Benevolent Leadership and Interpersonal Deviant Behaviors in Higher Education

Bu çalışmanın amacı yükseköğretimde yardımsever liderlik ve kişilerarası sapkınlık arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sermaye ve psikolojik sahiplik kavramlarının aracılık rollerini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın örneklemini İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Adana, Bursa, Samsun, Kayseri, Erzurum ve Gaziantep'te tesadüfi küme örneklemesi yöntemi ile seçilmiş olan 13 üniversitedeki 1190 öğretim üyesi ve onların 78 bölüm başkanı oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma 9 Ocak- 24 Şubat 2017 tarihleri arasında tamamlanmıştır. Öğretim üyelerinin psikolojik sermaye, psikolojik sahiplik ve yardımsever liderlik algılamaları sırasıyla Luthans, Youssef ve Avolio (2007) tarafından geliştirilen "Psikolojik Sermaye Ölçeği", Avey, Avolio, Crossley ve Luthan (2008) tarafından geliştirilen "Psikolojik Sahiplik Ölçeği" ve Cheng, Chou ve Farh'ın (2000) "Yardımsever Liderlik Ölçeği" kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Bölüm başkanlarının kişilerarası sapkınlık algılamalarını değerlendirmek için Bennett ve Robinson'un (2000) "Kişilerarası Sapkınlık Ölçeği" kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar yardımsever liderlik ile kişilerarası sapkınlık davranışı arasında olumsuz ve önemli bir ilişki ve bu ilişkide psikolojik sermaye ve psikolojik sahiplik kavramların tam aracılık rolleri bulunduğunu göstermiştir

Yükseköğretimde Yardımsever Liderlik ve Kişilerarası Sapkın Davranışlar

This study examines the relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and the mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship in higher education. The study sample included 1190 faculty members along with their 78 department chairs in 13 universities selected by the cluster random-sampling method in İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Antalya, Adana, Bursa, Samsun, Kayseri, Erzurum and Gaziantep. It was completed in 9 January – 24 February 2017. Faculty member’s perceptions of psychological capital, psychological ownership and benevolent leadership were measured using “the Psychological Capital Questionnaire” developed by Luthans, Youssef, & Avolio (2007), “the Psychological Ownership Scale” developed by Avey, Avolio, Crossley, & Luthans (2008) and Cheng, Chou, & Farh’s (2000) “Benevolent Leadership Scale” respectively. Bennett and Robinson’s (2000) “Interpersonal Deviance Scale” was used to assess department chair’s perception of the interpersonal deviance. Results revealed a significant negative relationship between benevolent leadership and interpersonal deviance and fully mediating effects of psychological capital and psychological ownership on that relationship

PDF

___

Avey, J., Luthans, F., & Jensen, S. (2009). Psychological capital: a positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48, 677–693.
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. R., & Luthans, F. (2008). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions and analysis of a multi-dimensional theory-based measure. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 30, 173-191.
Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the Process of Ethical Leadership: The Mediating Role of Employee Voice and Psychological Ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach to representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173– 1182.
Basik, K. (2010). Expanding the boundaries of behavioral integrity in organizations. (Dissertation thesis), Florida State University, Talllahassee, FL.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003). The Past, Present and Future of Workplace Deviance Research. In J.
Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science (pp. 247–281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Academic Press.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632.
Caldwell, C., & Hayes, L. A. (2007). Leadership, trustworthiness, and the mediating lens. Journal of Management Development, 26(3), 261-281.
Cetin, F., & Basim, H. N. (2012). Örgütsel Psikolojik Sermaye: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması. Amme İdare Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137.
Chang, S. J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 178–184.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14, 3–64.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd . ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Interactive Effects of Personality and Perceptions of the Work Situation on Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 599–609.
Cole, N. D., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Effects of training in procedural justice perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 699–705.
Cullen, M. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Personality and counterproductive workplace behavior. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work (pp. 150–182). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Deng, Z. H., & Chen, W. Z. (2013). Empirical Research on the Effects of Paternalistic Leadership on Employee's Work Attitude and Behavior: Job Satisfaction as a Mediating Variable. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 1, 6-15.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.
Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, V. Bian & L. Cheng (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230–260). New York: Sharpe.
Ferguson, M., & Barry, B. (2011). I know what you did: The effects of interpersonal deviance on bystanders. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 80-94.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumba, F. O. (2005). Can you see the real me? A selfbased model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343 – 372.
Gilliland, S. E. (1993). The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 694-734.
Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multifoci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24-44.
Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader– member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170–178.
Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2008). Responding destructively in leadership situations: The role of personal values and problem construction. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 251-272.
Iyigun, N.O. & Cetin, C. (2012). Psikolojik kontratın örgütsel sapma üzerindeki etkisi: ilaç sektöründe bir araştırma. Öneri Dergisi, 10 (37), 15-29.
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.
Judge, T. A., Scott, B. A., & Ilies, R. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 126-138.
Karakas, F. (2009). Benevolent leadership. McGill University, Montreal.
Karakas, F., & Sarigollu, E. (2011). Benevolent leadership: conceptualization and construct development. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 537–553.
Karakas, F., Sarigollu, E., & Manisaligil, A. (2013). The use of benevolent leadership development to advance principles of responsible management education. Journal of Management Development, 32(8), 801 - 822.
Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32, 500–528.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.
Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 107-123.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). San Francisco: BarrettKoehler.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, D. A. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 141– 160). Mahwah, NJ: Erblaum.
Masten, A. S., & Reed, M. (2002). Resilience in development. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74–88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874−888.
Niu, C. P., Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2009). Effectiveness of a moral and benevolent leader: Probing the interactions of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 32-39.
Norman, S. M., Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L., & Pigeon, N. G. (2010). The Interactive Effects of Psychological Capital and Organizational Identity on Employee Organizational Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(4), 380–391.
Okten, A. B., & Cenkci, T. (2012). The impact of paternalistic leadership on ethical climate: The moderating role of trust in leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 525–536.
O’Reilly, C. E. (2002). The wrong kind of ownership. Across the Board, 1, 19–20.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44–55.
Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2010). The cost of bad behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 39, 64-71.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.
Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive Behaviors at Work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K.
Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–164). London: Sage.
Salancik, G., R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–259.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434 – 443.
Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249-276.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management Development, 33, 261–289.
Terre-Blanche, M., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.
Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Wittek, R. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 250-258.
Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 79-92. The Council of Higher Education. (2017). Universitelerimiz. from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/yuksekogretimIstatistikleri/2016/2016_T107v2.pdf
Vartia, M. A. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 63, 63-69.
Wang, A., & Cheng, B. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 106-121.