Identified succes factors of graduates in an online program

Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında, öğrencilerin başarılarını etkileyen özel faktörler ve karakteristiklerin tanımlanması üzerine birçok araştırma yapılmaktadır. Ancak, halen hem öğrenciler hemde eğitmenler için, başarılı çevrimiçi teşebbüsler oluşturmak için gerekli koşullar hakkında çok fazla belirsizlik vardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir veya iki değişkenle kısıtlamaksızın mezunların bakış açısından çevrimiçi öğrencilerin başarılarını etkileyen faktörleri incelemektir. Çalışma, 2009 yılında Çevrimiçi Bilgi Teknolojileri Sertifika Programı mezunu 40 katılımcıyla yapılmıştır. Verileri analiz etmek için nitel yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar dört ana faktörde kategorize edilmiştir: demografik ve kişisel özellikleri, çalışma stratejileri, motivasyon ve eüdleşim. Çalışmanın sonuçları, gelecek araştırma çalışmaları ve öğrencilerinin başarılı olmaları için nasıl yardım edeceği konusunda fazla bilgi sahibi olmayan diğer çevrimiçi öğrenme kurumları için değerli olabilecektir.

Bir çevrimiçi programda mezunların tanımladığı başarı faktörleri

There has been a growing body of research on the identification of particular characteristics or factors that can be used to predict learners' success in online learning environments. However, there still exists much uncertainty about the conditions that are essential to create a successful online venture for both learners and educators. The purpose of the study is to investigate the factors that support online learners' success from the online graduates1 perspective without constraining it to one or two constructs. The study included 40 participants who graduated from Online Information Technologies Certificate Program in 2009. The qualitative methods were used to analyze die data. The findings were categorized under four main factors: demographic and personal characteristics, studying strategies, motivation and interaction. The results of the study might be worthy of consideration for future research studies and other online learning institutions who knows little about how to assist learners to be successful.

___

  • Azevedo, R.. Guthrie, J. T.. & Siebert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students' conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87-111.
  • Bekele, T.A. (2008). Impact of technology-supported learning environments in higher education: Issues in and for research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Norway.
  • Berenson, R., Boyles, G., & Weaver. A. (2008). Emotional intelligence as a predictor for success in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http:/Avwvv.eric.ed.goVERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/3e/3c/36.pdf.
  • Blochcr, .1. M., Monies, L. S., Willis, E.M. & Tucker, G. (2002). Online learning: Examining the successful student profile. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.
  • Cheung, L., & Kan, A. (2002 ). Evaluation of factors related to student performance in a distance-learning business communication course. Journal of Education for Business, 77(5), 257-263.
  • DeTure, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success İn online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 21-38.
  • Ergul, H. (2004). Relationship between student characteristics and academic achievement in distance education and application on students of Anadolu University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 5(2), Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojdel4/articles/ergul.htm
  • Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman, (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 127-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbautn.
  • Güngör, C. & Aşkar, P. (2004). E-öğrenmenin ve bilişsel stilin başarı ve internet özyeterlik algızı üzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitini Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 116-125.
  • Mara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students' distress with a web-based distance education course, Information, Communication and Society, 3(4), 557-579.
  • Holcomb, L, B., King, F. B., & Brown, S. W. (2004). Student traits and attributes contributing to success İti online courses: Evaluation of university online courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3), 1-17.
  • isler, V (1998). Sanal üniversite: Düşünceler ve Deneyimler. Paper presented at Bilgi Teknolojileri Işığında Eğitim (BTIE), TBD and IEEE Türkiye Bölümü, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Joo, Y,J., Bong, M. & Choi, H-J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (2), 5-17.
  • Kerr, M.S., Rynearson K., & Kerr M.C. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success, hit e me t and Higher Education, 9(2), 91-105.
  • King, F. B. (2001). Asynchronous distance education courses employing Web-based instruction: Implications of individual study skills self-efficacy and self-regulated learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs-Mansfield.
  • Lim, C. K. (2001). Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictor of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 41-51.
  • Lim, D. H., & Kim, H. J. (2003). Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online learning and learning application. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31 (4), 423-439.
  • Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional (actors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 282-293.
  • Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L. & Yoon, S. W. (2006). Combined effect of instructional and learner variables on course outcomes within an online learning environment Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 255-269.
  • Loomis, K.D. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing the LASSI model to class performance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 223-232.
  • Manderaach, B. J., Donnelli, E. & Hebert-Dailey, A. (2006). Learner attribute research juxtaposed with classroom practice: Predictors of success in the accelcrated, online classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 3 (2), Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http://www.thejeo.com/Volume3Number2/MandernachFinaf .pdf
  • Menclıaca, M. P. & Bekele, T. A. (2008), Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231 -252.
  • Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221-231.
  • Reeves, T. C. (1997). Established and emerging evaluation paradigms for instructional design. In C. R. Dills & A. J. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms (pp. 163-178). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Sankaran, S„ & Bui, T. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A study in Web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3), 191-198.
  • Schrum, L. & Hong, S. (2002). From the field: characteristics of successful tertiary online students and strategies of experienced online educators. Education and Information Technologies, 7(1), 5-16.
  • Sheppard, R. S. (2002) Predictors of student success in distance education coutscs.-Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morganstovvn, West Virginia. Retrieved December 2 f, 2009, from hUps://eidr.wvu.edu/etd/documentdata.eTD?documentid=2665
  • Shin, N. (2003). Transactional Presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Ediication,24(1),69-86.
  • Shih, C. C., & Gamon, J. (2001). Web-based learning: Relationships among student motivation, attitude, learning styles, and achievement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 2(4), 12-20.
  • Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70.
  • Vonderwell, S., & Savery, J, (2004). Online learning: Strident role and readiness. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 3(3), Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http://wmv.tojet.net/articles/335.pdf
  • Wang, A. Y. & Newlin, M, H. (2002). Predictors of web student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 151-163.
  • Wojciechowski, A. & Palmer, L.B (2005) Individual student characteristics: can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Education, 8(2), Retrieved December 21, 2009, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer82/wojciechowski82,htm
  • Yukselturk, E. & Bulut S. (2007) Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83.