Assisting the Client in Aphasia Speech Therapy: A Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Cueing Practices

This paper investigates aphasia speech therapy as a particular form of institutional interaction dedicated to the recovery of language and communicative abilities in adult speakers. This specific form of social interaction involves both health and pedagogical issues, by presenting features generally observed in instructional settings. The paper investigates these features by focusing on the interactional and sequential organisation of naming activity – that is, the activity of naming a card. Through detailed analyses of participants’ multimodal conduct, it is shown that this task (e.g. producing a specific linguistic item) is collaboratively accomplished. This defends a conception of the therapy as a socially situated and collaborative process, whose dynamics must be investigated taking into consideration participants’ multimodal resources. By focusing in particular on the cueing practices used by the therapist in order to assist the client’s word retrieval and production of the target item, the paper shows that these practices are strictly dependent on the micro-details of interaction, on the client’s audible and visible conduct, and as such are incrementally and locally occasioned. It therefore highlights the active role played by the client in negotiating the assistance needed by the therapist and, more broadly, in co-constructing the therapeutic process

PDF

___

Abel, S., Schultz, A., Radermacher, I., Willmes, K., Huber, W. (2005). Decreasing and increasing cues in naming therapy for aphasia. Aphasiology, 19(9), 831-848.
Antaki, C., Crompton, R. J., Walton, C. & Finlay, W. M. L. (2017). How adults with a profound intellectual disability engage others in interaction. Sociology of Health and Illness. Retrieved October 2016 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12500/full.
Antaki, C. & Kent, A. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 876-889.
Boone, D. R., & Prescott, T. E. (1972). Content and sequence analyses of speech and hearing therapy. ASHA, 14, 58- 62.
Brookshire, R. H. (1973). An introduction to aphasia. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
Brookshire, R. H. (1976). A system for coding and recording events in patient-clinician intersections during aphasia treatment sessions. In R. H. Brookshire, H. Robert (Eds.), Proceedings of the Clinical Aphasiology Conference (Wemme, OR : May 18-21, 1976). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.
Brookshire, R. H. (1992). An introduction to neurogenic communication disorders. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.
Brookshire, R. H., Krueger, K., Nicholas, L. & Cicciarelli, A. (1977). Analysis of clinician-patient interactions in aphasia treatment. In Brookshire, R. H. (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings (Amelia Island, FL: May 17-20, 1977) (pp. 181-187). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers..
Brouwer, C. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Ed.), Second language conversations (pp. 93-113). London: Continuum.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2004). Commentaries: Reflections on speech-language therapists’ talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39 (4), 477-480.
Davis, A. (1993). A survey of adult aphasia and related language disorders. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Davis, A., Pring, T. (1991). Therapy for word-finding deficits: More on the effects of semantic and phonological approaches to treatment with dysphasic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 235-245.
Doesborgh, S., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M., Dippel, D., van Harskamp, F., Koudstaal, P., Visch-Brink, E. (2004). Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 35, 141-146.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Duffy, J. (1994). Schuell’s stimulation approach to rehabilitation. In R., Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd edition, pp. 146-174). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Ferguson, A. J. (1999). Learning in aphasia therapy: It’s not so much what you do, but how you do it!, Aphasiology, 1999, 13(2), 125-150.
Ferguson, A. J., Armstrong, E. M. (2004). Reflections on speech-language therapists’ talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39(4), 469-507.
Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Searching for a word as an interactive activity. In J. N. Deely & M. D. Lenhart (Eds.), Semiotics (pp. 129-138). New York: Plenum.
Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-Constructing Meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 233-260.
Goodwin, C. (2000a). Gesture, aphasia, and interaction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 84-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. (2000b). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (10), 1489-1522.
Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: the social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151-170.
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986): Gestures and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51-75.
Hickin, J., Best, W., Herbert, R., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2002). Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 16, 981-999.
Hillis, A. E., Caramazza, A. (1994). Theories of lexical processing and rehabilitation of lexical deficits. In M. J. Riddoch & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 449-484). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
Horton, S. (2006). A framework for the description and analysis of therapy for language impairment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 20(6), 528-564.
Horton, S. (2008). Learning in interaction: Resourceful work by people with aphasia and therapists in the course of language impairment therapy. Aphasiology, 22(9), 985-1014.
Horton, S., & Byng S. (2000). Examining interaction in language therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(3), 355-375.
Howard, D. (2000). Cognitive Neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: The case of word retrieval. In I. Papathanasiou (Ed.), Acquired Neurogenic Communication Disorders: A clinical perspective. London: Whurr.
Howard, D., Patterson, K., Franklin, S., Orchard-Lisle, V., Morton, J. (1985). Treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. A comparison of two therapy methods. Brain, 108, 817-829.
