___

• Adamson, L. (2012). Exploring principal autonomy in charter, private and public school. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. California State University, California.
• Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., & Sibiano, P. (2013). Can schools be autonomous in a centralized educational system? On formal and actual school autonomy in the Italian context. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(3), 292-310.
• Ağaoğlu, E., Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K. ve Karaköse, T. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin yeterliklerine ilişkin okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin görüşleri (Kütahya ili). Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 159-175.
• Allen, R. (2010). Does school autonomy improve educational outcomes? Judging the performance of foundation secondary schools in England. Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of education, University of London (DoQSS Working Paper), No.10-02. [Available online at: http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1002.pdf], Retrieved on January 01, 2015.
• Aksoy, E. ve Işık, H. (2008). İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin öğretim liderliği rolleri. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 235- 249.
• Aytaç, T. (2000). Okul merkezli yönetim. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Balcı, A. (2007). Etkili okul: okul geliştirme kuram uygulama ve araştırma. (4. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Başaran, İ. E. (1982). Örgütsel davranış. Ankara: Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayını.
• Blasé, J., & Blasé J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in school. Journal In Education Administration, 38(2), 130-141.
• Brown, B.R., & Cooper, G. R. (2000). School-based management: how effective is it? NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 77- 85.
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış, Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.
• Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management: educational policy series. Paris: UNESCO.
• Cheng, Y.C. (1996). School based decision-making and management, school- effectivenes and school-based management: a mechanism for development. London-Newyork-Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
• Çağlar, A., Yakut, Ö. ve Karadağ, E. (2005). Ilköğretim okulu müdürlerinin öğretmenler tarafından algılanan kişilik özellikleri ve liderlik davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 6(1), 61-80.
• ChuHo, S. E. (2005). Effect of school decentralization and school climate on student mathematics performance: the case of Hong Kong. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 4, 47-64. DOI: 10.1007/s10671-005-1546-7.
• Clark, M. L. (2008). An examination of the relationship between school leadership autonomy and student learning. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate school leaders licensure consortium: standards for school leaders. Washington, DC: The Council of Chief State School Officers.
• Dewey, J. (1939). Türk maarifi hakkında rapor. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• Duignan, P. (2006). Educational leadership key challenges and ethical tensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 43 Iss 4 pp. 338 – 356, [Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230510605405], Retrieved on May 12, 2015.
• Dwyer, D.; Rowan, B., & Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18 (3), 34-64.
• Eurydice. (2007). School autonomy in Europe, policies and measures. Eurydice. doi: 10.2766/34099.
• Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2008). School decentralization: helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind. Journal of Public Economics, 92 (10-11), 2106-2120.
• Gargallo, M. A. S. (2013). Autonomy and pluralism in the education system: a case study of Spanish public schools in the international context. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 7(1), 61-87, DOI: 10.1080/15582159.2013.759843.
• Gawlik, M. (2008). Breaking loose: Principal autonomy in charter and public schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 783-804.
• Gertler, P. Patrinos, A. H., & Rubio-Codina, M. (2007). Methodological issues in the evaluation of school-based management reforms. World Bank. [Available online at: http://www.ifs.org.uk/edepo/rubio_methodological.pdf ], Retrieved on April 24, 2015.
• Glanz, J. (2006). What every principal should know about instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational Change. Reflections on the practice of instructional and educational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33 (3), 329-351.
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, Vol.30 (2), 95-110.
• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the Instructional Management Behaviors of Principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86 (2), 217-247.
• Hannah, S. T., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Jennings, P. L., & Tatcher, R. W. (2013). The Psychological and Neurological Bases of Leader Self-Complexity and Effects on Adaptive Decision-Making. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 98(3), 393-411, DOI: 10.1037/a0032257
• Hanushek, E. A., Link, S., & Woessman, L. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212-232.
• Henning, John E., & Robinson, Victoria. (2002). Change and transformation in an educational leadership program. Perreault, George and Lunenburg, Fred C. (eds). Changing World of School Administration. National Council of Professors of Educational Administration-NCPEA, Huntsville, TX. ISBN-1-57886-019-9PUB.
• Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (2008). Instructional leadership: a research-based guide to learning in schools. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Isoye, S. T. (2011). School leadership capacity and student achievement. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Northern Illınois University, Illinois.
• Kabadayı, R. (1997). Eğitimde yerellemeye mesleki teknik eğitimden başlanmalıdır. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler. Ankara: TODAİE, Yerel Yönetimler Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi, 6, 2.
• Kapusuzoğlu, Ş. (2008). Okula dayalı yönetimde denetimin işlevselliği ve katkısının değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1 (16), 143-155.
• Keating, J. S. (2006). The relationship between principal autonomy and student achievement. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Pepperdine University, California.
• Kim, E., Kim, K., Kim, D., & Kim, E. (2006). Improving leadership country background report for Korea. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.
