Okul Öncesi Dönemde Önleyici Müdahale Edici Programların Karşılaştırılması

Önleyici müdahale programlarının giderek çoğalması çocukların temel gereksinimleri doğrultusunda en uygun programı seçmeyi zorlaştırabilmektedir. Programların hangi açılardan donanımlı ve etkili olduğunu belirleyebilmek için temel özelliklerinin, ortak ve farklı yönlerinin tartışıldığı çalışmalara gereksinim duyulmaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı önleyici ve müdahale edici bilimsel çalışmalardaki teoriksel ve uygulamaya dönük gelişmeleri aktarmak ve bu kapsamda okul öncesi dönemde yaygın olarak kullanılan bilimsel açıdan etkililiği kanıtlanmış temel önleyici müdahale programlarının içeriklerini, felsefelerini, eğitim süreçlerini ve etkinliklerini tartışarak ortak özelliklerini ve farklılıklarını ortaya çıkarmaktır. Böylece çok boyutlu riskli davranışların önlenmesinde ya da ortadan kaldırılmasında daha etkin stratejilerin kullanılmasına katkıda bulunulacak uygun programlar seçilebilecektir. Önleyici müdahale programlarının temel özelliklerinin açığa çıkartılması farklı müdahale programlarının birbirlerini tamamlayacak şekilde bütünleştirilebilmesine de olanak sağlayacaktır. Bu makale, alanda gereksinim duyulan Türk toplumunda yaşanılan sorunlar ve zorluklar doğrultusunda Türk kültürüne uygun şekilde geliştirilecek olan ya da yeniden yapılandırılacak olan müdahale programlarının yapılanmasına da katkıda bulunacaktır.

The Comparison of Preventive Intervention Programs in Early Childhood Period

Increased number of preventive intervention programs lead to some difficulties to decide which program is the most appropriate one to meet children's primary needs. For this reason more studies are needed to determine which aspects of the programs are well equipped and effectively designed by revealing common and different features between those. The goal of this article is pointed out by theoretical and practical improvement in the area of interventive prevention science. In this context commonly used and scientifically proved preventive intervention programs in early childhood are discussed in terms of their contents, philosophies, educational processes and efficiencies based on common features and differences to evaluate their effectiveness. By doing this, it would be possible to use more effective strategies by selecting appropriate programs to prevent or remove risky behaviors in different dimensions. Additionally, revealing basic features of preventive intervention programs would provide perspective for a completed integration between school-based prevention programs. In this sense this article would be expected to make an important contribution in developing or restructuring of preventive programs considering Turkish culture which is needed to be implemented based on difficulties and challenges in Turkish society.

