Türkiye’de kurumsal yönetim ve firma performansı (tobin-q ve anormal getiri) arasındaki ilişkinin analizi

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İMKB–100 endeksinde yer alan 51 firma için kurumsal yö netim ile firma performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi Panel Lojistik Regresyon Modelle ri (PLRM) kullanarak test etmektir. Analizler, 1998-2007 dönemini kapsayan 10 yıllık veri dikkate alınarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada CEO’nun aynı zaman da yönetim kurulu üyesi veya yönetim kurulu başkanı olmaması durumu, yöne tim kurulu üye sayısının büyüklüğü ve sahiplik yoğunlaşmasının Tobin-q değeri ni arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Yönetici sahipliğinin firma performansını arttırmada önemli bir değişken olmadığı, ancak yabancı sahipliğinin Tobin-q temelinde firma performansını arttırırken, hisse senedi getirilerini azalttığı belirlenmiştir. Firmalarda denetim komitesinin varlığının performansı arttıracağı beklentisi gerçekleşmemiştir.

The analysis of the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance (tobin-q and abnormal return) in Turkey

The purpose of this study is to test the relationship between corporate gover nance and firm performance for 51 firms listed in the ISE-100 index using Panel Logistic Regression Models (PLRM). The data cover a ten years period betwe en1998-2007. The case that CEO is neither also the chairman of the board of di rectors nor a board member, the size of board of directors and ownership con centration increase the value of Tobin-q. Nevertheless Managerial ownership is not found to be an important variable improving firm performance. Results from the panel logistic regression models indicate that while foreign ownership increases firm performance in terms of Tobin-q, it reduces abnormal stock returns of the firm. The expectation that the presence of audit committee would increase the performance in firms is not confirmed.

