Dil Öğrenenlerin Etkileşimli Çoklu Ortama Yönelik Algıları

Bu çalışmada, 2012 yılının ilkbaharında 113 katılımcının (N=113) bir dil öğrenme programına (World Talk English) yönelik algıları ve bu algılar ile cinsiyet, yaş-grubu, meslek ve yabancı dil öğrenme süresi arasında bir farklılık olup olmadığı araştırıldı. Çalışmada hem nicel hem de nitel yöntem kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları SPSS programı ile (Ortalama, Standart Sapma, Bağımsız Örnekleme t Testi, Yüzde, Varyans Analizi, Ki-kare) analiz edildi. Katılımcılar, programı İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğrenme konusunda çok olumlu gördüklerini ifade ettiler. Katılımcılar, programın hem değişik şekillerde kendilerine faydalı olduğunu hem de İngilizcelerini ilerletme konusunda yardımcı olduğunu belirttiler. Katılımcılar, aynı zamanda, World Talk English programının daha iyi bir şekilde hazırlanabileceğini ve hazırlanması gerektiğini ifade ettiler. İlave olarak, katılımcıların algıları ile cinsiyet, yaş grubu ve meslek arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli farklılıkların olduğu ortaya çıktı

Learners’ Perceptions towards Interactive Multimedia Environments

In this study, 113 participants’ (N= 113) perceptions of a specific Interactive Multimedia Environment (IME) (i.e. World Talk English software) and any differences between their perceptions in terms of gender, age, job and Foreign Language Learning (FLL) period were investigated thoroughly in the spring of 2012. The study was both quantitative and qualitative in nature. The results were analysed with SPSS (i.e. Mean, Std. Deviation, Independent Samples t Test, ANOVA, Chi-square). The results revealed that the language learners (LLs) were overwhelmingly in favour of the use of the IME for FLL. The LLs believed that not only did the IME benefit them in different ways, but it also contributed to the enhancement of their learning. They also felt that the IME could and should have been further improved. Moreover, the results revealed that there were some significant differences between their perceptions in terms of gender, age and job

