Hydration kinetics o f ultrasound treated chickpeas( cider arietinum l.) during soaking

Bu çalışmada, yüksek enerjiye sahip ultrasonik ses dalgalarının suda bekletme sırasında nohutunsu emme kapasitesine etkisi incelenmiştir. Elde edilen deneysel sonuçlara, Asimptotik birinciderece modeli uygulanmış ve hidrasyon katsayıları (kH) hesaplanmıştır. Nohut numunelerine, 20,30, 40, 50, 60, 70 ve 80 oC sıcaklıklarında normal ıslatma işlemi uygulanmıştır. Nohutta ultrasonikses dalgalarının etkisinin belirlenmesi amacıyla belirtilen ıslatma işlemi 25 kHz 100 W ve 25 kHz300 Wlik 2 farklı ultrasonik ses dalgası uygulaması ile birlikte yapılmıştır. Sıcaklığın 20oCden80 o C artırılmasıyla, hidrasyon katsayısı (kH) 7.33x10-5 s -1 den 39.54x10-5 s -1ye arttığıbelirlenmiştir. 25 kHz 100 Wlık ultrasonik ses dalgası kullanıldığında, model için hidrasyonkatsayısı (kH) aynı sıcaklık aralığında 10.18x1 0-5 s -1 ve 43.71x10-5 s -1 olarak bulunmuştur. Yüksekgüçteki ultrasonik ses dalgalarının (25 kHz 300 W) kullanılmasının, bu etkiyi daha çok arttırdığı(kH değerleri, 12.33x10-5 - 47.80x10-5 s -1) gözlenmiştir. Yapılan çalışmada jelatinizasyon sıcaklığı60.8 0 oC olarak bulunmuştur. Aktivasyon enerji değerleri 60 o Cnin altında ve üzerinde sırasıyla32.01 ve 5.89 kJ/mol olarak bulunmuştur. Hidrasyon katsayılarının artması, su absorpsiyon hızınınartmasını, böylelikle nohutun daha kısa sürede yumuşamasını ve pişmesini sağlamaktadır.

Ultrason uygulanmış nohutların ( c ider arietinum l.) hidrasyon kinetiği

In this study, effect of ultrasounds with high energy on water absorption capacity of chickpea wasexamined during soaking process. Asimptotik first order model was applied to experimentalresults and water hydration rate constant (kH) was calculated. Normal soaking process was appliedto chickpea samples at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80 o C temperatures. In order to determining theeffects of ultrasound in chickpea, soaking process was made with two different ultrasounds such as25 kHz 100 W and 25 kHz 300 W. Increase in temperature from 20 to 80 oC increased thepredicted water hydration rate constant (kH) from 7.33x10-5 s -1 to 39.54x10-5 s -1. When 25 kHz 100 W ultrasound applied, water hydration constan (kH) for the same temperature range were found as 10.18x10-5 s -1 - 43.71x10-5 s -1 . Application of high power ultrasound such as 25 kHz 300 W at the same temperature interval was much more affected the water hydration rate constants (kH values 12.33x10-5 - 47.80x10-5 s -1). Gelatinization temperature of chickpea for this study was found as60.80 oC. Activation energy values using hydration rate constant below and above 60 oC wasfound 32.01 and 5.89 kJ/mol, respectively. Increase in hydration rate constant increase the waterabsorption rate which provides chickpea to soften and cookin a shorter time.

___

  • Abu-Ghannam, N. and Mckenna, B. 1997. Hydration kinetics of red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Food Science, 62, 520- 523.
  • Abu-Ghannam, N. 1998. Modelling textural changes during the hydration process of legumes. Journal of Food Engineering, 38, 341 – 352.
  • AOAC. 2002. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 17th Ed., Revision I, Gaithersburg, M. D, USA.
  • Bakshi, A.S. and Singh, R.P. 1980. Kinetics of water diffusion and starch gelatinization during rice parboiling. Journal of Food Science, 45, 1387 –1392.
  • Carcel, J., Benedito, J., Rossello, C. and Mulet, A. 2007b. Influence of ultrasound intensity on mass transfer in apple immersed in a sucrose solution. Journal of Food Engineering, 78, 472–479.
  • Carcel, J.A., Benedito, J., Bon, J. and Mulet, A. 2007a. High intensity ultrasound on meat brining. Meat Science , 76, 611 –619.
  • Chavan, J.K., Kadam, S.S. and Salunkhe, D.K. 1986. Biochemistry and technology of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 25, 107 –132.
  • Chavan, J.K., Kadam, S.S., and Salunkhe, D.K. 1989. CRC handbook of world food legumes . Volume 1, pp: 247 - 288. Davis, E. & Gordon, J. 1982. Food microstructure, an intcgrativc approach. Food Microstructure, 1, l-12.
  • Deshpande, S.D. and Bal, S. 2001. Effect of soakıng tıme and temperature on textural propertıes of soybean. Journal of Texture Studies , 32, 343 -347.
  • Ekpenyong, T.E. and Borchers , R.L. 1980. Effect of cooking on the chemical composition of winged beans (Psophocarpus tetragonolohus). Journal of Food Science, 45, 1559-1565.
  • Fasina, O.O., Irudhayaraj, J. and Sokhansanj, S. 1993. Three Dimensional Finite Elements analysis of Moisture Absorption in Expanding Alfalfa Cubes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 56, 337 -352.
  • Fernandez, M.L. and Berry, J.W. 1989. The effect of germination on chickpea starch. Starch, 41, 17 -21. Fuente, D.L.S., Riera, E. and Gallego, J.A. 2004. Effect of Power Ultrasound on Mass Transfer in Food Processing. Iowa Journal of Communication, We2.A.4, 1853 -1854.
  • Gallego- Juarez, J.A. 1998. Some applications of air- borne power ultrasound to food processing, in Povey, M.J.W. and Mason, T.J. (eds). Ultrasound in Food Processing Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
  • Gallego- Juarez, J.A., Rodriguez - Corral, G., Galvez - Moraleda, J. C. and Yang, T. S. 1999. A new high intensity ultrasonic technology for food dehydration. Drying Technology, 17, 597 -608.
  • Gowen, A., Abu-Ghannam, N., Frias, J. and Oliveira J. 2006. Optimisation of dehydration and rehydration properties of cooked chickpeas undergoing microwave –hot air combination drying. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 17 , 177 –183.
  • Gowen, A., Abu-Ghannam, N., Frias, J. and Oliveira, J. 2007. Modelling the water absorption process in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). The effect of blanching pre - treatment on water intake and texture kinetics. Journal of Food Engineering, 78, 810-819.
  • Ha ladjian, N., Fayad, R., Toufeili, I., Shadarevian, S., Sidahmed, M. and Baydoun, E. 2003. pH, temperature and hydration kinetics of faba beans. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 27, 9–20.
  • Han, I.H. and Baik, B. -K. 2006. Oligosaccharide Content and Composition of Legumes and Their Reduction by Soaking, Cooking, Ultrasound, and High Hydrostatic Pressure. Cereal Chemistry, 83, 428 -433.
  • Hsu, K.H., Kim, C.J. and Wilson, L.A.1983. Factors affecting water uptake of soybeans during soaking. Cereal Chemistry, 60, 208 –211.
  • Hung, T.V., Liu, K.H., Black, R.G. and Trewhella, M.A. 1993. Water absorption in chickpea and field pea (P. sativum) cultivars using the Peleg model. Journal of Food Science , 58, 848 –852.
  • Ibarz A., Gonzalez, C. and Barbosa -Canova s, G.V. 2004. Kinetic models for water adsorption and cooking time in chickpea soaked and treated by high pressure. Journal of Food Engineering, 63, 467 – 472.
  • Jayasooriya S.D., Bhandari B.R., Torley P. And D’Arcy B.R. 2004. Effect of high power ultrasound waves on properties of meat: a review. Intarnational Journal of Food Properties, 7, 301 -319.
  • Kashaninejad, M., Maghsoudlou, Y., Rafiee, S. and Khomeiri, M. 2007. Study of hydration kinetics and density changes of rice (Tarom Mahali) during hydrothermal processing, Journal of Food Engineering, 79, 1383 –1390.
  • Kon, S., Brown, A.H., Ohanueson, J.G. and Booth, A.N. 1973. Split peeled beans preparation and some proper ties. Journal of Food Science , 38, 496.
