Öğrenci Akademik Destek Ölçeği Türkçe Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Öğrenci Akademik Destek Ölçeği'nin (ÖADÖ, Mazer ve Thompson, 2011) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırma 550 (Kadın: 290, Erkek: 260) üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Dilsel eşdeğerlik çalışmasında, Türkçe ve orijinal formlarında bulunan maddeler arasındaki korelasyon katsayılarının .78 ile .96 arasında değiştiği bulunmuştur. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde dört boyutlu modelin iyi uyum verdiği görülmüştür (x2= 246.07, sd= 80, RMSEA= .083, CFI= .99, IFI= .99, GFI= .94, AGFI= .91, SRMR= .044). Ölçeğin madde toplam korelasyon katsayıları .50 ile .75 arasında sıralanmaktadır. ÖADÖ'nün iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayıları bilgi desteği alt boyutu için .82, saygı desteği alt boyutu için .91, motivasyon desteği alt boyutu için .81, rahatlatma desteği alt boyutu için .84 olarak bulunmuştur. Test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayıları .77 ile .83 arasında bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar ÖADÖ'nün Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir

Turkish Version of Student Academic Support Scale: The Study of Validity and Reliability

The aim of this research is to adapt the Student Academic Support Scale (Mazer & Thompson, 2011) to Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. The research was conducted on 550 university students. Results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that this scale yielded 4 factors, as original form and that the model was well fit (x2= 246.07, df= 80, RMSEA= .083, CFI= .99, IFI= .99, GFI= .94, AGFI= .91, SRMR= .044). Internal consistency coefficients of subscales varied between .81-.91 and test-retest reliability coefficients varied between .77-.83. Corrected item-total correlations ranged .50 to .75. Thus Student Academic Support Scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in education

___

  • Alfaro, C. A., Umana-Talor, J. A., & Bamaca, Y.M. (2006). The influence of academic support on latino adolescents’ academic motivation. Family Relations, 55, 279–291.
  • Braithwaite, D. O., McBride, M. C., & Schrodt, P. (2003). Parent teams and the everyday interactions of co-parenting in stepfamilies. Communication Reports, 16 (2), 93-111.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Chen, J. L. J. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127.
  • Clark-Unite, C. (2007). A critique of supplemental instruction programme. A case study at the University of Port Elizabeth (1993-2005). Unpublished thesis, University of Port Elizabeth.
  • De Berard, M. S., Spielmans, G. I., & Julka, D C. (2004). Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. College Student Journal, 38(1), 66-80.
  • Elliott, J. (2007). Providing academic support for teachers and students in high stakes learning environments. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23(2), 87-107.
  • Forman, E. (1988). The effects of social support and school placement on the self-concept of LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(2), 115–124
  • Giddan, N. S. (1988). Community and social support for college students. Springfield, IL: C. C.Thomas. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Jones, A. C. (2008). The effects of out-of-class support on student satisfaction and motivation to learn. Communication Education, 57(3), 373-388.
  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Kenny, M. E., & Rice, K. G. (1995). Attachment to parents and adjustments in late adolescent college students: Current status, applications, and future considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 23(3), 433-456.
  • Keup, J. R., & Mullins, E. (2010). Findings from national survey of peer leadership experinces and outcomes. Concurent session presented at the 29th Annual Conference on The First-Year Experince, Denver, February.
  • Kloomok, S., & Cosden, M. (1994). Self-concept in children with learning disabilities: The relationship between global self-concept, academic “discounting,” nonacademic self-concept, and perceived social support. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(2), 140–153.
  • Kong, W. (2009). Student feedback on tutor and academic support of Wawasan Open University a four-semester study. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(4), 363–379.
  • Lafreniere, K. D., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (1997). Influences of leaving home, perceived family support, and gender of the transition to university. Guidance ve Counseling, 12(4), 14-18.
  • Malecki, K. C., & Demaray, K.M. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: Development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 1-18.Mazer, J. P., & Thompson, B. (2011). The validity of the student academic support scale: Associations with social support and relational closeness. Communication Reports, 24(2), 74-85.
  • Maxwell, M. (2001). Peer tutoring: An overview, history and research on program effectiveness. Journal of the National Tutoring Association, 1(1), 8-18.
  • McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y., & Smith, D. A. F (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of literature. Michigan: The University of Michigan.
  • Mortenson, S. T. (2006). Cultural differences and similarities in seeking social support as a response to academic failure: A comparison of American and Chinese college students. Communication Education, 55(2), 127-146.
  • Mpofu, E. (2003). Enhancing social acceptance of early adolescents with physical disabilities: Effects of role salience, peer interaction, and academic support interventions. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50(4), 435-454.
  • Penn-Edwards, S., & Donnison, S. (2011). Engaging with higher education academic support: A first year student teacher transition model. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 566-580.
  • Rothman, H. R., & Cosden, M. (1995). The relationship between self-perception of a learning disability and achievement, self-concept and social support. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(3), 203–212.
  • Shaver, P., Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Transition to college: Network changes, social skills, and loneliness. In S. W. Duck ve D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Smuts, K. B. (1996). The role of student leaders in supplemental instruction. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(3), 225-231.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 599-623.
  • Tinto, V. (2005). Reflections on retention and persistence: Institutional actions on behalf of student persistence. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation, and Development, 2(1), 89-97.
  • Thompson, B. (2008). How college freshmen communicate student academic support: A grounded theory study. Communication Education, 57(1), 123-144.
  • Thompson, B., & Mazer, J. P. (2009). College student ratings of student academic support: Frequency, importance, and modes of communication. Communication Education, 58(3), 433–458
  • Wenz-Gross, M., & Siperstein, G. N. (1997). Importance of social support in the adjustment of children with learning problems. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 183–193.