Ftable(3.05) it means auditory learners have better achievement than visual and kinesthetic , visual learners have achievement than kinesthetic learners, and (3) Fab (0.0197) < Ftable (3.05) it means there is no interaction between the learning model and learning style

___

  • Ahmed, M., & Iliyasu, M. B. (2017). Effect of laboratory activity based method on performance in geometry among junior secondary school students in kastina state, Nigeria. Abacus,The Journal of The Mathematical Association of Nriaige, 42(2), 55–60. Budiyono. (2009). Statistika untuk penelitian. surakarta: Uns Press. Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1259–1274. DePorter, B., & M Hernacki. (2013). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning. Emilda. (2015). Teaching mathematics through ıntegrated brain gym in pair checks of cooperative learning. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science Ver. III, 20(11), 27–31. Gantasala, P. V., & Gantasala, S. B. (2009). Influence of learning styles. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 169–184.Handayani, B. S., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). Model brain based learning (BBL) and whole brain teaching (WBT) in learning. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 153. Jensen, E. (2008). Brain based learning: The new paradigm of teaching second-edition (2nd ed.). usa: crowin press. Kaur, J. (2013). Effectiveness of brain based learning strategies on enhancement of life skills among primary school students with internal and external locus of control. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(6), 128–143.Kharsati, M. P. D., & G.S, D. P. (2017). Whole brain teaching. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(06), 76–83. Ministry of Education and Culture Indonesia. (2018). National examination report. Retrieved from hasilun.puspendik.kemendikbud.go.id Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technologypedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Educ, 5(21), 509–523. Pangadongan, F. V. (2015). Konsepsi Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segiempat Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. 1001–1008. Pradhita Yudhi Astri, T., Gunarhadi, G., & Riyadi, R. (2018). Numbered-board quiz with tgt to ımprove students’ science achievement based on learning motivation. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(4), 68–76. Prahmana, R. C. I., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). The hypothetical learning trajectory on research in mathematics education using research-based learning. Pedagogika, 123(3), 42–54. Priyono. (2018). The implementation of PAIKEM (Active, innovative, creative, effective, and exiting learning) and conventional learning method to improve student learning results. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(2), 124–137. Purwanti, D., Gunarhadi., & Musadad, A. A. (2019). The effect of local-based 2013 curriculum implementation on students’ environmental awareness. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(1), 65–75.Putra, F., Kusmayadi, A., & Sujadi, I. (2014). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT Berbantuan Software CABRI 3D Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(8), 816–827. Putri, M. E., Mardiyana., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2019). The effect of application of react learning strategies on mathematics learning achievements: empirical analysis on learning styles of junior high school students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 231–237. Ramlah, F. D. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Keaktifan Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika (Survey Pada SMP Negeri di Kecamatan Klari Kabupaten Karawang). Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi. Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi, 1(3), 68–75. Schott, D. (2014). Context-dependent statements and consequences for the mathematical education of engineeringstudents. World Trans. on Engng. and Technol. Educ, 12(3), 437–442. Simsek, Y. (2017). The evaluation of the application of transported education by teachers. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(1), 41–48.Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya (5th ed.). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. Stenberg, R. (1997). Thinking Styles. cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2017). Mathematics instruction, problems, challenges and opportunities: A case study in Manokwari Regency, Indonesia. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3), 287–291.Willis, J. (2007). Brain-based teaching strategies for ımproving students’ memory, learning, and test-taking success. Childhood Education, 83(5), 310. Winarso, W., & Karimah, S. A. (2017). The influence of implementation brain-friendly learning through the whole brain teaching to students’ response and creative character in learning mathematics. Ssrn, (October).