PDF

___

Abobaker, R., & Hussein, I. (2012). Assessing language through computer technology. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 61–63.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(4), 202-232.
Ashworth, D. (1996). Hypermedia and CALL. In Pennington, M.C. (Ed.), The Power of CALL. (pp. 79-95). USA: Athelstan.
Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241-249.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-59 Baturay, M. H., Daloğlu, A., & Yıldırım, S. (2010). Language practice with multimedia supported web-based grammar revision material. ReCALL, 22(3), 313-31.
Bax, S. (2003). CALL - Past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28.
Brett, P. (1997). A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension. System, 25(1), 39-53.
Brett, P. (1999). The design, implementation and evaluation of a multimedia application for second language listening comprehension. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis) The University of Wolverhampton. Wolverhampton, UK.
Brickell, G. (1993). Navigation and learning style. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 103-114.
Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A. (2002). Focussing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52(2), 401-38.
Chung, J. M., Huang, S.C. (1998). The effects of three aural advance organisers for video viewing in a foreign language classroom, System, 26, 553-565.
Chou, C. (2012). Understanding on-screen reading behaviours in academic contexts: A case study of five graduate english-as-a-Second-language students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 411-33.
Clifford, R. (1998). Mirror, mirror, on the wall: Reflections on computer assisted language learning. CALICO Journal, 16(1), 1-11.
Crosby, M. C., Stelovsky, J., & Ashworth, D. (1994). Hypermedia as a facilitator for retention: A Case Study Using Kanji City. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 7(1), 3-13.
De Ridder, I. (2002). Are we conditioned to follow links? Highlights in CALL materials and their impact on the reading process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 183-195.
Deville, G., Kelly, P., Paulussen, H., Vandecasteele, M., & Zimmer, C. (1996). The use of a multi-media support for remedial learning of English with heterogeneous groups of ‘false Beginners’. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9(1), 75-84.
Draper, S. W. (2009). What are learners actually regulating when given feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 306–315. Duncan-Howell, J. (2012). Digital mismatch: Expectations and realities of digital competency amongst pre-service education students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 827-840. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet28/duncan-howell.html. Retrieved on Feb 9, 2013.
Dunkel, P. (1991). The effectiveness research on computer-assisted instruction and computer assisted language learning. In P. Dunkel (Ed.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing: Research Issues and Practice (pp. 5-36). Newbury House.
Dunn, R. (1983). Learning style and its relation to exceptionality at both ends of the spectrum. Exceptional Children, 49, 496-506.
Gardner, D. (1996). Self-assessment for self-access learners. TESOL JOURNAL, Spring, 18-23.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Baltimore: Edward Arnold.
Gillespie, J., & McKee, J. (1999). Resistance to CALL: degrees of student reluctance to use CALL and ICT. ReCALL, 11(1), 38-46.
Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133-67.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). Emerging technologies: From memory palaces to spacing algorithms: Approaches to secondlanguage vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 4–11.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1997). Multimedia, magic and the way students respond to a situated learning environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 127-143.
Herron, C., Dubreil, S., Corrie, C., &, Cole, S. P. (2002). A classroom investigation: Can video improve intermediatelevel French language Students' Ability to Learn about a Foreign Culture? The Modern Language Journal, 86, 36- 53.
Hwa, S. P., Weei, P. S., & Len, L. H. (2012). The effects of blended learning approach through an interactive multimedia e-book on students’ achievement in learning Chinese as a second language at tertiary level.
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 35–50.
Hurd, S., Beaven, T., & Ortega, A. (2001). Developing autonomy in a distance language learning context: Issues and dilemmas for course writers. System, 29, 341-355.
Kalyuga, S. (2000). When using sound with a text or picture is not beneficial for learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology¸16(2),161-72.
Le Mon, R. (1988). Cultural differences affecting the international transfer of computerised language learning. System, 16(1), 37-40.
Mangiafico, L. F. (1996). The Relative effects of classroom demonstration and individual use of interactive multimedia on second language listening comprehension. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis Faculty of Graduate School of Vanderbilt University.
Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123-63 . Mayer, E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
McLoughlin, C. (1999). The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 222-241.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
Mosalanejad, L., Shahsavari, S., Sobhanian, S., & Dastpak, M. (2012). The Effect of virtual versus traditional learning in achieving competency-based skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde47/index.htm. Retrieved on 27 Jan. 2013.
Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as Feedback to Language Learners, Language Learning, 51(4), 719-758.
Nunan, D. (1993). Research methods in language learning. USA: CUP. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach, New York: OUP.
Peter, M. (1994). Investigation into the design of educational multimedia: Video, interactivity and narrative. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis OU, UK
Platt, E. & F. B. Brooks. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development. Language Learning, 52(2), 365-400.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
Ridgway, T. (2000). Listening strategies - I beg your pardon? ELT Journal, 54(2), 179-185.Robinson, G. L. (1989). The CLCCS CALL study: Methods, error feedback, attitudes, and achievement. In W. M. Flint Smith (Ed.): Modern Technology in FLE: Applications and Project (pp. 119-33). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co.
Robinson, G. L. (1991). Effective feedback strategies in CALL: Learning theory and empirical research. In P. Dunkel (Ed.) Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing: Research Issues and Practice (pp. 155-68). USA, New York: Newbury House.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
Sherwood, R. D., Kinzer, C. K., Hasselbring, T. S., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Macro-contexts for learning: Initial findings and issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1(2), 93-108.
Soboleva, O., & Tronenko, N. (2002). A Russian multimedia learning package for classroom use and self-study, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 483-499.
Stevens, V. (1995). A study of student attitudes toward CALL in a self-access student resource centre. System, 19(3), 289-299.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional Design. Melbourne: ACER. TES Teacher. (2004). April 23 2004. p. 18
Trinder, R. (2002). Forum: Multimedia in the business English classroom: The learners' point of view. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 69-84.
Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3-4), 305-19.
Tseng, H. W., & Yeh, H. (2013) Team members’ perceptions of online teamwork learning experiences and building teamwork trust: A qualitative study. Computers & Education, 63, 1–9.
Turel, V. (2014). Design of cultural differences in hypermedia environments. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 2(2), 150-170. DOI: 10.1504/IJHRCS.2014.062766
Turel, V. (2011). Learners' attitudes to repetitious exposure in multimedia listening software. EUROCALL Review, 19 (September), 57-83. http://www.eurocall-languages.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/review19.pdf. Retrieved on Jan 10, 2013
Turel, V. (2010). Advanced Turkish. ReCALL, 22(3), 396-401. http://cls.arizona.edu/resources/review-recall-tur3.htm. Retrieved on Jan 7, 2013.
Turel, V., & McKenna, P. (2013). Design of language learning software. In Bin Zou et al. (Eds.). Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Technological Advances (pp. 188-209). USA, Hershey: IGI-Global.
Türel, V. (2013). The use of educational technology at tertiary level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 28(2), 482-496. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/201328- 2VEHBİ%20TÜREL.pdf. Retrieved on July 10, 2014.
Türel, V. (2012). Design of feedback in interactive multimedia language learning environments. Linguistik Online, 54(4), 35-49. http://www.linguistik-online.de/54_12/tuerel.pdf. Retrieved on 10 July 2013.
Türel, V. (2010). Learners’ attitudes towards the use of CALL for listening enhancement, Proceedings Book, Volume II, IETC – April 26-28, pp. 891-901, Istanbul, Turkey. http://www.iet-c.net/publications.php. Retrieved on July 9, 2013.
Türel, V. (2004). Design of multimedia software: Investigating the design of some elements of interactive multimedia listening software for autonomous intermediate language learners. (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis) The University of Manchester, UK.
Türel, V. (2000). Talk Now! Learning Turkish. CALICO Journal, 18(1), 91-100. https://calico.org/p-137- Talk%20Now!%20Turkish%20(111999).html. Retrieved on Jan 9, 2013.
Voller, P. (1997). (Ed.), Autonomy & Independence in language learning, New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Yu, W-K., Sun, Y-C., & Chang, Yu-J. (2010). When technology speaks language: An evaluation of course management systems used in a language learning context. ReCALL, 22(3), 332-355.
Zhao, Y. (1997). The effects of listeners’ control of speech rate on second language comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 49-68.