Avrupa’da Bir Göçmen Entegrasyonu Politikası Ayrımcılıkla Mücadele

Çalışmanın amacı, Dünya genelinde meydana gelen göç hareketleriyle bağlantılı olarak artan göçmen ayrımcılığının seçilmiş Avrupa ülkeleri üzerinden karşılaştırmalı analizini gerçekleştirmektir. Hedef ülkelerin seçilmesinde Göçmen Entegrasyon Politikası Endeksi/The Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) sınıflandırma tablosu esas alınmış olup ilgili veriler Avrupa İstatistik Ofisi (EUROSTAT) çalışmalarıyla desteklenmiştir. Çalışma nitel bir araştırma yöntemi olan doküman analizine dayandırılmıştır. Ayrımcılıkla mücadele konusunda yapılan çalışmalara ek olarak ilgili konuda saygın kişi, kurum ve kuruluşların bağlantılı çalışmalarına da yer verilmiştir. Göçmen ayrımcılığıyla ilgili karşılaştırmalı veriler ortaya koyan ve entegrasyon süreçlerine ışık tutan çalışmanın artan göç ikliminde göçmenlerin yaşam kalitelerinin artırılmasına ve göç konusundaki kamu politikalarının uygulanma süreçlerine fayda sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Araştırma sonucunda farklı kategorilerden seçilmiş 4 farklı ülkenin (İsveç, Fransa, İspanya, İsviçre) MIPEX verileriyle uygulama alanı arasındaki sıralamalarının orantısız bir şekilde değiştiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre ilgili 4 ülkede AB vatandaşlarına uygulanan standartların göçmen bireylere uygulanmadığı anlaşılmıştır. Göçmen bireylerin ülkelerde sosyal dışlanma başta olmak üzere sosyal ve ekonomik sorunları yaşadıkları sonucuna varılmıştır.

A Policy of Migrant Integration in Europe: Combating Discrimination

The aim of the study is to perform a comparative analysis of the increasing discrimination of immigrants in connection with the migration movements occurring around the world, through selected European countries. The Migrant Integration Policy Index/The Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) classification table was taken as a basis in the selection of the target countries, and the relevant data were supported by the studies of the European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT). The study is based on document analysis, which is a qualitative research method. In addition to the studies on the fight against discrimination, related studies of respected individuals, institutions and organizations are also included. Will contribute to improving the quality of life of immigrants and the implementation processes of public policies on immigration in the increasing migration climate. As a result of the research, it was concluded that the rankings of 4 different countries (Sweden, France, Spain, Switzerland) selected from different categories between MIPEX data and application area changed disproportionately. According to the results obtained, it has been understood that the standards applied to EU citizens in the relevant 4 countries are not applied to immigrant individuals. It has been concluded that immigrant individuals experience social and economic problems, especially social exclusion, in countries.

