Language Between Instrument and Goal of Philosophy

Language Between Instrument and Goal of Philosophy

It is obviously that in the 20.th century there are not only differences, but also important similar aspects or common points between criticism philosophy and analytic philosophy. Analytic philosophy is primarily seen as a critical philosophy, and otherwise it has its source in the discoursing metaphysical criticism. The origin aim was the correction of critical philosophy on criticism base. The aim and final orientation of analytic philosophy was not to synthesis the eventual problems of philosophy at the speculation way, but in achieving terminal analyses to analysis and to solve thought problems. To reach at such a basic structure, surely it is at first aspect necessary to make clear the analytic steps one after one; and afterwards it has to build up this hypotheses on a properly ground. But for the right argumentation it is not only to resolve these negations, but also to distinguish between the scientific analytic philosophy and that which is related to the particular time and its conditions.

___

  • Krämer, Sybille, (2001), „Sprache, Sprechakt, Kommunikation –Sprachtheoretische Positionen des 20. Jahrhunderts“, Suhrkamp Verl, 1. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main.
  • Hacking, Ian, (1984), „Die Bedeutung der Sprache für die Philosophie“; Hain Verl., Königsstein/Ts.
  • Saydam, Oktay, (2006), Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Sprechakttheorie zur Analyse und Interpretation von literarischen Texten- am Beispiel der Werke von Bertolt Brecht, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi).
  • Schoch, Agnes, (1979), „Vorarbeiten zu einer pädagogischen Kommunikationstheorie“, Suhrkamp Verl., Frankfurt am Main.
  • Wiehl, Reiner, (1981), (Hrsg.): „Geschichte der Philosophie in Text und Darstellung 20. Jh.“, Bd. 8, Philipp Reclam Verl., Stuttgart.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, (1922), „Tractatus-Logico-Philosophicus“ (Übersetzung von Oruç Aruoba (1996) mit Originaltext im gleichen Band); YKY; Istanbul.