Matematik Derslerindeki Sınıf-içi Eşitsizlik Durumlarının Yapılabilirlik Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi

Bu araştırmanın amacı sınıf-içi adalet kavramını yapılabilirlik yaklaşımı kapsamında incelemektir. Araştırmada Türkiye'deki sınıflarda bulunan eşitsizlik durumları vaka çalışması yardımıyla ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Veriler altı ortaokul matematik öğretmeniyle yapılan bireysel görüşmeler ve bir akademik dönem boyunca gerçekleştirilen sınıf-içi gözlemler aracılığıyla elde edilmiştir. Araştırmada öğretmen-öğrenci, öğrenci-öğrenci etkileşimlerine öğretmenlerin eşitsizlik durumlarıyla başa çıkma stratejilerine ve öğrenme-öğretme süreçlerini etkileyen faktörlere (öğretim, öğretmen davranışları, beceriler, güç ilişkileri gibi) odaklanılmıştır. Ayrıca, öğrencilerinin sınıf-içi katılımlarını sınırlandıran, başarılarını ve öğrenmelerini olumsuz etkileyen şartlar incelenmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin analizi sonucunda, sınıf-içi eşitsizlik durumlarını ortaya koyan dört önemli tema ortaya çıkmıştır: (i) öğrenme materyallerine erişim; (ii) öğretmene erişim; (iii) demokratik sınıf iklimi ve (iv) öğrencilerin farklı ihtiyaçlarını göz önünde bulunduran pedagojilerdir.

Exploring Classroom Inequalities in a Mathematics Class through a Capabilities-Based Social Justice Framework

This paper aims to examine classroom justice through a capabilities-focused praxis. The research employs a case study design to explore inequalities in a classroom environment in Turkey. Data are drawn from in-depth individual interviews with six teachers working at the secondary level of primary school and from their classroom observations for one academic term. We monitored teacher-student and student-student interactions, and strategies for coping with inequalities and conversion factors (such as training, teacher behaviour, skills, power relations) that affect teaching and learning processes. We then looked into the conditions that limit student capability to participate in class, do well on exams and benefit from learning. The study lists the conditions of inequality and maps out a new capabilities direction to examine classroom inequalities in Turkey. These capabilities can be listed as: capability to access (appropriate) learning materials; capability to access the teacher; capability to have a democratic classroom environment; and capability to access appropriate teaching and pedagogy for different learning styles and needs.

