Christine JACKNICK, Sarah C CREIDER

A Chorus Line: Engaging (or Not) with the Open Floor

Turn-taking in classrooms has long been a topic of interest to discourse analysts, with attention paid to turn allocation in teacher-fronted settings (McHoul, 1978; Mehan, 1979), and recent research identifying teacher practices for managing "competing voices" (Waring, 2013). This study builds on such work, asking how students engage with an open floor in "materials mode" (Walsh, 2006, 2011), where teacher and students are focused on a written text and students respond in apparent chorus. We are interested in looking at students who actively bid for turns as well as those who do not contribute verbally. Based on videotaped data from an English as a Second Language (ESL) classroom and from a college reading class (both in the United States), this multimodal conversation analytic study (Mondada, 2016) identifies relevant interactional resources and practices, including talk, gaze, body position, gesture, and the physical environment. Findings suggest that 1) these apparently mundane interactions are a site for complex actions on the parts of individual students, and 2) the focus on text materials in these exchanges has consequences for participation, including temporality, sequentiality, and turn-taking. Pedagogical implications include problemetizing motivations and objectives for a common classroom ritual

PDF

___

Box, C. D. (2011). Embodied (non)participation in a tutoring session. Special Issue of Language and Information Society, 16. 79–108.
Brown, H.D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by Principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. 4th Edition. Pearson Education.
Creider, S. (2016). Encouraging student participation in a French-immersion kindergarten class: A multimodal, conversation analytic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Drew, P. (2013). Turn design. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 131-149). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dobs, A. (2014). Collective translation: An interaction practice of translating together in a Chinese foreign language class. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Language and Social Interaction (LANSI) Working Group, New York, NY.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C. (1999). Participation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1-2), 177-180.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489– 1522.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53-73.
Gourlay, L. (2005). OK, who's got number one? Permeable triadic dialogue, covert participation and the co-construction of checking episodes. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 403-422.
Hall, J. K. (2009). Interaction as method and result of language learning. Language Learning, 43(2). 202-215.
Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jacknick, C. (2009). A conversation analytic account of student-initiated participation in an ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D'Urso and P. Leonardi (Eds.) Discoure analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11-38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277-309.
Lerner, G. (2002). Turn-sharing. In C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox, & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macbeth, D. (2011). Understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 438-451. Matarese, M. & Caswell, D. (2017a). Neoliberal talk: The routinized structures of document-focused social worker-client discourse. In S.F. Schram & M. Pavlovskaya (Eds.), Rethinking neoliberalism: Resisting the disciplinary regime (pp. 2-20). New York: Routledge.
Matarese, M. & Caswell, D. (2017b). ‘I’m gonna ask you about yourself, so I can put it on paper’: Analysing street level bureaucracy through form-related talk in social work. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx041. Published: 14 August 2017
McHoul, A.W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213.
McHoul, A. (1985). Two aspects of classroom interaction: Turn-taking and correction. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13, 53–64.
Mehan, D. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mikkola, P. & Lehtinen, E. (2014). Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interaction with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 57-78). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mondada, L. (2001/2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. [Available online at: https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf] Retrieved on July 10, 2016.
Mondada, L. (2013). Displaying, contesting, and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597-626.
Mondada, L. (2016). Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction. In A. Rocci & L. deSaussure (Eds.), Verbal communication (pp. 329-350). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mondada, L. & Svinhufvud, K. (2016). Writing-in-interaction: Studying writing as a multimodal phenomenon in social interaction. Language and Dialogue, 6(1), 1-53.
Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M. (2014). On the interactional ecology of objects. In M.
Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interaction with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp. 3-30). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Sahlström, J.F. (2002). The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 47-57.
Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schwab, G. (2011). From dialogue to multilogue: A different view on particpiation in the English foreign-language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 3-19.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Blackwell, London.
Sinclair, J.M. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Tolins, J. (2013). Assessment and direction through nonlexical vocalizations in music instruction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(1), 47–64.
van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second language classroom research. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.
van Lier, L. (2002). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 140–164). New York: Continuum.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investingating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. New York: Routledge.
Waring, H.Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577-594.
Waring, H.Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (initiation–response–feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59, 796–824.
Waring, H.Z. (2013). Managing competing voices in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes, 50(5), 316-338.
Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
Wells, G. (2000). Modes of meaning in a science activity. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 307–334.