Intörn Hemsirelik Ögrencilerinin Proaktif Kisilik Özelligi ile Çatısma Çözme Yaklasımı Arasındaki Iliskinin Incelenmesi

Amaç: Bu çalısmanın amacı intern hemsirelik ögrencilerinin proaktifkisilik özelligi ile çatısma çözme yaklasımı arasındaki iliskinin incelenmesidir.Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı tipte bir arastırmadır. Veriler Mayıs 2014’te dördüncüsınıf intörn hemsirelik ögrencileri ile yüz yüze görüsme yöntemiyleelde edilmistir.Bulgular: Katılımcıların %45.8’i klinik ortamda en az bir kez hemsire,hasta, doktor ve ögrenci hemsire ile çatısma yasadıgını belirtmistir.Hemsirelik ögrencilerinin proaktif kisilik puan ortalaması orta düzeyde(54.1±8.06) bulunmustur. Proaktif kisilik ölçek puan ortalaması 60’ınaltında olanlarda kisiler arası çatısma çözme ölçeginin alt ölçeklerinden“yüzlesme”, 60’ın üstünde olanlarda “kendini açma” puan ortalamasıdigerlerine göre daha yüksek bulunmustur ancak arasındaki fark istatikselolarak anlamlı bulunmamıstır.Sonuç: Proaktif kisilik özelligini gösterme ile çatısma çözme yaklasımlarıarasında anlamlı bir iliski bulunmamıstır ancak proaktif kisiliközelligi yüksek olan ögrencilerin daha fazla iletisim becerileri kullanarakçatısma çözme yaklasımlarından “kendini açma” yaklasımını kullandıgısaptanmıstır. Ögretim elemanları tarafından klinik staj öncesi,intörn hemsirelik ögrencilerinin kendini daha rahat dile getirebilbildigiproaktif kisilik özelliginin desteklenmesi ve çatısma yasadıgında akılcıçözüm yollarının ögretilmesi önerilmektedir.

The Relationship Between a Proactive Personality of Intern Nursing Students and Con ict Resolution

Aim: To examine the relationship between proactive personality characteristics of intern nursing students and con ict resolution. Methods: This is a descriptive study. Data were collected by face-toface interviews with 96 intern nursing students in May 2014. Results: Of the participants, 45.8% stated they had con icted with nurses, patients, doctors and student nurses at least once in the clinical setting. The average proactive personality scores of the nursing students were found to be moderate (54.1 ± 8.06). Of the proactive personality scale score averages below 60, a "confrontation" approach was found among the subscales of the interpersonal con ict resolution scale; of the ones above 60, the "self-disclosure" point average was found to be higher than the others, but the difference between them was not statistically signi cant. Conclusion: There was no signi cant relationship between demonstrating a proactive personality and con ict resolution approaches. However, students with high proactive personality characteristics were found to use a "self-disclosure" approach to con ict resolution by using more communication skills. It is recommended that educators encourage more proactive behaviors and teach rational solutions when there is a con ict in order for intern nursing students to express themselves more easily before clinical internships.