___

  • AKTAN, C. Can; (2006), Kurumsal Şirket Yönetimi, SPK, Yayın No: 196.
  • ANDERSON, Ronald C.; Sattar A. MANSI and Reeb DAVID M; (2004), “Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, and the Cost of Debt”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37 (3), pp.315-342.
  • AYDIN, Nurhan, Mustafa SAYIM ve Abdullah YALAMA; (2007), “Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Eco nomics, 11, pp.103-111.
  • BAEK, Jae-Seung; Jun-Koo KANG and Kyung Suh PARK; (2004), “Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Evidence from the Korean Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Econom ics,71(2), pp.265-313.
  • BEINER, Stefan; Wolfgang DROBETZ; Marcus M SCHMID and Zimmermann, HEINZ; (2006), “An Integrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation”, European Fi nancial Management, 12(2), pp.249-283.
  • BEN-AKIVA, Moshe and, R. Lerman STEVEN; (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, England.
  • BERLE, Adolf A. and Gardiner C. MEANS; (1932), the Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York.
  • BHAGAT, Sanjai and Brian BOLTON; (2008), “Corporate Gov ernance and Firm Performance”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), pp.257-273.
  • BIANCO, Magda and Paola CASAVOLA; (1999), “Italian Cor porate Governance: Effects on Financial Structure and Firm Performance”, European Economic Review, 43(4-6), pp.1057- 1069.
  • BLACK, Bernard S.; Hasung JANG and Woochan KIM; (2003), “Does Corporate Governance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from Korea”, Stanford Law School Working Paper, No: 237. http:// www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/finance/black.pdf, 11.09.2010.
  • BRUNER, Robert F.; Kenneth M. EADES; Robert S. HARRIS; Robert C. HIGGINS; (1998), “Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of Capital: Survey and Synthesis”, Financial Practice and Education, 8(1), pp.20-33.
  • CHAGANTI, Rajeswararao S.; Vijay MAHAJAN and Subhash SHARMA; (1985), “Corporate Board Size, Composition and Corporate Failures in Retailing Industry”, Journal of Manage ment Studies, 22(4), pp.400-417.
  • ÇITAK, Levent; (2007), “The Impact of Ownership Structure on Company Performance; A Panel Data Analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed Companies”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 9, ss.107-119.
  • DALTON, Dan R.; Catherine M. DAILY; Alan E. ELLSTRAND and Jonathan L. JOHNSON; (1998), “Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Per formance”, Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), pp.269-290.
  • DEMSETZ, Harold and Kenneth LEHN; (1985), “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), pp.1155-1177.
  • DEMSETZ, Harold and Belen VILLALONGA; (2001), “Owner ship Structure and Corporate Performance”, Journal of Corpo rate Finance, 7(3), pp. 209–233.
  • DROBETZ, Wolfgang; Andreas SCHILLHOFER and Heinz ZIMMERMANN; (2004), “Corporate Governance and Expect ed Stock Returns: Evidence from Germany”, European Finan cial Management, 10(2), pp.267-293.
  • DURUKAN, M. Banu; Serdar ÖZKAN and A. Fatih DALKILIÇ; (2009), “The Effectiveness of the Turkish Corporate Gover nance System: CEO Changes and Performance Measures”, SSRN Working Paper Series 1405251, http://ssrn.com/ab stract=1405251.
  • FAMA, Eugene F. and Michael C. JENSEN; (1983), “Agency Problems and Residual Claims”, Journal of Law and Econom ics, 26(2), pp. 327-349.
  • GOMPERS, Paul A.; Joy L. ISHII and Andrew METICK; (2003), “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (1), pp.107-155.
  • GÜRBÜZ, A. Osman ve Yakup ERGİNCAN; (2004), “Dünya da ve Türkiye’de Kurumsal Yönetim Düzeyinin ve Şirket Performanslarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, Geleneksel Finans Sempozyumu-2004, Marmara Ünv. BSYO, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • HIMMELBERG, Charles P.; R. Glenn HUBBARD and Darius PALIA; (1999), “Understanding the Determinants of Manage rial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Perfor mance”, Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), pp. 353-384.
  • HIRAKI, Takato; Hideaki INOUE; Akitoshi ITO; Fumiaki KU ROKI; Hiroyuki MASUDA; (2003), “Corporate Governance and Firm Value in Japan: Evidence from 1985 to 1998”, Pasific Basin Finance Journal, 11(3), pp.239-265.
  • HOSMER, David; W. Stanley LEMESHOW; (2000), Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition, Wiley Series in Probabil ity and Statistics, Canada.
  • JENSEN, Michael C.; (1993), “The Modern Industrial Revolu tion, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems”, The Journal of Finance, 48(3), pp.831-880.
  • JENSEN, Michael C. and William H. MECKLING; (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp.305-360.
  • JUDGE, William Q.; Irina NAOUMOVA and Nadejda KOUTZEVOL; (2003), “Corporate Governance and Firm Per formance in Russia: An Empirical Study”, Journal of World Business, 38(4), pp. 385-396.