___

  • AÇEV (2005). Okul Öncesi Eğitimde Kalite: Üniversitelerin Rolü.toplantı Raporu: İstanbul (http://www.acev.org/arastirmalarimiz.php?id=24&lang=tr adresinden 22.07.2010 tarihinde indirilmiştir.)
  • AÇEV (2009). Türkiye'de Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi: Erişim, Eşitlik ve Kalite. (http://www.acev.org/arastirmalarimiz.php?id=24&lang=tr adresinden 22.07.2010 tarihinde indirilmiştir.)
  • Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant - mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969 - 1025.
  • Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44 (4), 709 - 716.
  • Ainsworth, M.D.S. & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46 (4), 333 - 341.
  • Anlıak, Ş. ve Arda, T.B. (2011) Alternatif Düşünme Stratejilerinin Desteklenmesi Projesi. Ege Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Proje No:09 EĞF 10.
  • Anlıak, Ş. ve Sahin, D. (2009) An observational study for evaluating the effects of interpersonal problem solving skills training on behavioral dimensions, Early Child Development and Care, First Published on: 27 May 2009.
  • Anlıak, Ş. (2004). Farklı Eğitim Yaklaşımları Uygulayan Okul Öncesi Eğitim Kurumlarında Kişiler Arası Bilişsel Problem Çözme Becerisi Programının Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Psikoloji Anabilim Dalı, İzmir: Türkiye.
  • Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., & Gest, S. D. (2008). Promoting academic and social-emotional school readiness: The head start REDI program. Child Development.,79(6), 1802-1817.
  • Bingham, A. (1983). Çocuklarda problem çözme yeteneklerinin geliştirilmesi. Oğuzkan, F. A. (Çev.). İstanbul: MEB Basımevi.
  • Castro, F. G., Barrera, M. & Martinez, C. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5,1, 41 - 45.
  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2003). Safe and sound: An educational leader's guide to evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved October 28, 2010 from: http://www.casel.org/downloads/CASEL2003AR.pdf
  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems. II. Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 648-657.
  • Coşkun, L. (2008). An Adaptation and Pilot Implementation of an Effective Intervention Program Targeting Externalizing Behaviors in Early Childhood. Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi. Koç Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Psikoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul: Türkiye.
  • Denham, S.A. & Burton, R. (2003). Social and emotional prevention and intervention programming for preschoolers. New York, NY Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • Denham, S. A. & Weissberg, R. P. (2004). Social-emotional learning in early childhood: What we know and where to go from here. E. Chesebrough, P. King, T. P. Gullotta, & M. Bloom (Eds.), A blueprint for the promotion of prosocial behavior in early childhood (pp. 13-50). New York : Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers. Retrieved October 28, 2010 from http:// www.casel.org.
  • Dereli, E. (2008) Çocuklar İçin Sosyal Beceri Eğitim Programının 6 Yas Çocukların Sosyal Problem Çözme Becerilerine Etkisi Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Çocuk Gelişimi ve Ev Yönetimi Anabilim Dalı, Konya: Türkiye.
  • Dinçer, Ç. (1995). Anaokuluna Devam Eden 5 Yaş Grubu Çocuklarına Kişiler Arası Problem Çözme Becerilerinin Kazandırılmasında Eğitimin Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Eğitimi Programı Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara: Türkiye.
  • Dinçer, Ç., Anliak, Ş., Şahin, D.ve Karaman, G.(2009). Kişilerarası Bilişsel Problem Çözme Programının Okul Öncesi Eğitimi Kurumlarında Yaygınlaştırılması Projesi" Uluslar arası Katılımlı II. Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Kongresi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Domitrovich, C. E., Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. & Cortes, R. (1999). Manual for the Preschool PATHS Curriculum. South Deerfield, MA: Channing-Bete Company.
  • Domitrovich, C. E. & Greenberg, M. T. (2000). The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs for school aged children. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 11, 193-222.
  • Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R. & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children's social and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the Preschool PATHS Program. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28 (2), 67- 91.
  • Domitrovich, C. E.,. Bradshaw C. P., Greenberg, M. T., Embry, D ., Poduska J. M. & Ialongo N. S., (2010). Integrated models of school-based preventıon: Logıc and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 71-88.
  • Durlak JA. & DuPre EP. (2008). Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3- 4), 327-50.
  • Durlak J. A. (2010). The Importance of doing well in whatecer you do: A commentary on the special section, "implementation research in early childhood education". Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 348-357.
  • Elias, M. J. (2006). The connection between academic and social-emotional learning. M. J. Elias & H. Arnold (Eds.), The educator's guide to emotional intelligence and academic achievement social-emotional learning in the classroom (syf. 4-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Retrieved 28 October, 2010 from http:// www.casel.org .
  • Elias, M. J., Parker, S. J., Kash, V. M., Weissberg, R. P., & O"Brien, M. U. (2008). Social and emotional learning, moral education, and character education. In L. Nucci &165 D. Narvaez (Eds.), Handbook of moral education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
  • Eliot, D.S. & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in dısseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5 (1), 47-53.
  • Feiner, R. D., Brand S., Adan, A. M., Mulhall, P.F., Sartain, B. & Dubois, D.L. (1994). Restructuring the ecology of the school as an aprroach to prevention during school transitions. Prevention Human Services, 10 (2) ,103-136.
  • Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T. & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in schoolaged children: The effects of the PATHS Curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 117-136.
  • Greenberg, M. T. & Kusche, C. A. (1998). Preventative intervention for school-aged deaf children: The PATHS curriculum. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 49-63.
  • Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., Utne O'Brien, M., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H. & Elias, M. J. (2003).
  • Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466-474.
  • Greenberg, M. T. & Kusche, C. A. (2006). Building social and emotional competence: The PATHS curriculum. In S. R. Jimerson & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety (pp. 395-412). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Hahn, R., Fuqua-Whitley, D., Wethington, H., Lowy, J., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., . . .(2007). Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violent and aggressive behavior: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,33, S114-S114-S129. doi:10,1016/j.amepre.2007.04.012.
