Hisse senedi piyasası ve döviz kuru ilişkisinin eşbütünleşme analizi: yapısal kırılmaların önemi

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye hisse senetleri piyasası (İMKB-100) ile döviz kuru (ABD doları) arasındaki ilişkinin uzun dönem dinamiklerini ortaya koymaktır. Ça- lışmada 1988-2009 dönemi, haftalık kapanış verileri kullanılarak incelenmiştir.Uzun dönemli ilişkinin ortaya konulması için olası yapısal kırılmaları da gözönüne alan eşbütünleşme analizleri kullanılmıştır. Eşbütünleşme testleri yardımıyla zaman içinde ekonomik koşulların değişmesinden dolayı serilerde ortaya çıka- bilecek yapısal kırılmaların etkileri tespit edilebilmektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları- na göre, yapısal kırılmanın gözardı edildiği eşbütünleşme testleri uygulandığın- da hisse senetleri piyasası ile döviz kuru arasında uzun dönemli ilişki bulunama- maktadır. Fakat olası yapısal kırılmaların gözönünde bulundurulduğu eşbütün- leşme test sonuçlarına göre, hisse senetleri piyasası ile döviz kuru serilerinin eş- bütünleşik oldukları yani serilerin zaman içindeki hareketlerinin benzerlik gösterdiği görülmektedir. Çalışmanın bulguları yapısal kırılmaların zaman serileri üzerindeki etkilerini açıkça ortaya koymaktadır.

Cointegration analysis of the relationship between stock market and foreign exchange: ımportance of structural breaks

The objective of this study is to put forth the long-run dynamics of the relation between stock market (ISE-100) and exchange rate (the US dollar). The period between 1988-2009 was analysed by using weekly closing prices. Cointegration analysis with structural breaks are employed to show the long-run relation. The effects of structural breaks, which might occur due to changes in economic conditions, coud be detected by the help of cointegration tests. According to the results of the study, no relation was found between stock market and exchange rate when cointegration tests rulling out structural breaks are used. According to the results of the cointegration tests taking the possible structural breaks into account, however, it is seen that the series of stock market and exchange rate are cointegrated that is to say the movements of the series over time resemble. The findings of the study indicate the effects of prospective structural breaks on time series evidently.

___

  • BAILEY, W. and Y. P. CHUNG; (1995), “Exchange Rate Fluctu- ations, Political Risk, and Stock Returns: Some Evidence from an Emerging Market”, The Journal of Financial and Quantita- tive Analysis, 30(4), pp. 541-561.
  • CHOW, E.H.; W.Y. LEE and M.S SOLT; (1997), “The Exchange Rate Risk Exposure of Asset Returns”, Journal of Business, 70, pp. 105-123.
  • DICKEY, D.A. and W. Fuller; (1979), “Distribution of the Es- timators for Auto-Regressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, pp. 427-431.
  • DORNBUSCH, R. and S. FISHER; (1980), “Exchange Rates and the Current Account”, American Economic Review, 70, pp. 960-971.
  • ENGLE R. and C. GRANGER; (1987), “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econo- metrica, 35, pp. 251–276.
  • GRANGER, C.W.J. and P. NEWBOLD; (1974), “Spurious Re- gressions in Economics”, Journal of Econometrics, 4, pp. 111- 120.
  • GRANGER, C. W. J., B. HUANG and C. YANG (2000). A bi- variate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asian flu. The Quarterly Review of Eco- nomics and Finance. 40. 337–354.
  • GREGORY, A.W. and B.E. HANSEN; (1996), “Residual-based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts”, Journal of Econometrics, 70, pp. 99–126.
  • HATEMİ-J, A.; (2008), “Tests for Cointegration with two Un- known Regime Shifts with an Application to Financial Market Integration”, Empirical Economics, 35(3), pp. 497-505.
  • KIM, K.; (2003), “Dollar Exchange Rate and Stock Price: Evidence from Multivariate Cointegration and Error-correction Model” Review of Financial Economics, 12, pp. 301–313.
  • LUMSDAINE, R.L. and D.H. PAPELL; (1997), “Multiple Trend Breaks and The Unit Root Hypothesis”, The Review of Eco- nomics and Statistic, 79, pp. 212-218.
  • MACKINNON, J.G.; (1996), “Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, pp. 601-618.
  • MORLEY, B.; (2002). “Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: Im- plications for European Convergence”, Journal of Policy Mod- eling, 24(5), pp. 523-526.
  • MURADOGLU, G., K. METIN, and R. ARGAC; (2001), “Is there a long run relationship between stock returns and monetary variables: evidence from an emerging market”. Applied Finan- cial Economics, 11, pp. 641-649.
  • NELSON, C.R. and C.R. PLOSSER; (1982), “Trends and Ran- dom Walks in Macroeconmic Time Series : Some Evidence and Implications”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, pp. 139-162.
  • NIEH, Chien-Chung and Cheng-Few LEE; (2001), Dynamic Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates for G-7 Countries, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Fi- nance, 41, pp. 477–490.
  • PAN, M., R. C. FOK, and Y. A. LIU; (2007), “Dynamic Linkages between Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: Evidence from East Asian Markets”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 16, pp. 503-520.
  • PHILLIPS, P.; (1987), “Time Series Regression with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 55, pp. 277-301.
  • PHILLIPS, P.C.B. and P. PERRON; (1988), “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regressions", Biometrika, 75, pp. 335-346.
  • ROLL, R.; (1992), “Industrial Structure and the Comparative Behaviour of International Stock Market Indices”, Journal of Fi- nance, 47, pp. 3-41. YUCE, A. and C.
  • SIMGA-MUGAN; (1996), “An Investigation of the Short- and Long-term Relationships between Turkish Financial Markets”, The European Journal of Finance, 2, pp. 305-317.
  • ZIVOT, E. and D.W.K. ANDREWS; (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hy- pothesis”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, pp. 251-270.