___

  • Aikman, S., & Unterhalter. E. (2005). Beyond access: Transforming policy and practice for gender equality in education. Bournemouth: Oxfam.
  • Aikman, S., Halai, A., & Rubagiza, J. (2011). Conceptualising gender equality in research on education quality. Comparative Education, 47(1), 45-60.
  • Akhun, I., Bircan, I., Bülbül, S., & Senemoğlu, N. (2000) Kız çocuklarının mesleki eğitime ve istihdama yönelimleri. Ankara: KSSGM.
  • Alat, Z., & Alat, K. (2011) .A Qualitative study of parental resistance to girls' schooling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11, 1369-1373.
  • Bakis, O., Levent, H., Insel, A., & Polat, S. (2009). Türkiye'de eğitime erişimin belirleyicileri, İstanbul:
  • ERG, Sabanci University.
  • Banks, C. A. M., & Banks, J. A. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory into Practice, 34, 152-158.
  • Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1993). Research in education, Boston: Allyn & Bacon Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Thematic analysis and code development: Transforming qualitative information.
  • London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Burton, L. (Ed.) (2003). Which way social justice in mathematics education: International perspectives on mathematics education. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  • Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004a). Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly, 52, 98-114.
  • Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004b). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53, 253-273.
  • Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., & Turner, L. A. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Cin, F. M. (2014). A capabilities-based approach to gender justice: Changes and continuities across three generations of women teachers' lives in Turkey. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Nottingham.
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity, and social justice in teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • DeJaeghere, J., & Lee, S. K. (2011). What matters for marginalized girls and boys in Bangladesh: a capabilities approach for understanding educational well-being and empowerment Research in Comparative and International Education, 6, 27-41.
  • DeJaeghere, J., & Miske, S. (2009). Constructing and negotiating gender relation, ethnic tradition, and poverty: secondary school-age Hmong girls in Vietnam. In Wiggan, G. & Hutchison, C. (eds.) Global ıssues in education: Pedagogy, policy, practice and the minority experience (pp. 219-238). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Engin-Demir, C., & Çobanoğlu, R. (2012). Kızların okullaşmasının önündeki engeller ve çözüm önerileri: alan araştırması. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
  • Fennel, S., & Arnot M. (2008) Gender education and equality in a global context: Conceptual frameworks and policy perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness, New York: Continuum.
  • Garii, B., & Rule, A. C. (2009). Integrating social justice with mathematics and science: An analysis of student teacher lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 490-499 Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Gay, LR, Mills, G., & Airasian, PW (2008). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hal Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Towards a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 145-187.
  • Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers.
  • Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, Ltd.
  • Heid, M. K. (2010). Where's the math (in mathematics education research)? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 102-103.
  • Herzig, A. H., & Knott, L. (2005). Goals for achieving diversity in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teacher, 99(4), 253-259.
  • Horan, S. M., & Myers, S. A. (2009). An exploration of college instructors' use of classroom justice, power, and behavior alteration techniques. Communication Education, 58, 483-496.
  • Frost, J. (2008). Combining approaches to qualitative data analysis: Synthesising the mechanical (CAQDAS) with the thematic (a voice-centred relational approach). Methodological Innovations Online, 3(1), 25- 37.
  • Kaya, N. (2009) Forgotten or assimilated? Minorities in the education system of Turkey. Available online at: www.minorityrights.org/download.php?id=632 (Accessed May 25th, 2013).
  • Kirdar, M. (2009) Explaining ethnic disparities in school enrolment in Turkey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57, 297-333.
  • Leonard, J., & Moore, C. (2014). Learning to enact social justice pedagogy in mathematics classrooms, Action in Teacher Education, 36(1), 76-95.
  • Majumdar, M., & Mooij, J. E. (2011). Education and inequality in India: A classroom view. Routledge. Martin, D. B., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12-24.
  • McMillan, J. S., & Schumacher, J. S. (2006). Research in education: A conceptual introduction.
  • Massachusetts. Allyn & Bacon.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2005). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Paulsel, M. L., & Chory-Assad, R. M. (2005). Perceptions of instructor interactional justice as a predictor of student resistance. Communication Research Reports, 22, 283-291.
  • Presmeg, N. (2007). The role of culture in teaching and learning mathematics. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 435-458). Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Raynor, J. (2008). Schooling girls: An inter-generational study of women's burdens in rural Bangladesh. In Fenne, S., & Arnot, M. (eds.) Gender Education and Equality in a Global Context: Conceptual frameworks and policy perspectives (pp. 117-130). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Sayilan, F. (2008). Gender and Education in Turkey. In Nohl, A., Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. & Wigley, S. (eds.) Education in Turkey (pp. 247-270). Munster: Waxmann.
  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. & Sen, A. (eds.) The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I (2009).
  • primary classroom pupils' and teachers' perspectives'. Bitish Educatioanl Research Jounal, 35(2), 187-204.
  • Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2009). Gender matters in the primary classroom pupils' and teachers' perspectives'. Bitish Educatioanl Research Jounal, 35(2), 187-204.
  • Stromquist, N. (2007). The gender socialization process in schools: a cross-national comparison. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Tan, M. (2000). Eğitimde kadın-erkek eşitliği ve Türkiye gerçeği. Tan, M., & Ecevit, Y. (eds.) Kadın-erkek eşitliğine doğru yürüyüş: Eğitim, çalışma yaşamı ve siyaset içinde (s. 21-116). İstanbul: TUSIAD.
  • Tikly, L. & Barrett, A. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 3-14.
  • Tikly, L., & Barett, A. (2013). Education Quality and Social Justice in the Global South: Challenges for policy, practice and research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • UNICEF & UNGEI (2008). Making education work: The Gender dimension of the school to work transitions. Bangkok: UNICEF and UNGEI.
  • Unterhalter, E. (2007). Gender, schooling and global social justice. Oxon: Routledge. Unterhalter, E. (2009). What is equity in education? Reflections from the capability approach. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28, 415-424.
  • Vaughan, R., & Walker, M. (2012). Capabilities, values and education policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13, 495-512.
  • Walker, M. (2006). Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making. Journal of Education Policy, 21, 163-185.
  • Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Amartya Sen's capability approach and social justice in education.
  • New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Warrington, M., & Kiragu, S. (2012). It makes more sense to educate a boy: girls 'against the odds' in Kajiado, Kenya, International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 301-309.
  • Weil, D. K., & Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Critical thinking and learning: An encyclopedia for parents and teachers. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
  • Yücel, C. & Karadağ, E. (2016). TIMSS 2015 Türkiye: Patinajdaki eğitim. Eskişehir: Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi.
  • Younger, M., & Cobbett, M. (2014). Gendered perceptions of schooling: Classroom dynamics and inequalities within four Caribbean secondary schools. Educational Review, 66, 1-21.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı