Evaluating optical networks' business model

Günümüzde optik ağların iş modeli çeşitli katmanlardan oluşmaktadır: Son kullanıcılar, Servis Sağlayıcılar, Buluşma noktaları ve Taşıyıcılar. Bu katmanlar arasında işbirliğinin, uyumun çok alt seviyelerde olması ve herbirisinin kendi alanlarındaki teknolojik gelişmeleri diğer katmanları gözetmeden uygulamaları iş modelinde eksiklere ve hatalara sebep olmaktadır. Bugünkü modelin en başta gelen problemleri : 1) optimize edilmemiş topolojiler, 2) Düşük akıcılık, 3) Kaynak israfı, 4) Birlikte çalışma güçlüğü olarak sıralanabilir. Bu çalışmada bugünün iş modelinin eksik ve kusurları ile başedebilmek için yeni bir model sunulmuştur. Tümleşik Tarafsız Topoloji Eniyileştiriciler ağ katmanları arasında görev yapan ticari işlevi de bulunan yeni bir katmandır. Bu katman servis sağlayıcılar ve taşıyıcı kuruluşlar arasında, kullanılacak ağın kiralanmasından, üzerinde akan trafiğin görüntülenmesine ve topolojinin eniyileştirilmesine kadar görev yapar. Veri trafiğinin, hangi taşıyıcı kuruluşun hangi ağ parçası üzerinden gerçekleştireceğine bu katman karar verir ve sürdürür.

Today’s business model comprises of several layers: End users, Internet Service Providers (ISP), exchange points, and carriers. Arbitrary technological upgrades and absence of interaction in this layered business model, have led to critical system shortcomings. Foremost issues caused by this model are: 1.) unoptimized topology, 2.) low-liquidity, 3.) waste of resources, 4.) reduced interoperability. We introduce a new and novel concept for coping with the issues and shortcomings of today’s business model. Integrated Neutral Topology Optimizer (INTO) is an over all arbiter layer with commercial functionality. This layer operates with ISPs and carriers during leasing process and continually monitors the traffic to optimize the bandwidth usage. Inter-and-intra carrier connections are made and maintained according to the decisions of this layer.

Kaynakça

1.Gencata, A., Singhal N. and Mukherjee B, Overview of Optical Communication Networks: Current and Future Trends, University of California, (2002).

2.Mukherjee, B., R&D Priorities and Challenges for Optical Networking: Migrating Theory to Practice, preprint (2002).

3.Gençata, A. and Mukherjee B., Virtual Topology Adaptation for WDM Mesh Networks Under Dynamic Traffic, IEEE/ACM Transactions on networking, (2003) Vol. 11, No,2.

4.Bhatia R., et al. Algorithmic Aspects of Bandwidth Trading, Bell Labs. (2003).

5.Level 3 Communications, Inc. www.level3.com

6.Nortel Communications, http://www.nortel.com

7.AT&T Communications, http://www.att.com

8.Sprint Communications, http://www.sprint.com

9.LucentCommunications,http://www.lucent.com

10.Band-x, www.band-x.com

11.Arbinet, www.arbinet.com

12.Telco Exchange, www.telcoexchange.com

13.Bandwidth Market, http://www.bandwidthmarket.com

14.Aboulfadl M., Gupta A., Pradhan R., Kalyanaraman S., A Spot Pricing Framework To Enable Pricing And Risk Managementof Inter-Domain Assured Bandwidth Services, Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (2002).

15.Enron Co., www.enron.com.

16.Cheliotis G., Bandwidth Trading in the Real World: Findings and Implications for Commodities Brokerage, Research Report, IBM Research Zurich Research Laboratory Switzerland, (2000).

17.Chiu, Samuel, S. and Crametz, Jean-Pascal, Taking Advantage of The Emerging Bandwidth Exchange Market, White paper, RateXchange Ltd. (1999).

18.Chiu, Samuel, S. and Crametz, Jean-Pascal, Arbitrage: surprising pricing relationship. Risk Magazine, Bandwidth Special Report, (2000).

19.Arte, Kai, Bandwidth Derivatives under Network Arbitrage, Master of thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, (2002).

20.Young, S., Harman, N. and Harding, E., Trading Telecoms as a Commodity, White paper, Ovum, (2001).

21.Kenyon C., Cheliotis G., Stochastic Models for Telecom Commodity Prices, Computer Networks 36, 533-555, (2001).

22.Phone+Magazine http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/lcltrade 3.htm

23.Middle East Technical University, http://modems.metu.edu.tr/annexpril.html.

24.Inter Exchange, www.interexchange.org.

25.www.canaria.ca.

26.Broker N., Hrishikesh S., Management Challenges in the Optical Telecommunications Industry, Research report, (2002).

27.Keppo, J., Price of point-to-point bandwidth contracts, University of Michigan, (2003).

28.Gencata, A., Topology and bandwidth adaptation in optical WDM backbone networks with dynamic traffic, Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey, (2003).

29.Hu X.D., Jia X., Zhang Mu-H. and Shuai T.P. Multicast Routing and Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks with Limited Drop-offs, IEEE INFOCOM (2004).

30.Ramaswami R. and Sivarajan K. N., Routing and wavelength assignment in all-optical networks , IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, (1995) vol. 3, pp. 489-500.

31.Mokhtar A. and Azizoglu M., Adaptive wavelength routing in all-optical networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 6, pp. (1998)197-206.

Kaynak Göster