Yükseköğretimde Etik Liderlik ve İşyeri Zorbalığı

Bu çalışma yükseköğretimde etik liderlik ve işyeri zorbalığı arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmini kavramlarının aracılık rollerini araştırmaktır. Çalışma 2011-2012 bahar eğitimöğretim döneminde İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya ve Gaziantep illerinde bulunan ve rastlantısal olarak seçilen 9 vakıf üniversitesindeki 591 öğretim üyesi ve dekanlarını kapsamaktadır. Öğretim üyelerinin psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmin düzeyleri sırasıyla Kahn (1990) tarafından geliştirilmiş "psikolojik güvenlik ölçeği" ile Robinson ve Morrison (1995) tarafından geliştirilmiş "psikolojik sözleşme tatmin ölçeği" ile değerlendirilmiştir. Brown, Treviño, ve Harrison'un (2005) "etik liderlik ölçeği" ile Einarsen ve Hoel'in (2001) "gözden geçirilmiş işyeri zorbalığı ölçeği" öğretim üyelerinin bağlı bulundukları fakülte dekanlarının etik liderlik düzeyleri ve işyeri zorbalığı algılarını ölçmektedir. Sonuçlar etik liderlik ile işyeri zorbalığı arasında olumsuz ve önemli bir ilişki ve bu ilişkide psikolojik güvenlik ve psikolojik sözleşme tatmin kavramlarında aracılık rolleri bulunduğunu göstermiştir

Ethical Leadership and Workplace Bullying in Higher Education

This study examines the relationship between ethical leadership and workplace bullying and the mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship in higher education. The sample of this study is composed of 591 faculty members along with their deans from 9 private universities chosen by random method in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Kayseri, Konya and Gaziantep in 2011-2012 spring semester. Faculty members’ perceptions of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment were measured using the scale developed by Kahn (1990) and psychological contract fulfillment scale developed by Robinson and Morrison (1995). Brown, Treviño, and Harrison’s (2005) ethical leadership scale and Einarsen and Hoel’s (2001) the Negative Act Questionnaire-Revised scale were used to assess faculty member’s perception of the ethical leadership and workplace bullying respectively. The results revealed a significant negative relationship between ethical leadership and bullying and mediating roles of psychological safety and psychological contract fulfillment on that relationship

___

  • Apaydın, C. (2012). Relationship between workplace bullying and organizational cynicism in Turkish public universities. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 9649-9657.
  • Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717-741.
  • Aquino, K., Tripp, T., & Bies, R. (2001). How employees respond to interpersonal offense: The effects of blame attribution, offender status, and victim status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52-59.
  • Aydın, O., & Öcel, H. (2009). The Negative Acts Questionnaire: A study for validity and reliability. Turkish Psychological Articles, 12(24), 94-106.
  • Baillien, E., Neyens, I., De Witte, H., & De Cuyper, N. (2009). Towards a Three Way Model of Workplace Bullying: a Qualitative Study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1-16.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182.
  • Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  • Brown, M., Treviño, L., & Harrison, D. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
  • Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 81–98.
  • Cemaloğlu, N. (2007). Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stilleri ile yıldırma arasındaki ilişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 33, 77-87.
  • Chiu, S., & Peng, J. (2008). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employee deviance: The moderating role of hostile attributional style. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 426–433.
  • Dutton, J. (2003). Energize Your Workplace: How to Build and Sustain High-Quality Relationships at Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Dutton, J., & Heaphy, E. (2003). The power of high-quality relationships at work. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 263–278). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
  • Edmondson, A. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128-146.
  • Edmondson, A. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In R. Kramer, & K. Cook (Eds.), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (pp. 239–272). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Einarsen, S., & Hoel, H. (2001). The negative acts questionnaire: development, validation, and revision of a measure of bullying at work. Paper presented at the 10Th Annual Congress of Work and Occupational Psychology, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire – Revised. Work & Stress, 23, 24- 44.
  • Glaso, L., Nielsen, M., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Interpersonal problems among perpetrators and targets of workplace bullying. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1316-1333.
  • Hoel, H., Glaso, L., Hetland, J., Cooper, C., & Einarsen, S. (2010). Leadership Styles as Predictors of Self-reported and Observed Workplace Bullying. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 453–468.
  • James, L., & James, L. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 739–751.
  • James, L., & Sells, S. (1981). Psychological climate: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research. In D. Magnussen (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the Development of Moral Thought and Action. Winston, New York: Holt, Rinehart.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
  • Lawrence, T., & Robinson, S. (2007). Ain’t misbehaving: workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management, 33(3), 378-394.
  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165-184.
  • Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership development. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241−261). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
  • MacKinnon, D. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson, & S. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 141-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • May, D., Gilson, R., & Harter, L. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
  • Mayer, D., Kuenzi, M., & Greenbaum, R. (2011). Examining the Link between Ethical Leadership and Employee Misconduct: The Mediating Role of Ethical Climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 7-16.
  • Mayer, D., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1-13.
  • Mullane, S. (2009). Ethics and Leadership. The Johnson A. Edosomwan Leadership Institute University of Miami White Paper Series, 1, 1-6.
  • Plinio, A. (2009). Ethics and Leadership. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 6(4), 277-283.
  • Quinn, R., & Quinn, G. (2002). Letters to Garrett: Stories of Change, Power and Possibility. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  • Robinson, S. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.
  • Robinson, S., Kraatz, M., & Rousseau, D. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 137-152.
  • Robinson, S., & Morrison, E. (1995). Developing a standardized measure of the psychological contract. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Vancouver.
  • Robinson, S., & Rousseau, D. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245–259.
  • Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations. Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schminke, M., Ambrose, A., & Miles, J. (2003). The impact of gender and setting on perceptions of others’ ethics. Sex Roles, 48, 361–375.
  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., & Franke, G. (1999). Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19-36.
  • Stouten, J., Baillien, E., Van den Broeck, A., Camps, J., De Witte, H., & Euwema, M. (2010). Discouraging Bullying: The Role of Ethical Leadership and its Effects on the Work Environment. Journal of Business Ethics. 95, 17-27.
  • The Council of Higher Education. (2012). Private universities. [Available online at: http://www.yok.gov.tr/en/content/view/762/lang,tr/], Retrieved on November 12, 2012
  • Treviño, L., Brown, M., & Pincus-Hartman, L. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.
  • Turnley, W., Bolino, M., Lester, S., & Bloodgood, J. (2003). The Impact of Psychological Contract Fulfillment on the Performance of In-Role and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 187-206.
  • Walumbwa, F., Mayer, D., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204-213.
  • Wouters, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2011). Leadership perceptions and integrity: An empirical study. Paper presented at the EGPA Annual Conference 2011, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Yılmaz, E. (2006). Okullardaki Örgütsel Güven Düzeyinin Okul Yöneticilerinin Etik Liderlik Özellikleri ve Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S., Glibkowski, B., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647-680.
  • Zohar, D. (2002). The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 75–92.