Okul Yöneticilerinin Liderlik Stilleri ile Yıldırma Arasındaki İlişki

Bu araştırmanın amacı, okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stillerinin, öğretmenlere yönelik işyeri yıldırmasının (workplace bullying) yordayıcısı olup olmadığını saptamaktır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, 2005-2006 eğitim-öğretim yılında random tekniği ile seçilen Ankara, Yozgat, Kastamonu ve Van illerinde devlete bağlı 25 ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim okulunda görev yapan toplam 500 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada, ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin dönüşümcü ve işlemci liderlik stilini belirlemek için Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5 – x short (MLQ) kullanıldı. Yıldırma davranışlarına maruz kalma durumu, olumsuz davranış sorularını içeren Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) kullanılarak ölçüldü. Verilerin hesaplanmasında Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı ve Çoklu Regresyon Analizi tekniklerinden yararlanıldı. Araştırmanın sonucunda, okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stillerini düşük düzeyde gerçekleştirdikleri, okulda öğretmenlerin orta düzeyde yıldırma (bullying, mobbing) mağduru olduğu, okul yöneticilerinin laissez-faire liderlik davranışlarını gerçekleştirdikçe, öğretmenlere yönelik yıldırmanın gerçekleşme düzeyinde artış yaşandığı, telkinle güdüleme ile laissez- faire liderliğin yıldırma üzerinde anlamlı bir yordayıcı özellik taşıdığı sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır.

___

  • Clark, R., Walker, M. & Keith, S. (2002). Experimentally assessing the student impacts of out-of-class communication: Office visits and the student experience. Journal of College Student Development, 43(6), 824-837.
  • Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, H.A.P. & Scherpbier, A.J.J.A. (2003). From quality assurance to total quality management: How can quality assurance result in continuous improvement in health professions education? Education for Health, 16(2), 210-217.
  • Emanuel,R. & Adams, J.N. (2006). Assessing college student perceptions of instructor customer service via the quality of instructor service to students (QISS) questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 535- 549.
  • Endo, J. & Harpel, R. (1982). The effect of student-faculty interaction on students' educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 115-136.
  • Guolla, M. (1999). Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationships: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (Summer), 87-97.
  • Houston, D. & Studman, C.J. (2001). Quality management and the university: a deafening clash of metaphors? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (5), 475-487.
  • King, M. (1993). Advising models and delivery systems. In Margaret King (Ed.). Academic advising: Organizing and delivering services for student succes,s (pp. 47-54), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kuh, G. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123-155.
  • Kuh, G. & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education 24(3),309-332.
  • Noel-Levitz, Inc. (2005) National online learners priorities report. 2005 Research Report, (Iowa City, Noel-Levitz Center for Enrollment Management).
  • Palihawadana, D. & Holmes, G. (1999). Modelling module evaluation in marketing education. Quality Assurance in Education, 7(1), 41-46.
  • Penny, A.R. (2003). Changing the agenda for research into students’ views about university teaching: four shortcomings of SRT research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 399-411.
  • Popli, S. (2005). Ensuring customer delight: a quality approach to excellence in management education. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 17-24.
  • Ramos, M. (1993). Evaluation, recognition, and reward of academic advising. In Margaret King (Ed.). Academic advising:Organizing and delivering services for student success (pp. 63-74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Raushi, T. (1993). Developmental academic advising. Margaret King (Ed.). Academic advising: Organizing and delivering services for student success (pp. 5-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Saarinen,T. (2005). Quality’ in the Bologna process: from ‘competitive edge’ to quality assurance techniques. European Journal of Education, 40(2), 189-204.
  • Srikanthan, G. & Dalrymple, J.F. (2002). Developing a holistic model for quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(3), 215-224.
  • Thompson, M. (2001). Informal student-faculty interaction: Its relationship to educational gains in science and mathematics among community college students. Community College Review, 29(1), 35-57.
  • Welsh, J.F., Nunez, W.J. & Petrosko, J. (2006). Assessing and cultivating support for strategic planning: searching for best practices in a reform environment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(6), 693-708.
  • Willinsky, J. (2005). Just say know? Schooling the knowledge society. Educational Theory, 55(1), 97-111.