___

• Amir, A., & Musk, N. (2013) Language policing: micro-level language policy-in-process in the foreign language classroom, Classroom Discourse, 4(2), 151-167, DOI: 10.1080/19463014.2013.783500
• aus der Wieschen, M. V. (2017). Classroom Practices in Early Foreign Language Teaching in Denmark: On the Role of Quantity and Quality of Exposure to English inside the Classroom. PhD Thesis: University of Southern Denmark.
• aus der Wieschen, M. V., & Eskildsen, S. W. (forthc.). Embodied and occasioned learnables and teachables in an early EFL classroom. In H. Nguyen & T. Malabarba (Eds.), Conversation Analytic Perspectives on English Language Learning and Teaching in Global Contexts: Constraints and Possibilities. Multilingual Matters.
• aus der Wieschen, M. V., & Sert, O. (2018). Divergent language choices and maintenance of intersubjectivity: the case of Danish EFL young learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2018.1447544
• Balaman, U. (2016). A Conversation Analytic Study on the Development of Interactional Competence in English in an Online Task-Oriented Environment. PhD Thesis: Hacettepe University.
• Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box - raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King’s College London.
• Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
• Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S. W. (2017). The younger, the better?: a usage-based approach to learning and teaching of English in Danish primary schools. European Journal for Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1515/eujal-2017-0018
• Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut. (2011). Undervisningsdifferentiering som bærende pædagogisk princip: en evaluering af sammenhænge mellem evalueringsfaglighed og differentieret undervisning. Copenhagen: EVA. Retrieved from https://www.eva.dk/projekter/2010/undervisningsdifferentiering-ifolkeskolen/projektprodukter/undervisningsdifferentiering-som-baerende-paedagogisk-princip/download
• Dobson, S. & Engh, R. (2010). Vurdering for læring i fag. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.
• Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In I. Marková and K. Foppa (Eds.) Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, D. M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Pearson Assessments.
• Duschl, R. A. & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changes the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37–73.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
• Enever, J. (ed.) (2011). ELLiE. Early language learning in Europe. London: British Council.
• Eskildsen, S. W. and Wagner, J. (2013). Recurring and shared gestures in the L2 classroom: Resources for teaching and learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(1), 139–161.
• Evnitskaya, N. & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. doi:10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062
• Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Bakeman, R. (2017). Exploring the utility of sequential analysis in studying informal formative assessment practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 36(1), 28–38. doi:10.1111/emip.12143
• Hall, J. K. (1997). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: the construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education, 9(3), 287–311.
• Hannibal Jensen, S. (2017). Gaming as an English language learning resource among young children in Denmark. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 1–19.
• Hannibal Jensen, S. (forthc.). Extramural English engagement in a Danish context: a young learner perspective. (PhD Thesis, University of Southern Denmark).
• Heller, V. (2017). Managing knowledge claims in classroom discourse: the public construction of a homogeneous epistemic status. Classroom Discourse, 8(2), 156– 174.
• Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32(1), 79–104.
• Hellermann, J. & Harris, K. (2015). Navigating the language-learning classroom with-out previous schooling: a case study of li. In D. A. Koike & C. S. Blyth (Eds.), Dialogue in multilingual and multimodal communities (pp. 49– 77). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Helmke, A. (2013). Undervisningskvalitet og lærerprofessionalitet: diagnosticering, evaluering og udvikling af undervisning. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
• Heritage, M. (2013). Gathering evidence of student understanding. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 179–195). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Heritage, M. & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: the epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 176–190.
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In. G. Lerner (Ed.) Conversation analysis, studies form first generation (pp.13-34). John Benjamins.
• Koole, T. (2007). Parallel activities in the classroom. Language and Education, 21(6), 487–501.
• Koole, T. (2012). Teacher evaluations: assessing ‘knowing’, ‘understanding’ and ‘doing’. In G. Rasmussen, C. E. Brouwer, & D. Day (Eds.), Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction (pp. 43–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Koole, T. & Elbers, E. (2014). Responsiveness in teacher explanations: a conversation analytical perspective on scaffolding. Linguistics and Education, 26, 57–69. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.02.001
• Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3503_2
• Kousholt, K. (2015). Evaluering for læring. In J. Rasmussen, C. Holm, & A. Rasch-Christensen (Eds.), Folkeskolen - efter reformen (pp. 133–165). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
• Li, H. (2013). Student initiatives and missed learning opportunities in an IRF sequence: a single case analysis. L2 Journal, 5(2).
• Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan’s learning lessons reconsidered: on the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 239–280.. doi:Doi10.3102/00028312040001239
• Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in society, 33(5), 703–736.
• Mehan, H. (1979). ”what time is it, denise?”: asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.
• EMU – “Ministry for Children, Education and Gender Equality”. (2016). Fælles mål for faget engelsk. Web Page. EMU Danmarks læringsportal. Retrieved from http://www.emu.dk/sites/default/files/Engelsk%20%20januar%202016.pdf
• Mortensen, K. (2008a). Instructions and Participation in the Second Language Classroom. University of Southern Denmark. Det Humanistiske Fakultet. Mortensen, K. (2008b). Selecting next speaker in the second language classroom: how to find a willing next speaker in planned activities. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55–79.
• Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491-515. DOI: 10.1080/01638530902959463
• Rasmussen, J. (2015). Fokeskolereform 2014. In J. Rasmussen, C. Holm, & A. Rasch-Christensen (Eds.), Folkeskolen - efter reformen. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
• Rasmussen, J. & Rasch-Christensen, A. (2015). Målstyring: nye fælles mål. In J. Rasmussen, C. Holm, & A. RaschChristensen (Eds.), Folkeskolen - efter reformen (Chap. 6, pp. 113–132). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: the role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37 (1), 15–24.
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3), 237–263.
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A. & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. doi:10.1002/tea.20163
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
• Sahlström, J. F. (2002). The Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom Interaction. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47-57.
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 361-382.
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The international architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Blackwell Publishing.
• Sert, O. (2011). A micro-analytic investigation of claims of insufficient knowledge in EAL classrooms. PhD Thesis: Newcastle University.
• Sert, O. (2013a). ‘Epistemic status check’ as an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(1), 13–28.
• Sert, O. (2013b). (Un)willingness to participate as participants’ concern: reconsidering research on motivation in Applied Linguistics. American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference 2013. 16-19 March, 2013. Dallas, USA
• Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Social Interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Sert, O. & Balaman, U. (2018). Orientations to negotiated language and task rules in online L2 interaction. ReCALL, 1- 20.
• Sert, O. & Jacknick, C. M. (2015). Student smiles and the negotiation of epistemics in L2 classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 97–112.
• Sert, O. & Walsh, S. (2013). The interactional management of claims of insufficient knowledge in English language classrooms. Language and Education, 27(6), 542– 565.
• Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
• Slemmen, T. (2012). Vurdering for læring i klasserummet. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
• Solem, M. S. (2016a). Displaying knowledge through interrogatives in student-initiated sequences. Classroom Discourse, 7(1), 18–35.
• Solem, M. S. (2016b). Negotiating knowledge claims: students’ assertions in classroom interactions. Discourse Studies, 18(6), 737–757.
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: responding to the needs of all learners (2nd). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
• Tomlinson, C. A. & Moon, T. R. (2013a). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
• Tomlinson, C. A. & Moon, T. R. (2013b). Differentiation and classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 414–430). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Üstünel, E. & Seedhouse, P. (2005). Why that, in that language, right now? Code-switching and pedagogical focus. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 302–325.
• UVM – The Danish Ministry of Education. (2017a). About the folkeskole. Retrieved from http://eng.uvm.dk/primaryand-lower-secondary-education/the-folkeskole/about-the-folkeskole
• UVM – The Danish Ministry of Education. (2017b). Private schools. Web Page. Retrieved from http://eng.uvm.dk/- /media/filer/uvm/english/pdf/fact-sheets/101221-private-schools.pdf
• UVM – The Danish Ministry of Education. (2017c). LBK nr 989: Bekendtgørelse af lov om folkeskolen. Lovtidende A. Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
• Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577–594. doi:DOI10.1111/j. 1540-4781.2008.00788.x
• Waring, H. Z. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(2) 201–21.