___

• Abu-Qaoudt, H. , Skirvin, R . M., Chevreau, E. 1990. In vitro separation of chimeral pears into their c omponent genotypes. Euphytica 48: 189-196.
• Ardian, A . S. 1997. Stability of cytochimeras of Allium wakegi Araki during in vivo and in vitro propagation. Sc ientia Horticulturae 71 (1 -2): 93 -102.
• Arisumi, T. , Frazier, L. C. 1968. Cytological and morphological evidence for the single -cell origin of vegetatively propagated shoots in thirteen species of Saintpaulia treated with colchicine. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 93: 679-685
• Binding, H., W itt, D ., Monzer J., Mordhorst G. , Kollmann, R. 1987 . Plant cell graft chimeras obtained by co-culture of isolated protoplasts . Protoplasma 141:64-73 Broertjes , C . , Keen A. 1980. Adventitious shoots: Do they develop from one cell? Euphytica 29: 73 – 87.
• Burge , G . K. , Morgan, Ed R ., Seelye , J . F. 2002. Opportunities for synthe tic plant chimeral breeding: Past and future . Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 70: 13 –21 .
• Burk, L. G.1975. Clonal and selective propagation of tobacco from leaves. Plt. Sci. Lett. 4: 149-154.
• Cammareri, M., Errico1 , A ., Filippone , E ., Esposito, S. , Conicella , C. 2002. Induction of variability in chimeric Aster cordifolius ‘White Elegans’ through somaclonal variation Euphytica 128: 19–25 .
• Canli, A . F.2003.A Review on thornless roses. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6(19):1712-1719.
• Canli, A . F., Skirvin, R.M. 2003. Separation on thornless rose chimeras Rosa genotypes Biological Sciences 6(19):1644-1648 .
• Canli, F. A ., Skirvin, R . M. 2008 In vitro separation of a rose chimera. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 95:353 –361 .
• Carlson, PS., Chaleff, RS. 1974 Heterogeneous association of cells formed in vitro. In Ledoux L (ed) Genetic Manipulations with Plant Materials (pp 245 –261) Plenum Press, New York.
• Chen, L. P., Ge , Y. M. , Zhu, X. Y. 2006. Artificial synthesis of interspecific chimeras between tuber mustard ( Brassica juncea) and cabbage ( Brassica oleracea) and cytological analysis . Plant Cell Rep 25: 907 –913 .
• Clayberg, CD .1975. Insect resistance in a graft- induced periclinal chimera of tomato. HortScience 10: 13 –15 .
• Elliott, F. C.1958. Plant Breeding and Cytogenetics. McGraw- Hill Book Company, inc. p:395 .
• Fourré , J -L, Berger, P., Niquet, L. , André , P. 1997 Somatic embryogenesis and somaclonal variation in Norway spruce: morphogenetic, cytogenetic and molecular approaches Theor Appl Genet 94: 159–169.
• Geier , T. , Sangwan, R.S. 1996 Histology and chimeral segregation reveal cell- specific differences in the competence for shoot regeneration and Agrobacterium- mediated transformation in Kohleria internode explants Plant Cell Reports 15 (6): 386-390.
• George , E. F. 1993. Plant Propagation By Tissue Culture, Exegetics Ltd., Edington, Wilts. BA13 4QG, England p:574.
• Goffreda , JC. , Szymkowiak, EJ . , Sussex, IM., Mutschler MA. 1990. Chimeric tomato plants show tha t aphid resistance and triacylglucose production are epidermal autonomous characters. Plant Cell 2: 643 –649.
• Hake , S. 2001 . Transcription factors on the move. Trends Genet. 17:2–3 .
• Hall, H. K ., Quaz , M. H., Skırvın, R. M. 1986. Isolatıon of a pure Thornle ss Loganberry by merıstem tip c ulture . Euphytica 35 . 1039–1044.
• Hırata , Y ., Yagıshıta , N. , Sugımoto, M., Yamamoto, K . 1990. İntervarietal chimera formation in cabbage . Journal of Breeding 40: (4) 419- 423.
• Hirata , Y ., Motegi, T., Takeda , Y ., Morikawa , K . 2001 . Induction of cytoplasmic male sterility in the seed progeny derived from artificially- synthesized interspecific chimera in Brassica. Euphytica 117(2):143 –149.