  • Kubota, K. 1979. Study of the rate equation for the soaking and cooking of red bean. Journal of Faculty of Applied and Biological Sciences , 18, 161 – 169.
  • King, R.D. and Ashton, S.J. 1985. Effect of seed coat thickness and blanching on the water absorption by soybeans . International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 20, 505 -509.
  • Lin, S.H. 1993. Water uptake and gelatinization of white rice. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie , 31, 659– 665.
  • Maskan, M. 2002. Effect of processing on hydration kinetics of three wheat products of the same variety. Journal of Food Engineering, 52, 337 –341.
  • Muggeo, V.M. 2003. Estimating regression models with unknown breakpoints. Statistics in Medicine , 22, 3055 –3071.
  • Mulet, A., Carcel, J.A., Sanjuan, N. and Bon, J. 2003. New food drying Technologies - use of ultrasound. Food Science and Technology International, 9, 215 -221.
  • Pinto, G., Esin, A., 2004. Kinetics of the osmotic hydration of chickpeas. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 532–536.
  • Patane, C., Iacoponi, E. and Raccuia, S.A. 2004. Physico-chemical characteristics, water absorption, soaking and cooking properties of some Sicilian populations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 55, 547 -/554.
  • Quast, D.G. and Silva, S.D. 1977. Temperature dependence of hydration rate and effect of hydration on the cooking rate of dry legumes. Journal of Food Science , 42, 1299-1303.
  • Riera, E., Golas, Y., Blanco, A., Gallego, J.A., Blasco, M. and Mulet, A. 2004. Mass transfer enhancement in supercritical fluids extraction by means of power ultrasound. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 11, 241 –244.
  • Romdhane, M. and Gourdon, C. 2002. Investigations in solid-liquid extraction: influence of ultrasound. Chemical Engineering Journal, 87, 11 -19.
  • Rockland, L.B. and Metzler, E.A. 1967. Quick- cooking lima and other dry beans. Food Tec hnology, 21, 344–348 .
  • Sabapathy, N. D., Tabil, L.G. and Baik, O.D. 2005. Moisture Absorption in Kabuli Type Chickpea During Soaking and Cooking. ASAE Annual International Meeting, Center Tampa, Florida. Paper Number: 056160.
  • Sağol, S., Turhan, M. and Sayar , S. 2006. A potential method for determining in situ cooking temperature of starch using initial water transfer rate in whole cereals. Journal of Food Engineering, 76, 427 – 432.
  • Sanchez, E.S., Simal, S., Femenia, A., Benedito, J. and Rossello , C. 1999. Influence of ultrasound on mass transport during cheese brining. European Food Research and Technology, 209, 215 –219.
  • Sayar, S., Turhan, M. and Gunasekaran, S. 2001. Analysis of chickpea soaking by simultaneous water transfer and water – starch reaction. Jour nal of Food Engineering, 50, 91 –98.
  • Shehata, N.A., Darwish, N., Nahr, F.E., and Razek, F.A.A. 1988. Supplementation of wheat flour with some local legumes. Die Nahrung, 31, 3 -8.
  • Simal, S., Benedito, J., Sanchez, E.S. and Rossello, C. 1998. Influence of ultrasound to increase mass transport rates during osmotic dehydration. Journal of Food Engineering, 36, 323 –336.
  • Simpson, H.C., Lousley, R.S., Greekie, M., Hockaday, T.D.R., Carter, R.D., and Mann, J.I. 1981. A high carbohydrate leguminous fibre diet improve s all aspects of diabetes control. Lancet, 1, 1 –4.
  • Singh, B.P.N. and Kulshrestha, S.P. 1987. Kinetics of water sorption by soybean and pigeon pea grains. Journal of Food Science, 52, 1538 –1541, 1544.
  • Smith, A.K. and K ash, A.M. 1961. Water absorption of soybeans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 38, 120- 123. Tharanathan, R.N., and Mahadevamma, S. 2003. Grain legumes – A boon to human nutrition. Trends in Food and Science Technology, 14, 507 –518.
  • Turhan, M., Sayar, S. and Gunasekaran, S. 2002. Application of Peleg model to study water absorption in chickpea during soaking. Journal of Food Engineering, 53, 153 -159.
  • Wambura, P., Yang, W. and Wang, Y. 2008. Power ultrasound enhanced one -step soaking and gelatinization for rough rice parboiling. International Journal of Food Engineering, 4, 1 – 12.
  • Wood, J.A. and Harden, S. 2006. A Method to Estimate the Hydration and Swelling Properties of Chickpeas ( Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Science , 71, 190- 195.
  • Zheng, L. and Sun, D.W. 2006. Innovative a pplications of power ultrasound during food freezing processes -a review. Food Science and Technology, 17, 16- 23.
  • Zbigniew J. Dolatowski, Joanna Stadnik, Dariusz Stasiak. 2007. Agricultural University of Lublin. Applications of ultrasound in food technology. ACTA Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria, 6, 89- 99.