Development of an Anxiety Scale for Chemistry Preparation of an Anxiety Tree

Bu araştırma, Türkiye’de öğrenim gören lise 10. ve 11. sınıfta kimya dersini alan öğrencilerin, kimya dersine yönelik kaygı düzeylerini ölçebilecek bir araç geliştirmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçek; öğrenci görüşleri ile uzman önerileri göz önünde bulundurularak kimya dersiyle ilgili kaygıları belirleyici tutumları ifade eden 45 cümlelik madde havuzunun 365 öğrenciye uygulanması ve sonuçların “Classification Trees” yöntemine göre dallandırılarak 23 yapraklı bir ağaç haline getirilmesi ile oluşturulmuştur. Hazırlanan ve adına, Kaygı Ağacı denen ölçek, kimya dersine yönelik mevcut kaygıların belirlenmesinde ve kimyaya eğilimin ölçülmesinde; Kimya öğretmenleri içinse, performans ölçücü özellik taşıması açısından önerilen bir yönlendirme aracıdır.

Kimya Dersine Yönelik Kaygı Ölçeği Geliştirilmesi Kaygı Ağacı Oluşturma

This study has been carried out to develop a tool to measure the level of anxiety of students studying in the 10th and 11th grades of high schools in Turkey. The scale has been created by the application of a pool of items consisting of 45 sentences based on student opinions and expert advice to 365 students and the branching of the results with the "Classification Trees" method to prepare a tree of 23 leaves. The prepared scale is called the Anxiety Tree and is a suggested guidance tool to identify existing anxieties about chemistry for chemistry teachers. It has features to be used as a tool to measure performance.

___

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Allport, G.W. ( 1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In handbook of social psychology, G. Lindsey (Ed.). Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley,.
  • Anderson, R. D. and et al. (1970). Developing childeren's thinking trough science. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall.
  • Anderson, L.W. (1988). Attitude measurement: attitudes and their measurement. In Keeves, J.P.(Ed).
  • Balci, A., (1995). Research, method, concepts, and principles in social sciences. Ankara.
  • Baltas, A. (1999). Üstün başarı (6th ed.). Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Betz, N.E. (1978). Prevalence distrubution and correlates of math. Anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25(5), 441-448.
  • Bloom, B. S., (1979). Human characteristics and school learning. (Trans. D.A. Ozcelik). Ankara: Ministry of national Education Publishing.
  • Breiman, L., Freidman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth.
  • Brosnan, M.J., (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 223-234.
  • Buyukozturk, Ş., (1996). Research education in turkish higher education. A.U Social Sciences Institute, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis.
  • Buyukozturk, Ş., (1997). Development of research oriented anxiety scale. Educational Management inTheory and Practice, 3(4), 453- 464.
  • Ceyhan, E ve Namlu, A. (2000). Computer anxiety scale (CAS): validity and dependability study, A.U. Education Faculty Journal, 10(2), 77-93.
  • Ceyhan, E (2004). Stress coping behaviours of candidate teachers with different anxiety levels, Education and Science,132(29), 15-24.
  • Chua, S. L., Chen, D.T.& Wong, F.L.(1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta- analysis, Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 609-623.
  • Eltinge, E, M. & Roberts, C,W., (1993). Linguistic content analysis: a method to measure science as inquiry in textbooks,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 65-83.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I., (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, M.A: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fontana, D. (1985). Classroom control, British Psychological Society, London.
  • Hakkinen (1994). Changes in computer anxiety in a required computer course, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(2), 141-154.
  • Herron, M.D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry, School-Review, 79(2),171-212.
  • Hurd, P.D., Bybee, R.W., Kahle, J.B., & Yager, R.E. (1980). Biology education in secondary schools of the United States,The American Biology Teacher, 42(7), 388-404, 409-410.
  • Izard, C. E. & Tomkins, S. S., (1971). Affect and behavior anxiety as a negative affect. anxiety and behavior (third ed.) Edit. (81-125).C. D. Spielberger. New York: Academic Press Inc.
  • Kerlinger, F. N., (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. (second ed.) London: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
  • Kiesler, C., Collins, B., & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude change. A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York:Wiley.
  • Klausmeier, CH. J., & Goodwin, W., (1971). Learning and human abilities: educational psychology (fourthed.). New York:Harper and Row Publishers.
  • Koklu, N., (1996). Statistical anxiety scale, psychometric data, Education and Science, 20(102), 45-49.
  • Likert, R.A. (1932). Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
  • Mikkelsen, A., Ogaard, T., Lindoe, P.H. & Olsen, O.E. (2002). Job charateristics and computer anxiety in the production industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 223-239.
  • Osborne & Wittrock, (1983). Science teaching, Science Education, 67(4). 489-518.
  • Oner, N., & A. Le Comte (1983). Situational-continuous anxiety inventory hand book. Istanbul: Bogazici University Publication.
  • Rao, C.R., (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: Wiley.
  • Rao, C.D., (1965). Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York: Wiley.
  • Reece, M.J., & Gable, R.K.(1982). The development and validation of a measure of general attitudes toward computers.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 913-915.
  • Richardson, F.C. & Suinn, R. M., (1972). The mathematic anxiety rating scale: psychometric data, Journal of Counselling Psychology, 19(6), 551-54.
  • Ripley, B.D. (1981). Special statistics. New York: Wiley.
  • Ripley, B. D. (1996). Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
  • Roy, J., (1958). Step-down procedure in multivariate analysis, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29,1177-1187.
  • Roy, J., (1967). Some aspects of multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
  • Selim, M.A., & Shrigley, R.L.(1983). The group dynamics approach: A socio-psychological approach for testing the effect of discovery and expository teaching on science achievement and attitude of young, Egyptian students. J. Res.Sci.Teach, 20,213-224.
  • Spielberg, C. D., (1971). Theory and research on anxiety. Anxiety and behavior (third ed.) Edit. C. D. Spielberg. New York:Academic Press Inc.
  • Spielberg, C. D., (1972). Anxiety: current trend in theory and research. New York: Academic Press.
  • Tamir, P., (1983). Inquiry and the science teacher, Science Education, 67(5), 657-672.
  • Tamir,P., (1985). Content analysis focusing on inquiry, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 87-94.
  • Turgut, F., (1977). Measurement and Evaluation Methods in Education. (Fifth Edition), Ankara.