___

• Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri. Ankara: Kök. Alvermann, D., Swafford, J., & Montero, M.K. (2004). Content area literacy instruction for the elementary grades.
• Boston: Pearson Education.
• Anderson, R.C., & Kulhavy, R.W. (1972). Imagery and prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 242- 243.
• Baldwin, M.P.H. (2013). An experimental investigation of the effects of an imagery strategy on vocabulary learning and retention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai, Manoa.
• Block, C. C. (1993). Strategy instruction in a student-centered classroom. Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 137-153.
• Block, C. C., & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Research on teaching comprehension. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford.
• Block, C.C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
• Bouchard, M. (2005). Comprehension strategies for English language learners: 30 research-based reading strategies that help students read, understand, and really learn content from their text books and other nonfiction materials.
• New York, NY: Scholastic Teaching Resources.
• Bourduin, B. J.,Bourduin C. M., & Manley, C. M. (1993). The use of imagery training to improve reading comprehension of second graders. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155(1), 115-118.
• Brooker, H.G. (2013).The effects of visual imagery and keyword cues on third-grade readers' memory, comprehension, and vocabulary knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA.
• Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37 Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Neward, DE: International Reading Association.
• Calfee, R.C., & Patrick, C.L. (1995). Teach our children well: Bringing K-12 education into the 21st century. Stanford, CA: Stanford Alumni.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
• Cohen, M. T. (2012). Strengthening scie nce vocabulary through the use of imagery interventions with college students. Creative Education, 3(7), 1251-1258.
• Cohen, M. T., & Johnson, H. L. (2012). Improving the acquisition and retention of science material by fifth grade students through the use of imagery interventions. Instructional Science, 40(6), 925-955. Cohen, M. T., & Johnson, H. L. (2011). Improving the acquisition of novel vocabulary through the use of imagery interventions. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 357-366.
• Cramer, E. H. (1980). Mental imagery, reading attitude and comprehension. Reading Improvement, 17(2), 135-139.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Duffy, G. (2009). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Guilford.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
• Finch, C. M. (1982, December). Fifth-grade below average and above average readers' use of mental imagery in reading familiar and unfamiliar text. Paper presented at the 32nd National Reading Conference, Clearwater Beach, FL.
• Fisher, R. W. (2007). The effect of guided mental imagery on the intrinsic reading motivation of fourth and fifth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Widener University, Pennsylvania.
• Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
• Fredericks, A. D. (2010). The teacher's handbook: Strategies for success. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
• Gambrell, L. B., Koskinen, P. S., & Cole, J. N. (1980). The effects of induced mental imagery upon comprehension: A comparison of written versus oral presentation. Paper presented at the 30thAnnual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED198503).
• Gambrell, L.B. (1982). Induced mental imagery and the text prediction performance of first and third graders. In J.A.
• Niles & L.A. Harris (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 131-135). Thirty-first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
• Gambrell, L.B., & Bales, R.J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth- and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 454-464.
• Gambrell, L.B., & Jawitz, P.B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children's story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 264-276.
• García, G.E., & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Modifying reading instruction to maximize its effectiveness for all students. In M.S. Knapp & P.M. Shields (Eds.), Better schooling for the children of poverty: Alternatives to conventional wisdom (pp.31-59). Berkeley CA: McCutchan.
• Gaskins, I.W. (2003). Taking charge of reader, text, activity, and content variables. In A.P. Sweet & C.E. Snow (Ed.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 141-165). New York: Guilford. Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2005), Using spss for windows and macintosh: Analysing and understanding data (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Gunning, T. (2004). Creating literacy for all students in grades 4 to 8. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Gunston-Parks, C. A. (1985). Effects of imagery ability and text bound guided imagery on comprehension by low readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, USA. Hibbing, A. N., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 758-771.
• Hodes, C. L. (1990). The induction use, and effectiveness of mental imagery as an instructional variable. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
• Iglesia, J., Buceta, M., & Campos, A. (2005). Prose learning in children and adults with Downsyndrome: The use of visual and mental image strategies to improve recall. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 30 (4), 199-206.
• Irwin, J. W. (1979). College readers' mental imagery, reading ability and attitude toward reading. Reading Improvement. 16(21), 124-129.
• Jenkins, M. H. (2009). The effects of using mental imagery as a comprehension strategy for middle school students reading science expository texts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, USA.
• Karasu, H. P., Girgin, Ü. ve Uzuner, Y. (2013). Formel olmayan okuma envanteri. Ankara: Nobel.
