___

• Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., Yıldırım, E. (2005). Social science research method. Sakarya: Sakarya publication.
• Aydın, M. (1994). Contemporary education supervision. Ankara: Pegem.
• Aydın, M.(1996). Education sociology lesson notes. Malatya.
• Aydın , İ . ( 2005). Teaching supervision: Status detection, evaluation and development. Ankara: Pegem.
• Aypay , A . ( 2010 ) Problems related to the supervision profile. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 8 (3), 593- 622.
• Balcı, A. (2002). Developing effective school. Ankara: Pegem.
• Behlol, M.G., Yousuf, K.I., Parveen, Q., Kayani, M.M. (2011). Concept of supervision and supervisory practices at primary level in pakistan. International Education Studies, 4 (4), 28-35.
• Beycioğlu, K., Dönmez, B. (2009) Rethinking educational supervision. Inonu University Journal of Education, 10 (2) 71-93.
• Boydak Özan, M. ve Özdemir, T.Y. (2010). The psychological stress of supervision on teachers. 2 nd InternationalEducation Supervision Congress, 23-25 June, Kütahya.
• Bulach, C.,Boothe, D. & Michael,P. (1994) Supervisory behaviors that affect school climate. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Asociation, April 19 -23, Montreal, Canada.
• Burgaz , B. (1995). Some supervision roles which are not carried out sufficiently in the supervision of Primary Education Institutions and the reasons. The Journalof Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 11, 127- 134.
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1991). New Structure and behavior in school management. Ankara: Pegem.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. , Çakmak, . K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz , Ş., Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem.
• Çelik, V. (2002). Fundamental inclinations which lead policy of training education administrator. Symposium of 21st Century Education Administrator Training, 16-21 Mayıs 2002, Ankara.
• Demircioğlu, İ. H. (2006). A qualitative study on the learning styles of history teachers candidates. Educational Studies, 6, 23.
• Doğanay, E. (2006). Comparison of the supervision services carried out at primary schools and secondary schools in rural areas, Unpublished postgraduate thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van.
• Ergen , N. (1977). Lesson supervision at the secondary schools which are under the supervision of Ministry of National Education. Lesson Work? Ankara.
• Fehr, S. J. K. (2001). The role of the education supervisor in United States public schools from 1970 to 2000 as reflected in the supervision literature, the degree of doctor philosophy. Pennsylvania State University, USA.
• Gök, T. (2009).Views of the supervisors and principals about the problems in terms of the organizational supervision of the primary schools. Unpublished postgraduate thesis, (the example of Muğla city) Muğla University, Muğla.
• Gökalp, S . (2009). Perception analysis of primary school teachers in terms of the fulfillment degree of primary Education Supervisions’ supervision task in the teacher supervision process. Unpublished Master’s Thesis , University of Mersin, Mersin.
• Gözübüyük, Ş.(1996). Management law. Ankara: 9. Edition, Turhan Publishing.
• Güleryüz, H. (2009). Primary school supervisors’ workload and their main problems in the process of restructuralism / constructivism. 1st International National Education Supervision Congress. 26-28 June, Ankara.
• Hills, J. (1991). Issues in research instructional supervision: Contrubution to the discussion. Journal of Curriculum and Supenision, 7 (1), 1-12.
• İlgan, A. (2008). Primary school teachers and supervisions’ adoption and application level of the differentiated supervision model, educational administration. Theory and Practice, 55, 389 – 422 .
• Jaffer, K. (2010). School inspection and supervision in Pakistan: Approaches and issues, Prospects, 40, 375–392.
• Kayıkçı, K. (2005). Perceptions of supervisors from the Ministry of National Education about structural issues in the supervision system and job satisfaction level. The Journal of Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 44, 507-527.
• Kocabaş, İ., Demir, A. H. (2009). Primary school supervisors’ perceptions related to supervision. 1 st InternationalNational Education Supervision Congress.26-28 June, Ankara
• MoNE ( Ministry Of Education. (2001). Departments of primary education supervisionate guidance and inspection instruction. Communications Journal, No : 2521 .
• Oğuz , E., Yılmaz , K., Taştan, M. (2007). Supervision beliefs of primary education supervisions and primary education principals, Journal of Social Sciences, 17, 40-51.
• Olgun, R. (2005). Views of the primary school principals and assistant principals about the supervision activities carried out by school supervisors. Unpublished postgraduate thesis, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale.
• Öztürk, Ş. (2009). Supervisors’ and shool principals’ views about the problems regarding organizational supervision of primary schools, (the example of Kütahya city) Unpublished postgraduate thesis, Muğla Universiy, Muğla.
• Öztürk, Ş., Taner, T. (2010). Primary education principal’s problems in institution supervision. Internal conferance on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11 – 13 November, 2010 Antalya – Turkey.
• Renklier, A. (2005). Effectiveness level of the primary school supervisors in terms of learning-teacher process and management tasks at primary schools. Unpublished postgraduate thesis, Erciyes University, Kayseri.
• Samancı,O., Taşçıoğlu, N. ve Çetin, İ. (2009). Primary school teachers’ expectations from supervisors. 1st International National Education Supervision Congress, 26-28 June, Ankara.
• Sarıçam, İ., Selvi, H.H. ve Göksu, M.Z. (2010). Expectations of school inspectors of elementary school principals. 2st International National Education Supervision Congress.26-23-25 June, Kütahya.
• Sergiovanni, T.J., R.J. Starratt. (1993). Supervision: A redefinition. New York: McGraw- Hill.
• Sarpkaya, R. (2004) Problems the primary education supervisors face during supervision process, The Journal of Faculty of Education,Süleyman Demirel University, Burdur, 5 (8), 114-129.
• Sindu, G.K., Fook, C.Y. (2010). Formative supervision of teaching and learning: Issues and concerns for the school head. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39 (4), 589-605.
• Taymaz, H. (1982) Supervision (Concepts,Principles,Methods). A.U.Publications of Faculty of Educational Sciences, No:113, Ankara.
• Toker, A. G. (2009) Supervision for scientific management approach. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (18), 74-89.
• Topçu, İ . (2010). The Principals’ completion form of the task of education supervision at the state and private elementary schools. C. U . Journal of Social Sciences, 34 (2), 31-39.
• Uludüz, S. (1996). Primary education institutions under the supervision of inspectors classroom behavior. Unpublished master's thesis, Hacettepe Üniversity Ankara.
• Ünal , A. (2006 ). The evaluation of the Primary Education Supervisions in terms of learning organization approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Konya Selçuk University , Konya.
• Unal , A., Erol , S . Y. (2011). The expections of primary school principals from primary school supervisions. eJournal of New World Sciences Academy, 6 (4) 2631-2645.
• Yavuz, M. (2010). Effectiveness of supervisions conducted by primary education supervisors according to school principals’ evaluations. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 371–378.
• Yavuz , M. (2006). The roles expected from primary school principals and the realization levels. Selçuk University, School of Social Sciences Journal, 16, 657- 670 .
• Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2005). The qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Press.
• Yılmaz, K. (2009) Supervision task of school principals. The Journal of Faculty of Education, 10 (1), 19-35.
• Manzare, Z. (2011). Instructional supervision in public secondary schools in Kenya. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1-29.