  • KAUFFMAN, Robert J.; Trent J. SPAULDING and Charles A. WOOD; (2009), “Are Online Auction Markets Efficient? An Em pirical Study of Market Liquidity and Abnormal Returns”, Deci sion Support Systems, 48(1), pp.3-13.
  • KAYMAK, Turhan and Eralp BEKTAS; (2008), “East Meets West? Board Characteristics in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks”, Corporate Governance, 16(6), pp.550- 561.
  • KIEFER, Dean B.; (2004), “The Nonlinear Relationship be tween Insider Ownership and Firm Performance”, Journal of Accounting and Finance Research Summer II, pp.122-130.
  • KIM, Hyo Jin and Soon Suk YOON; (2007), “Corporate Gover nance and Firm Performance in Korea”, Malaysian Accounting Review, 6(2), pp.1-17.
  • KLAPPER, Leora F. and Inessa LOVE; (2004), “Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, and Performance in Emerg ing Markets”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), pp. 703-728.
  • KLEIN, April; (2002), “Audit Committee, Board of Director Char acteristics and, Earnings Management”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), pp. 375- 400.
  • KÜÇÜKÇOLAK, Ali and Levent ÖZER; (2007), “Do Corporate Governance, Independent Boards, and Auditors Affect Mar ket and Financial Performance? An Application to the Istanbul Stock Exchange”, Review of Business, 28(1), pp.18-31.
  • KULA, Veysel; (2005), “The Impact of the Roles, Structure and Process of Boards on Firm Performance: evidence from Tur key”, Corporate Governance, 13(2), pp.165-176.
  • KYEREBOAH-COLEMAN, Anthony and BIEKPE, Nicholas; (2006), “The Relationship between Board Size, Board Com position, CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Experience from Ghana”, Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2), pp.114-122.
  • KYEREBOAH-COLEMAN, Anthony; Charles K.D. ADJASI and Joshua ABOR; (2006), “Corporate Governance and Firm Per formance: Evidence From Ghanaian Listed Companies”, Cor porate Ownership & Control, 4(2), pp.123-132.
  • LEONE, Andrew J.; R. Lawrence Van, HORN and Gerard J. WEDING; (2005), “Abnormal Returns and the Regulation of Nonprofit Hospital Sales and Conversions”, Journal of Health Economics, 24(1), pp.113-135.
  • MAK, Y.T. and Yuanto KUSNADI; (2005), “Size Really Matters: Further Evidence on the Negative Relationship Between Board Size and Firm Value”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), pp.301-318.
  • MAURY, Benjamin; (2006), “Family Ownership and Firm Per formance: Empirical Evidence from Western European Corpo rations”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), pp.321-341.
  • MITTON, Todd; (2002), “A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), pp.215-241.
  • MOUSTAFA, M.A.; (2007), “Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: Evidence from Egypt”. CBE-7, The Seventh An nual U.A.E. University Research Conference.
  • ORBAY, Hakan and B. Burçin YURTOĞLU; (2006), “The Im pact of Corporate Governance Structures on the Corporate In vestment Performance in Turkey”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(4), pp.349-363.
  • PEARCE II, John A. and Shaker A. ZAHRA; (1992), “Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective”, Jour nal of Management Studies, 29(4), pp.411-438.
  • RAJA, J. and A. S. KUMAR; (2007), “SME Entrepreneurship, Firm Performance, and Corporate Governance Practices in In dian Service Firms”, Journal of Services Research, 7(2), pp.99- 113.
  • SANDA, Ahmadu; Aminu S. MIKAILU and Tukur GARBA; (2005), “Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Finan cial Performance in Nigeria”, AERC Research Paper No:149, Nairobi.
  • SHLEIFER, Andrei and Robert W. VISHNY; (1986), “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control”, The Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), pp.461-488.
  • SHLEIFER, Andrei and Robert W. VISHNY; (1997), “A Sur vey of Corporate Governance”, The Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp.737-783.
  • SPK (2005). Kurumsal Yönetim İlkeleri. Şubat 2005.
  • SRIDHARAN, Uma V. and Allan MARSINKO; (1997), “CEO Duality in the Paper and Forest Products Industry”, Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 10(1), pp.59-65.
  • TANRIÖVEN, Cihan; İlhan KÜÇÜKKAPLAN ve E. Savaş BAŞÇI; (2006), “Kurumsal Yönetim Açısından Sahiplik ve Kon trol Yapısı İle Üst Düzey Yönetici Durumunun İMKB’de Faaliyet Gösteren Bankalarda İncelenmesi”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 21(241), pp.87-104.
  • VARIŞ, Meral; Ali KÜÇÜKÇOLAK; Oral ERDOĞAN ve Levent ÖZER; (2001), “Sermaye Piyasalarında Kurumsal Yönetim İlkeleri”, İMKB Dergisi, Yıl: 5, Sayı; 19 (Özel Sayı), ss.129-168.
  • YERMACK, David Larry; (1996), “Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors”, Journal of Finan cial Economics, 40(2), pp.185-221.
  • YURTOĞLU, B. Burçin; (2000), “Ownership, Control and Per formance of Turkish Listed Firms”, Empirica, 27(2), pp.193-222.
  • ZHEKA, Vitaly (2006). Corporate Governance and Firm Per formance in Ukraine. CERT Discussion Papers, 2006/05, No: 605. http://www.sml.hw.ac.uk/cert Discussion Paper 2006/5.