• Keene, E.O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Kocaarslan, M (2014, Mayıs). İlköğretim öğrencileri (1-6.sınıflar) için okumaya yönelik tutum ölçeği'nin Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. 13. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Sempozyumu'nda sunulan bildiri, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Kütahya,. Long, S. A., Winograd, P. N., & Bridge, C. A. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on imagery reported during and after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 353-372.
• Lowenthal, B. (1986). The power of suggestion. Academic Therapy, 21 (5), 537-541 Macceca, S. (2007). Reading strategies for social studies. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education.
• Macomber, C. (2001).The use of mental imagery and its relation to reading attitudes among fourth grade students.
• Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University School of Education, New York.
• Mathewson, G.C. (2004). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R.B. Ruddell., & N.J.
• Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1431-1460). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher. 43 (9), 626-629.
• Miller, D. (2002). Reading with meaning: Teaching Comprehension in the primary grades. Portland, ME. Stenhause.
• Moreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact.
• Chicago: ALA.
• Mountain, L. (1986). Releasing the remedial reader's creative power. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(1), 5-7.
• Mowey, S., & Conahan, P. (1995). Reading-writing comprehension strategies. Instructional Support System of Pennsylvannia, East Petersburg.
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD] (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH Publication, Washington, DC: U. S.
• Government Printing Office. [Available online at: Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm.], Retrieved on January 29, 2015. Neufeld, P.(2006). Comprehension instruction in content area classes. The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 302-312.
• Oakhill, J., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems?. Journal of Research in Reading, 14(2), 106-115.
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University. Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete images and verbal memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 279-285.
• Pearson, P. D. (2009). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israel and G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp.3-31). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. Elementary School Journal, 88, 151-165. Perry, C., & Morris, T. (1995). Mental imagery in sport. In T. Morris, and J. Summers (Eds.), Sport psychology:
• Theory, applications, and issues (pp. 339-385). Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley and Sons.
• Peters, E. E., & Levin J. R. (1986). Effects of a mnemonic imagery strategy on good and poor readers' prose recall.
• Reading Research Quarterly, 21(2), 179-192.
• Pressley, G.M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355-359.
• Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
• Reading Study Group [RAND] (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Washington, DC: RAND Corporation.
• Rebbeck, B. (1989). This could be the start of something poetic. Gifted Child Today, 12(6), 26-28.
• Reutzels, D. R. & R. B. Cooter, Jr. 2004. Teaching children to read: Putting the pieces together (4th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Rose, D. S., Parks, M., Androes, K., & McMahon, S. D. (2000). Imagery-based learning: Improving elementary students' reading comprehension with drama techniques. Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 55-64.
• Rowher, W. D., Jr. (1973). Elaboration and learning in childhood and adolescence. In W. H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in childhood development and behavior (pp. 1-57). New York: Academic.
• Sadoski, M. (1984). Text structure, imagery, and affect in the recall of a story by children. In J. A. Niles and L. A.
• Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives in research in reading/ language processing and instruction. Thirty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 48-53). Washington, D. C.: National Reading Conference.
• Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221-238.
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A Dual Coding Theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, and H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp.582-601).
• Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Sadoski, M., & Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 256-272.
• Sweet, A. P., & Snow, C. (2002). Reconceptualizing Reading Comprehension. In C.C. Block, L. B. Gambrell & M.
• Pressley (Eds.) Improving Comprehension Instruction: Rethinking Research (pp. 54-79) Newark, DE, International Reading Association.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Tierney, R., & Readence, J. (2000). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium. Boston: Allynand Bacon.
• Vacca, R.T., Vacca, J.L., & Mraz, M. (2011). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M.
• Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den B roek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1-31). New York: Teachers College.
• Walker, B. J., Truscott, D. M., Gambrell, L. B., & Almasi, J. (1994).Mental imagery, text illustrations, and reading comprehension of adult readers. In E. G. Sturtevant, W. M. Linek, K. A. J. Mohr, E. W., & E. W. Murphy (Eds.), Pathways for literacy: Learners teach and teachers learn: The sixteenth yearbook of the College Reading Association (pp. 99-108). Pittsburg, KS: College Reading Association.
• Wheatley, G. (1991). Enhancing mathematics learning through imagery. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39 (1), 34-36.
• Wilson, D. L.(2012). Training the mind's eye: 'Brain movies' support comprehension and recall. The Reading Teacher, 66, 189-194.
• Yurdugül, H. (2005, Eylül). Ölçek geliştirme çalişmalarinda kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanilmasi. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi'nde sunulan bildiri, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.