• Jorgensen, CA. 1927. A periclinal tomato- potato chimera. Hereditas.10: 293 – 301 .
• Li, M. Y.2005 . Observation of high- frequency occurrence of chimeral adventitious shoots in tissue culture from the chimeral tissues of Pelargonium zonale . Hortscıence 40 ( 5 ); 1461 - 1463 .
• Lindsay, GC ., Hopping, ME ., Binding, H ., Burge , GK . 1995 Graft chimeras and soma tic hybrids for new cultivars. NZ J. Bot.( 33 ):79–92.
• Lineberger, R .D.2007.http://aggie - horticulture.tamu.edu/tisscult/chimera s/ chimera.html.
• Marcotrigiano, M. 1986. Experimentally synthesized plant. chimeras 3. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the flowers of interspecific Nicotiana chimeras. Ann. Bot. 57: 435 –442
• Marcotrigiano, M., Gouin, FR . 1984. Experimentally synthesized plant chimeras 2. A comparison of in vitro and in vivo techniques for the production of interspecific Nicotiana chimeras. Ann. Bot. 54: 513 –521 .
• Marcotrigiano, M., Gouin, FR . 1984a . Experimentally synthesized plant chimeras 1. In vitro recovery of Nicotiana tabacum L. chimeras from mixed callus cultures. Ann. Bot. 54: 503 –511.
• McPheeters , K ., Skirvin, R . M. 1983. Histoge nic layer manipulation in chimeral 'Thornless Evergreen' trailing blackberry. Euphytica 32: 351 -360.
• Neilson- Jones , W. 1969. Plant Chimeras, 2nd edition. Methuen, London.
• Noguchi, T ., Hirata , Y ., Yagishita , N . 1992. Intervarietal and interspecific chimera formation by in vitro-graft culture in Brassica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 727 –732.
• Noguchi, T ., Hirata , Y. 1994.Vegetative and floral characteristics of interspecific Brassica chimeras produced by in vitro grafting. Euphytica 73: 273 –280.
• Schepper, S. D ., Leus , L. , Mertens , M., Debergh, P. , Bockstaele , EV. , Loose , M. D . 2001 . Somatic polyploidy and its consequences for flower coloration and flower morphology in azalea Plant cell rep 20:583 –590.
• Sessions , A ., Yanofsky, MF., Weigel, D. 2000. Cell-cell signaling and movement by the floral transcription factors LEAFY and APETALA1. Science 289: 779–781 .
• Stewart, RN ., Dermen, H.1970. Somatic genetic analysis of the apical layers of chimeral sports in Chrysanthemum by experimental production of adventitious shoots. Amer. J. Bot. 57 (9): 1061 -1071.
• Stewart, RN, Meyer, FG ., Dermen, H . 1972. Camellia+‘Daisy Eagleson’, a graft chimera of Camellia sasanqua and C. japonica. Am. J. Bot. 59: 515 – 524.
• Szymkowiak, EJ ., Sussex, IM. 1996. W hat chımeras can tellus about plant de velopment. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996. 47:351 –76.
• Tilney-Bassett, R. A. E. 1963. The structure of periclinal chimeras. Heredity 18: 265 -285 .
• Yamaguchi, H ., Shimizu, · A. , Hase , Y ., Degi, K. , Tanaka , A. , Morishita , T. 2009.Mutation induction with ion beam irradiation of lateral buds of chrysanthemum and analysis of chimeric structure of induced mutants . Euphytica 165:97 –103 .
• Yentür , S.1995 . Bitki Anatomisi, apikal örgütlenme kavramının evülüsyonu, İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, sayı:3808 , p:560.
• Zalewska , M. , Lema -Ruminska , J . , Miler , N. 2007. In vitro propagation using adventitious buds technique as a source of new variability in chrysanthemum . Scientia Horticulturae 113 70–73 .
• Zhu, X . Y ., Zhao, M, Ma , S ., Ge Y , M., Zhang, M. F., Chen, L. P. 2007 . Induction and origin of adventitious shoots from chimeras of Brassica juncea and Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell Rep 26:1727 –1732.
• Winkler, H . 1907 . Über propfbastarde und pflanzliche chimaeren. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 25: 568 –576.