Doing Exploratory Talk in the Language Classroom: A Sequential Account

: Building on William Barnes’ research (1992; 2008; 2010) on how exploratory talk can be used as a toolto work on understanding and promote learning in L1 elementary school classrooms, I examine exploratory talk in theadult ESL classroom. Ten hours of two adult ESL classes were videotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using aconversation analytic (CA) framework. The analysis shows that exploratory talk is implemented through a 5-stagesequential structure and can be teacher- or jointly-led. Each stage in the sequence is introduced, supported, andmanaged as much by gestures, gaze, and movement as by talk and silence. The findings not only suggest thatexploratory talk offers an important resource for resolving language issues but also how this can be done step-by-stepin real time. The findings contribute to previous research on exploratory talk by locating this talk within largerexploratory sequences, calling attention to crucial nonverbal conduct, and examining these sequences in the adult ESLclassroom.

___

  • Barnes, D. (1976/1992). From communication to curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann.
  • Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 1-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Barnes, D. (2010). Why talk is important. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 9(2), 7-10.
  • Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Torbe, M. (1969/1990). Language, the learner and the school. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
  • Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Dawes, L., Mercer, C., & Wegerif, R. (2000). Thinking together: A program of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8-11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds, Ltd.
  • Fagan, D. S. (2012). ‘Dealing with’ unexpected learner contributions in whole group activities: An examination of novice language teacher discursive practices, Classroom Discourse, 3(2), 107-128.
  • Fagan, D. S. (2014). Beyond “excellent”: Uncovering the systematicity behind positive feedback turn construction in ESL classrooms. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 8(1), 45-63.
  • Fagan, D. S. (2015). Managing language errors in real-time: A microanalysis of teacher practices. System, 55, 74 -85. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.09.004.
  • Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001). Reconceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 40-55.
  • Hall, J.K. & Smotrova, T. (2013). Teacher self-talk: Interactional resource for managing instruction and eliciting empathy. Journal of Pragmatics, 47, 75-92.
  • Jarvis, J. & Robinson, M. (2007). Analysing education discourse: An exploratory study of teacher response and support to pupils’ learning. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 212-228.
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). A sketch on some orderliness of overlap onset. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 43-59). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  • Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22-63.
  • Koole, T. (2010). Displays of epistemic access: Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2), 183-209.
  • Lee, Y-A. (2007). Third-turn position in teacher talk: contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 180-206.
  • Lee, Y-A. (2008). Yes-no questions in the third-turn position: Pedagogical discourse processes. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 237-262.
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Markee, N. (1995). Teachers’ answers to students’ questions: Problematizing the issue of making meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 63-92.
  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon, UK: Mulitlingual Matters.
  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Mercer, N. & Wegerif, R. (1999). Is exploratory talk productive talk? In P. Littleton & K. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp.79-115). Florence, KY: Routledge
  • Rojas-Drummond, S. (2000). Guided participation, discourse and the construction of knowledge in Mexican classroom. In H. Cowie, & G. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction (pp. 193-213). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Rojas-Drummond, S. & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1-2), 99-111.
  • Rojas-Drummond, S., Perez, V., Velez, M., Gomez, L., & Mendoza, A. (2003). Talking for reasoning among Mexican primary school children. Learning and Instruction, 13(6), 653–670.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge-base and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  • Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the classroom: IRF, feedback and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577-594.
  • Waring, H. Z. (2011). Learner initiatives and learner opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(2), 201-218.
  • Waring, H.Z. (2014). Managing control and connection in an ESL classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 49(1), 52-74.
  • Waring, H.Z. (2015). Promoting self-discovery in the language classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53(1), 61-85.
  • Wegerif, R. Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. In R. Wegerif & P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Computers and talk in the primary classroom (pp. 49-65). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (2000). Language for thinking: A study of children solving reasoning test problems together. In H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction (pp. 179-192). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Wegerif, R., Perez, J., Rojas-Drummond, S., Mercer, N., & Velez, M. (1999). Thinking together in the U.K. andMexico: Transfer of an educational innovation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 40-48.
  • Wells, G. & Ball, T. (2008). Exploratory talk and dialogic inquiry. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes (pp. 167-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wells, G. & Mejía-Arauz, R. (2006). Dialog in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379-428.