___

  • AİDA. (2020). Country report: France. Erişim adresi: https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/AIDA-FR_2020update.pdf.
  • AİDA. (2021). Country report: Spain. Erişim adresi: https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AIDA-ES_2021update.pdf
  • Amnesty International. (2022). Discrimination. Erişim adresi: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/discrimination/ Avrupa Birliği Temel Haklar Ajansı. (2018). İkinci Avrupa Birliği azınlıklar ve ayrımcılık anketi. Lüksemburg: Avrupa Birliği Resmî Yayınlar Ofisi.
  • Bartham, D. ve Poros, M. (2017). Göç meselesinde temel kavramlar. Ankara: Hece yayınları.
  • Cabrera, P. J. ve Malgesini, G. (2002). Mıgratıons and homelessness ın spaın natıonal report. Spanish Red Cross.
  • Castelli, F. (2018). Drivers of migration: why do people move? Journal of Travel Medicine, 25(1), 1-7.
  • Castles, S. ve Miller, M. J. (2008). Göçler çağı. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi yayınları.
  • COE. (2020). News of the European Commission against racism and ıntolerance. Erişim adresi: https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/-/report-on-racism-in-switzerland-improve-support-for-victims-and-deal-more-effectively-with-discriminati-1
  • COE. (t.y). Discrimination. Erişim adresi: http://www.eycb.coe.int/compasito/chapter_5/pdf/3.pdf
  • COE. (t.y.a). Measurement and indicators of integration. Erişim adresi: https://www.coe.int/t/dg3/migration/archives/documentation/Series_Community_Relations/Measurement_indicators_integration_en.pdf
  • Cohen, A., O.Ekwueme, P., Sacotte, K. A., Bajwa, L., Gilpin, S. ve Garris, N. H. (2021). “Melanincholy”: a qualitative exploration of youth media use, vicarious racism, and perceptions of health. Journal Of Adolescent Health, 69(2), 288-293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.128
  • Çamaş, G. G. ve Meşe, G. (2016). Sosyal hiyerarşi: cinsel şiddet mitlerini anlamak, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(78), 62-74.
  • Çayır, K. (2012). Gruplararası ilişkiler bağlamında ayrımcılık. K. Çayır, ve M. A. Ceyhan (Ed.), Ayrımcılık: Çok Boyutlu Yaklaşımlar (s. 5-15) içinde İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi yayınları.
  • Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
  • EU. (2010). Declaration of the European Ministerial Conference on ıntegration. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/declaration-european-ministerial-conference-integration- zaragoza-15-16-april-2010_en
  • EU. (2012). Charter Of Fundamental Rights Of The European Union. Erişim adresi: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT
  • EU. (2017). Migrant ıntegration. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EU. (2021). Institutional racism in the Netherlands. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/institutional-racism-netherlands_de
  • European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2020). Second european union minorities and discrimination survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EUROSTAT. (2021). Migrant integration statistics - at risk of poverty and social exclusion. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Migrant_integration_statistics_-_at_risk_of_poverty_and_social_exclusion#People_at_risk_of_poverty_or_social_exclusion adresinden alındı
  • EUROSTAT. (2021a). Glossary: persons living in households with low work intensity. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Persons_living_in_households_with_low_work_intensity
  • EUROSTAT. (2021b). Glossary: Overcrowding rate. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Overcrowding_rate
  • EUROSTAT. (2021c). Foreign citizens overburdened by housing costs more than national citizens. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20210209-1
  • EUROSTAT. (2022). Employment rate, by citizenship. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/sdg_08_30a
  • EUROSTAT. (2022a). People living in households with very low work intensity by broad group of citizenship Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ILC_LVHL15N/default/table?lang=en&category=livcon.ilc.ilc_lv.ilc_lvhl
  • EUROSTAT. (2022b). Overcrowding rate by age, sex and broad group of citizenship. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ILC_LVHO15/default/table?lang=en&category=livcon.ilc.ilc_lv.ilc_lvho.ilc_lvho_or
  • EUROSTAT. (2022c). Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ILC_LVHO25/default/table?lang=en&category=livcon.ilc.ilc_lv.ilc_lvho.ilc_lvho_hc adresinden alındı
  • EUROSTAT. (2022d). Young people neither in employment nor in education and training (neet), By Citizenship. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_20a/default/table?lang=en
  • EUROSTAT. (2022e). Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion by group of citizenship. Erişim adresi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ilc_peps05n/default/table?lang=e
  • Gauran, M. ve Johnston, H. (2018). Moving from welfare to work: low work ıntensity households and the quality of supportive services. nesc. Erişim adresi: https://publicpolicy.ie/downloads/perspectives/2019/Perspectives_1_Moving_From_Welfare_to_Work.pdf
  • Gül, İ. I., ve Kara, U. (2011). Ayrımcılık yasağı eğitim rehberi. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
  • Hanke, P. ve Heıne, K. (2015). Migratıon and systems competıtıon: a constiutional economics perspective. University Of Thomas Law Journal, 12(1).
  • Human Right Watch. (2021). Erişim adresi: https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/10/07/enforced-misery/degrading-treatment-migrant-children-and-adults-northern-france