  • Harris, V.W. & Sherman, J.A. (1973). Use and analysis of the "Good Behavior Game" to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124.
  • Hawkins J. D., Horn M. L.V., & Arthur, M. W. (2004). Community variation in risk and protective factors and substance use outcomes. Prevention Science, 5(4), 213-220.
  • Hill, L. G., Maucione, K. & Hood, B. K. (2007). A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prevention Science, 8, 25-34.Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. T. & Walls, C. (2003).
  • Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS Curriculum. Prevention Science, 4 (1), 55-63.
  • Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. & Kusche, C. (2004). Sustained effects of the PATHS curriculum on the social and psychological adjustment of children in social and psychological adjustment of children in special education. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 12(2), 66-78.
  • Katkat, D. & Mızrak, O. (2003). Öğretmen adaylarının pedogojik eğitimlerinin problem çözme becerilerine etkisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 158.
  • Kusche, C. A. & Greenberg, M. T. (1994) The PATHS Curriculum. Seattle: Developmental Research and Programs.
  • Linares, O. L., Rosbruch, N., Stern, M. B., Edwards, M. E., Walker, G., & Abikoff, H. B. (2005). Developing cognitive-social-emotional competencies to enhance academic learning. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 405- 417.
  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic resilience process in development. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 227-238.
  • Mayer, G.R. (1995). Preventing antisocial behavior in the schools, Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 28(4), 467- 478.
  • O' Connell, M. E., Boat T. ve Warner, K. E., (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: progress and possibilities, Editors;172 Committee on the Prevention of Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse Among Children, Youth and Young Adults: Research Advances and Promising Interventions; Institute of Medicine; National Research Council ISBN: 0-309-12675-4.592.
  • Ogilvy, C.M. (1994). Social skills training with children and adolescents: a review of the evidence on effectiveness. Educational Psychology, 14, 71-82.
  • Raver, C. C., & Knitzer, J. (2002). Ready to enter: What research tells policymakers about strategies to promote social and emotional school readiness among three- andfour-year-olds. (Policy Paper No. 3). New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.
  • Riggs N. R., Greenberg, M. T., Kusche , C. A. & Pentz, M. A. (2006). The mediational role of neurocognition in the behavioral outcomes of a social-emotional prevention program in elementary school students: Effects of the PATHS Curriculum. Prevention Science, 7, 91-102.
  • Shure, M. B. (1999) Preventing violence the problem solving way. Juvenile Justice Bulletin,1-11.
  • Shure, M.B. ve Spivack, G. (1980). Interpersonal problem solving as a mediator of behavioral adjustment in preschool and kindergarden children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 1, 29-44.
  • Shure, M.B. & Spivack, G. (1982). Interpersonal problem-solving ın young children: a cognitive aproach to prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(3), 341-356
  • Shure, M.B. (1994). Raising a thinking child. Henny Holt &Company Inc.
  • Shure, M.B. (2001). I can problem solve (An interpersonal cognitive problem-solving program) (ICPS). 2.baskı, Illinois: Research Press. Spence, S. H. (2003). Social skills training with children and young people: theory, evidence and practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 8 (2), 84-96.
  • Taub, J. (2001). Evaluation of the Second Step violence prevention program at a rural elementary school. School Psychology Review, 31(2),186-200.
  • The Good Behavior Game Manual, Retrieved Nowember 10, 2010 from http://www.jhsph.edu/prevention/Publications/gbg.pdf. Webster-Stratton, (1994). Advancing videotape parent training: A comparison study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 583-593.
  • Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, J. ve Hammond, M. (2001) Social skills and problem- solving training for children with early-onset conduct problems: Who benefits? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(7), 943 - 952.
  • Webster-Stratton, C. & Reid, M. J. (2003). Treating conduct problems and strengthening social emotional competence in young children (ages 4-8 years): The dina dinosaur treatment program. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 11(3): 130- 143.
  • Webster-Stratton, C. & Reid, M. J. (2004). Strengthening social and emotional competence in young children -- The foundation for early school readiness and success. Infants and Young Children, 17(2), 96-113.Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J. & Hammond, M. (2004). Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: ıntervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 33 (1), 105-124.
  • Webster-Stratton, C., Reid M. J., and Stoolmiller, M. (2008). Preventing aggression and improving social, e motional and academic competence: Evaluation of dina dinosaur classroom curriculum in high risk schools.
  • Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, J. & Hammond, M. (2008). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in Head Start. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(5), 471- 488.
  • Webster-Stratton, C. & Herman, K. (2010). Disseminating incredible years series early-ıntervention programs: integration and sustaining services between school and home. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 36-54.
  • Webster-Stratton, C. & Reid, M. J. (2010). The Incredible Years Parents, Teachers, and Children Training Series: A Multifaceted Treatment Approach for Young Children with Conduct Disorders. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.) Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents (pp. 194-210). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
  • Weissberg, R. P., & O'Brien, M. U. (2004). What works in school-based social and emotional learning programs for positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 86--97.
  • Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/37834180?accountid=13158 Wilson, S.J., and Lipsey, M.J. (2007). Effectiveness of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(l/ 2),130-143.
  • Yannacci, J. & Rivard, J. (2006) Matrix of Children's Evidence-Based Interventions, NASMHPD Research Institute Inc., systemsofcare.samhsa.gov/headermenus/docsHM/MatrixFINAL1.pdf
  • Zins, J.E. & Elias, M.E. (2006). G.G. Bear & K.M. Minke (Eds.) Children's needs III, (pp 1-13). National Assocation of School Psychologists.
  • Zins, J.E., Payton, J.W., Weissberg, R.P. & O'Brien, M.U. (2007). In G. Matthews, M. Zeidner, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns (pp. 376-395). New York: Oxford University Pres.