• Klar, H. W., & Brewer C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs school: an examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49: 768-808. DOI: 10.1177/0013161X13482577.
• Lee, M., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2011). Leadership challenges in international schools in the Asia Pacific region: evidence from programme implementation of the International Baccalaureate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, Theory and Practice, 15 (3), 289-310.
• Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation.
• Leithwood, K. A., & Reihl, C. (2005). What do we already know about educational leadership? Firestone, W. A. and Reihl C. (eds). A new agenda for research in educational leadership. New York: Teacher Collage Press. ISBN: 0-8077-4630-4.
• Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: from research to result. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• McCarthy, M. M. & Martha M. (2002). The Changing Environment for School Leaders: Market Forces. Perreault, George and Lunenburg, Fred C. (eds) Changing World of School Administration. National Council of Professors of Educational Administration-NCPEA, Huntsville, TX. ISBN-1-57886-019-9PUB.
• Mizrav, E. (2014). Could principal autonomy produce better schools? Evidence from the schools and staffing survey. Unpublished Master Thesis. Georgetown University.
• Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: a research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership and Management, 27-2, 179-201. DOI: 10.1080/13632430701237420.
• Nechyba, T. J. (2003). Centralization, fiscal federalism and private school attendance. International Economic Review, 44 (1), 179-204
• OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 Results: What makes school successful? Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV). OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2013b). Education policy outlook: Mexico. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2013c). Leadership for 21st century learning, educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2013d). What makes school successful? resources, policies and practices (Volume IV). OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 results: what students know and can do: student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I).OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 technical report. OECD Publishing.
• Özdemir, S. (1996). Okula dayalı yönetim. Eğitim Yönetimi, 2(3), 421-426.
• Özden, Y. (1996). Okullarda katılmalı yönetim. Eğitim Yönetimi, 2(3), 427-438.
• Paletta, A. (2014). Improving students’ learning through school autonomy: evidence from the International Civic and Citizenship Survey. Journal of School choice: International Research and Reform, 8:3, 381-409, DOI: 10.1080/15582159.2014.942173.
• Pettiegrew, H. (2013). The perceptions of principal ınstructional leadership practices on 8th grade Ohio achievement assessment (OAA). Unpublished Master Thesis. Cleveland State University, Cleveland.
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol.44 (5), 635-674.
• Ryan, A. R. (2013). An examination of the relation between self-perceived leadership practices of high school principals and student achievement. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. University of Oregan, Eugene.
• Schindler, K. A. (2012). An analysis of the relationship of perceived principal instructional leadership behaviors and student academic achievement. Unpublished Master Thesis. Tarleton State University, Stephenville.
• Sergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership; a collection of articles. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
• Shatzer, R. H., Caldarella, P., Hallam, P. R., & Brown, B. L. (2014). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement: implication for practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 445-459.
• Şişman, M. ve Turan, S. (2003). Eğitimde yerelleşme ve demokratikleşme çabaları: teorik bir çözümleme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 34, 300-315.
• Tahaoğlu F. Ve Gedikoğlu, T. (2009). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin liderlik rolleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 15-58, 274-298.
• TEDMEM. (2015). Ulusal Eğitim Programı 2015-2022. Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği.
• Tillman, L. C. (2002). The Impact of Diversity in Educational Administration. Perreault, George and Lunenburg, Fred C. (eds). Changing World of School Administration. National Council of Professors of Educational Administration-NCPEA, Huntsville, TX. ISBN-1-57886-019-9PUB.
• Tobin, J. (2014). Management and leadership issues for school building leaders. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation-NCPEA, Vol. 9, No. 1. ISSN: 2155-9635
• UNESCO. (2005). Global monitoring report 2005: education for all-the quality imperative. UNESCO.
• Wahlstrom, K. L., Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., & Anderson, S. A. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: executive summary of research findings. St. Paul, Mn: University of Minnesota. [Available online at: http://www.cehd.umn.edu/carei/Leadership/Learning-fromLeadership_ExecutiveSummary_July- 2010.pdf. ], Retrieved on May 23, 2015.
• Wallace Foundation. (2009). Assessing the effeciveness of school leaders: new directions and new processes. Wallace Foundation. [Available online at: www.wallacefoundation.org], Retrieved on December 24, 2014.
• Weber, J. (1996). Leading the instructional program. In S. Smith. ve P. Piele (Eds.), School leadership. (pp. 253-278). Clearinghouse of Educational Management. Eugene, Oregon.
• Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and students achivievement: the elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425.
• Woessmann, L., Luedemann, E., Schuetz, G., & West, M. R. (2009). School accountability, autonomy and choice around the world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Wohlstetter, P., Wenning, R., & Briggs, K. L. (1995). Charter schools in the United States: The question of autonomy. Educational Policy, 9(4), 331-358.
• Yalçınkaya, M. (2004). Okul merkezli yönetim. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 21-34.