  • ILO, IOM, OHCHR (2001). International migration, racism, discrimination and xenophobia. Geneva: UNHCR.
  • IOM. (2021). World mıgration report 2022. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
  • Isom, D. A., Mikell, T. C. ve Boehme, H. M. (2021). White America, threat to the status quo, andaffiliation with the alt-right: a qualitative approach. Sociological Spectrum, 1-16.
  • Kaya, E. E. ve Özcan, M. S. (2021). International Migration and The Rise of Islamophobia as A "New Racism" Type. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 3091.
  • Kendi, I. X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning the definitive history of racist ıdeas in america. New York: Nation Books.
  • Meda, J. B. (2010). Homelessness among Migrants in Spain. Policy Review, 4, 139-154.
  • MIPEX. (2020a). Sweden. migrant ıntegration policy ındex: Erişim adresi: https://www.mipex.eu/sweden
  • MIPEX. (2020b). Anti-discrimination. migrant ıntegration policy ındex: Erişim adresi: https://www.mipex.eu/anti-discrimination
  • MIPEX. (2020c). France. migrant ıntegration policy ındex: Erişim adresi: https://www.mipex.eu/france
  • MIPEX. (2020d). Spain. migrant ıntegration policy ındex: Erişim adresi: https://www.mipex.eu/spain
  • MIPEX. (2020e). Switzerland. migrant ıntegration policy ındex: Erişim adresi: https://www.mipex.eu/switzerland Morris, M. ve Hochlaf, D. (2019). Measuring the benefits of ıntegration the value of tacklıng skills underutilisation. London: The Institute For Public Policy Research.
  • Nebel, J. M. (2015). Status quo bias, rationality and conservatism about value. Ethics, 125(2), 449-476.
  • Nell, I. (2009). The tears of xenophobia: preaching and violence from a south afrıcan perspective. Practical Theology in South Africa, 24(2), 229-247.
  • O’Rorke, G. (2016). Characteristics and implications of the level of household joblessness in Ireland. Erişim adresi: https://igees.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Household-joblessness-paper-final.pdf
  • OECD. (2018). Indıcators of ımmıgrant ıntegratıon. Erişim adresi: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264307216-8-en.pdf?expires=1651239496&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A422348FE7F5DC521C88492F9373385F adresinden alındı
  • OECD. (2019). Indicators of ımmigrant ıntegration. Erişim adresi: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264307216-5-en.pdf?expires=1651134464&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=27700AAB0B1749FEB2AC88AD3C1905BE
  • Pan, Z. ve Kosicki, G. (1996). Assessing news media ınfluences on the formation of whites' racial policy preferences. Communication Research, 23(2), 147- 178.
  • Panara, M. (2021). France: 'Precarious' employment conditions for refugees. Erişim adresi: https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/37202/france-precarious-employment-conditions-for-refugees
  • Penninx, R. ve Mascareñas, B. G. (2016). The concept of ıntegration as an analytical tool and as a policy concept. B.
  • Garcés, ve M. R. Penninx (Ed.), İntegration processes and policies in europe contexts, levels and actors (s. 11-29) içinde Barcelona: IMISCOE.
  • QUEENS University. (2022). The multiculturalism policy ındex. Erişim adresi: https://www.queensu.ca/mcp
  • Quillian, L. (2006). New approaches to understandıng racial prejudıce and discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 299–328.
  • Raphael, S. ve Ronconi, L. (2007). The effects of labor market competıtion with ımmıgrants on the wages and employment of natives. Du Bois Review, 4(2), 413–432.
  • Rodríguez-Planas, N. ve Nollenberger, N. (2016). Labor market integration of new immigrants in Spain. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 1-15.
  • Schramm, F. R. (2015). Encyclopedia of global bioethics. Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_146-1
  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: studies and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tataru, G. F. (2019). Migration – an overview on terminology, causes and effects. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 7(2), 10-29.
  • The Guardian (2020). Spain Dismantles 'Deplorable' Migrant Camp İn Gran Canaria. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/30/spain-dismantles-makeshift-migrant-camp-gran-canaria-canary-islands.
  • UN. (T.B). Policies to encourage ıntegratıon naturalızatıon and return of migrants. Erişim adresi: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/InternationalMigrationPolicies2013/Report%20PDFs/i_Ch_3.pdf
  • UNHRC. (2019). Access to educatıon for refugee and mıgrant chıldren ın europe. Erişim adresi: https://www.unhcr.org/neu/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2019/09/Access-to-education-europe-19.pdf
  • Vrsanska, I., Kavicky, V. ve Jangl, Š. (2017). Xenophobia – the cause of terrorism in a democratic society. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 168-171.
  • Westlake, D. (2021). Annual Data for the Multiculturalism Policy Index For Immigrant Minorities. https://www.queensu.ca/mcp/sites/mcpwww/files/uploaded_files/immigrantminorities/Annual%20Data/Annual%20data%20MCPs%20for%20Immigrant%20Minorities%20Evidence%20Document%201960-2020.pdf adresinden alındı
  • Wietmarschen, H. V. (2021). What is social hierarchy. Nous, 9. 1-20.
  • Wilders, G. (Yöneten). (2008). Fitna [Sinema Filmi].
  • World Bank. (2018). Groundswell: preparing for ınternal climate migration. Erişim adresi: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29461