Katz, R. (1994). Computer applications in aphasia treatment. In R., Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia (3rd edition). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Kidwell, M. (2013). Availability as a trouble source in directive-response sequences. In: Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond and Jack Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp. 234-260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klippi, A. (1990). Conversational dynamics between aphasics. Aphasiology, 5 (4), 373-378.
Klippi, A. (2015). Pointing as an embodied practice in aphasic interaction. Aphasiology, 29 (3), 337-354.
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: a pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 277-309.
Kovarsky, D. & Duchan, J.F. (1997). The interactional dimensions of language therapy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 297-307.
Laakso, M. (1992). The interaction in conversations of aphasic persons and speech therapists. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P.
Linell, B. Nordberg (Eds.), Text and Talk in Professional Contexts (pp. 237-256). Uppsala: The Swedish Association of Applied Linguistics.
Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation. Studia Fennica Linguistica 8. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Laakso, M. (2015). Collaborative participation in aphasic word searching: comparison between significant others and speech and language therapists. Aphasiology, 29(3), 269-290.
Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the “hint and guess”- sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13(4-5), 345-363.
Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111-131.
Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the "semi-permeable" character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff et S. A. Thompson (eds.). Interaction and Grammar (pp. 238-276), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, E. C., & Williams, S. E. (1989). The efficacy of two types of cues in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 3, 619- 626. Marlaire, C.L., & Maynard, D.W. (1990). Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 63(2), 83-101.
Marshall, J., Pound, C., White-Thomson, M., & Pring, T. (1990). The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 4(2), 167-184.
Maynard, D. W. (1991). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 448-495.
Maynard, D.W., & Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis, doctor–patient interaction and medical communication Medical Education, 39, 428–435.
McHoul, A. (1978). The organisation of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7(2), 183-213.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Merlino, S. (2017). Initiatives topicales du client aphasique au cours de séances de rééducation: pratiques interactionnelles et enjeux identitaires. In Keel S. & Mondada L. (Eds.). Participation et asymétrie dans l’interaction institutionnelle (pp. 53-94). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Merlino, S. (2014). Singing in “another” language: how pronunciation matters in the organisation of choral rehearsals. Social Semiotics, 24(4), 420–445.
Morton, J. (1979). Some experiments on facilitation in word and picture recognition and their relevance for the evolution of a theoretical position. In P. Kolers, M. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (pp. 259-268). Plenum: New York.
Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1979). An analysis of how clinicians respond to unacceptable patient responses in aphasia treatment sessions. In Clinical Aphasiology Conference: Clinical Aphasiology Conference (Phoenix, AZ : May 28-31, 1979), Minneapolis: BRK Publishers, 131-138.
Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935-979.
Parry, R. (2004). Communication during goal-setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(6), 668-682.
Pease, D. M., & Goodglass, H. (1978). The effects of cuing on picture naming in aphasia. Cortex, 14, 178-189.
Peräkylä A, Antaki C, Vehviläinen S, & Leudar I. (Eds.) (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Pilnick, A., Hindmarsh, J., & Teas Gill, V. (eds.) (2010). Communication in Healthcare Settings: Policy, Participation and New Technologies. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1993). On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 113-141.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organisation in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silvast, M. (1991). Aphasia Therapy Dialogues. Aphasiology, 5(4-5), 383-390.
Sinclair, J. M. H., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. S. (1999). Social role negotiation in aphasia therapy: Competence, incompetence and conflict. In D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan, M. Maxwell (Eds.), Constructing (in)competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction (pp. 313-342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Simmons-Mackie N., Damico J. S., & Damico H. L. (1999). A qualitative study of Feedback in Aphasia Treatment. American Journal of Speech – Language Pathology, 8(3), 218-230.
Ten Have, P. (1991). Talk and Institution: a reconsideration of the ‘asymmetry’ of doctor-patient interaction. In D. Boden, D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and Social Structure (pp. 128-163). Cambridge: Polity
Wambaugh, J. L. (2003). A comparison of the relative effects of phonologic and semantic cueing treatment. Aphasiology, 17, 433-441.
Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4/5), 327-343.
Wilkinson, R. (2004). Reflecting on talk in speech and language therapy: some contributions using conversation analysis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(4), 497-503.
Wilkinson, R. (2007). Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 542–569.
Wilkinson, R. (2011). Changing interactional behaviour: Using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied Conversation Analysis: Changing Institutional Practices (pp. 32-53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilkinson, R. (2013). The interactional organization of aphasia naming testing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(10-11), 805-822.
Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Lock, S., & Sage, K. (2010). Implementing and evaluating aphasia therapy targeted at couples’ conversations: A single case study. Aphasiology, 24(6), 869-886.