PDF

___

1 . Ironside PM, Mcnelis AM, Ebright P. Clinical education in nursing: rethinking learning in practice settings. Nurs Outlook. 2014;62(3):185- 91. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
2 . Mamchur C, Myrick F. Preceptorship and interpersonal conflict: a multidisciplinary study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2003;43(2):188- 96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02693.x.
3 . Günüsen NP, Üstün B. Hemsirelik ögrencilerinin problem çözme beceri düzeyleri ile kontrol odagı arasındaki iliski. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemsirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi. 2011;4(2):72-7. Available from: https://dspace.deu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/12345/4587.
4 . Kırsan M, Korhan EA. Hemsirelik ögrencilerinin klinik ögretimde yasadıkları etik sorun deneyimleri. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Etigi-Hukuku- Tarihi Dergisi. 2017;25(1):20-7. doi: 10.5336/mdethic.2016-52994.
5 . Ates D, Kaplan A, Öztürk S, ve arkadasları Hemsirelik bölümü ögrencilerinde klinik stajda mobbing. Erciyes Üniversitesi Saglık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;2(1):30-8. Available from: http://sbfedergi. erciyes.edu.tr/article/view/1051000094
6 . College of Nurses of Ontario. Conflitict Prevention and Management, Practice Guideline. Pub. No. 47004. Toronto; 2009. Available from: https://www.cno.org/globalassets/docs/prac/47004_con ict_prev.pdf.
7 . Hamouda GM, Taha EE, Hashish EA, Cconflict resolution strategies used by nursing educators: students’ perspective. Journal of American Science. 2012;8(2):209-16. Available from: http://www. jofamericanscience.org/journals/am-sci/am0802/.
8 . Pettrey L. Who let the dogs out? Managing conflict with courage and skill. Critical Care Nurse. 2003;23(1):21-4. Available from: http:// eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=9&sid=c0660f6d- 21e2-437c-af9e-57a759f4ca0d%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
9 . Admi H. Nursing students' stres during the initial clinical experience. Journal of Nursing Education. 1997;36(7):323-7. doi: 10.3928/0148- 4834-19970901-07.
10 . Harvey S, Blouin C, Stout D. Proactive personality as a moderator of outcomes for young workers experiencing conflict at work. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;40(5):1063-74. doi: 10.1016/j. paid.2005.09.021.
11 . Bateman TS, Crant JM. The proactive component of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1993;14(2):103-18. doi: 10.1002/Job.4030140202.
12 . Becherer RC, Fohn G. The proactive personality disposition and entrepreneurial behavior among small company presidents. Journal of Small Business Management. 1999;37(1):28-36. Available from: https:// search.proquest.com/docview/220955939?pq-origsite=gscholar.
13 . Duygulu E. Algılanan kurumsal görünüm, proaktif kisilik özelligi ve is kurma (girisimcilik) tutumu: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü ögrencileri üzerine bir inceleme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2008;2:95-120. Available from: http:// kisi.deu.edu.tr/ethem.duygulu/Giri%C5%9Fimcilik%20ekolleri%20 ve%20i%C5%9F%20kurma%20niyetii.pdf
14 . Brown S, O’Donnell E. Proactive personality and goal orientatıon: a model of directed effort. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and conflict. 2011;15(1):103-20. Available from: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=8988010c-8e7a-401b-854f- 76212c471a4b%40sessionmgr120.
15 . Goldstein SB. Construction and validation of aconflict communication scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999;29(9):1803-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00153.x.
16 . Arslan C. Kisilerarası çatısma çözme ve problem çözme yaklasımlarının yükleme karmasıklıgı açısından incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2005;14:75-93. Available from: http:// acikerisim.selcuk.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/ handle/123456789/8296/190103.pdf?sequence=1.
17 . Akın A, Abacı R, Kaya M, Arıcı N. Kısaltılmıs Proaktif Kisilik Ölçegi’nin (KPÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirligi. Famagusta, Cyprus: Paper presented at the ICES11 International Conference on Educational Sciences; June 22-25, 2011.
18 . Sportsman S, Hamilton P. conflict management styles in the health professions. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2007;23(3):157-66. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.01.010.
19 . Öz F, Hiçdurmaz D. Hemsirelik ögrencilerinin kisilerarası çatısmaları çözme yaklasımları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Saglık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemsirelik Dergisi. 2012;19(1):1-15. Available from: http://dergipark. ulakbim.gov.tr/hunhemsire/article/viewFile/5000052979/5000050305
20 . Andrews GJ, Brodie DA, Andrews JP, et al. Professional roles and communications in clinical placements: a qualitative study of nursing students' perceptions and some models for practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006;43(7):861-74. doi:10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2005.11.008.
21 . Kantek F, Gezer N. Conflict in schools: student nurses’ conflict management styles. Nurse Education Today. 2009;29(1):100-7. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.07.007.
22 . Wang Y, Cullen K L, Yao X, Li Y. Personality, freshmen proactive social behavior, and college transition: predictors beyond academic strategies. Learning and Individual Differences. 2013;23:205-12. doi: 10.1016/j. lindif.2012.09.010.
23 . Lee SM, Peterson SJ. Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business. 2000;35(4):401-16. doi: 10.1016/S1090-9516(00)00045-6.
24 . Howe N, Strauss W. The next 20 years: how customer and workforce attitudes will evolve. Harvard Business Review. 2007;85(7-8):41-52. Available from: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=c0660f6d-21e2-437c-af9e- 57a759f4ca0d%40pdc-v-sessmgr01
25 . Yasa E, Bozyigit S. Y kusagı tüketicilerinin cep telefonu ve GSM operatörleri tercihi: Mersin ilindeki üniversite ögrencilerinin tercihlerini belirlemeye yönelik pilot bir arastırma. Cag University Journal of Social Sciences. 2012;9(1):29-46. Available from: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/ eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=651ce3d8-9e2d-4907-9fe3- 1b228a2b5853%40sessionmgr4010
26 . Bass J. Chief millennial officer: ıt’s time to write the job description. Nurse Leader. 2012;10(5):48-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mnl.2012.02.005.
27 . Heppner PP, Krauskoph CJ. The integration of personal problem solving processes within counselling. The Counselling Psychologist. 1987;15(3):371-447. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ pdf/10.1177/0011000087153001
28 . Hamouda GM, Taha EE. Hashish EA. conflict resolution strategies used by nursing educators: students’ perspective. Journal of American Science. 2012;8(2):209-16.
29 . Spickerman S, Brown ST. Student conflict management: Before and after instruction. Nurse Educ. 1991;16(6):11-7. Available from: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1754141
30 . Moore CW. The mediation process, Practical strategies for resolving conflict. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996.
31 . Oetzel JG, Tıng-Toomey S. Face concerns in interpersonal conflict. a cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research. 2003;30(6):599-624. doi: 10.1177/0093650203257841.