Preservice Teachers' Intercultural Competence: A Comparative Study of Teachers in Switzerland and Turkey

Preservice Teachers' Intercultural Competence: A Comparative Study of Teachers in Switzerland and Turkey

Problem Statement: Every society consists of individuals different in termsof physical, psychological, and sociocultural characteristics.Differentiation in today’s societies has increased due to globalization,intensified immigration, advancements in communication technologies,and the recent increase in value of subcultures within the dominantculture. Consequently, human communities that maintain differentcharacteristics together have brought about the concept of multiculturalsocieties. Within these societies, teachers play the principle role inmaintaining the multicultural environment and managing its processes.Since teachers’ successful implementation of these tasks depends on theirlevel of intercultural competence, today’s teachers should develop theirintercultural competence.Purpose of Study: The present study aims to determine the interculturalcompetence levels of preservice teachers from Switzerland and Turkey.Methods: A descriptive survey model was used as the chief researchapproach. The study sample comprised 185 preservice teachers, 84 ofwhom were from Switzerland and 101 of whom were from Turkey. Datawere collected by means of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaireand a personal information form.Findings and Results: The intercultural competence levels of preserviceteachers from Switzerland and Turkey were found to be middling.Preservice teachers perceived themselves to be the most competent in thedimension of ‘cultural empathy,’ which was followed by ‘openmindedness,’‘social initiative,’ ‘flexibility,’ and ‘emotional stability,’respectively. The variable of preservice teachers’ university showedsignificant difference regarding the self-perception of interculturalcompetence. By culture, results revealed that preservice teachers fromSwitzerland had higher intercultural competence than those from Turkey,though such competence did not show significant differences according togender and department.Conclusions and Recommendations: The variable of nationality significantdiffered in preservice teachers’ perceptions of intercultural competence. InSwitzerland, whose preservice teachers’ perceptions of such competencewere higher, teacher training curricula include courses onmulticulturalism and intercultural education, while in Turkey suchcourses are not offered even as electives. Understanding multiculturalismnecessitates the renewal of preservice and in-service teacher trainingprograms. Teacher training should align with international standards andtopics, and include a systematic approach to promote interculturalcompetence.

___

  • Aleem, S. (2005). Emotional stability among college youth. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 31(1, 2), 100-102.
  • Altundağ, P. (2007). Kültürlerarası yeterlilik ve Korece öğretimi [Intercultural competence and Korean Language learners]. Unpublished master dissertation, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Arends-Toth, J. & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249-266.
  • Arslan, H. (2009). Educational policy vs. culturally sensitive programs in Turkish educational system. International Journal of Progressive Education, 5 (2), 44- 57.
  • Arslanoğlu, İ. (2000). Kültür ve medeniyet kavramları [Concepts of culture and civilization]. Gazi Üniversitesi Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, 15, 243- 255.
  • Banks, J. & Banks, C. (2007). Multicultural education, perspectives and issues. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley &Sons.
  • Banks, J. A. (2009). Multicultural education: Dimensions and paradigms. In J. Banks (Ed.), Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 9- 32). New York: Routledge.
  • Banks, J. A. (1999). An introduction to multicultural education (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &Bacon.
  • Banting, K., Kymlicka, W., Johnston, R. & Soroka, S. (2006). Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in advanced democracies. In K.
  • Banting and W. Kymlicka, (Eds.), Do MulticulturalismPolicies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis (pp. 49-91). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 27 2010 from http://www.snsoroka.com/files/2006Bantingetal(OUP).pdf
  • Batelaan, P. & Hoof, C. V. (1996) Cooperative learning in intercultural education. European Journal of Intercultural Studies, 7 (3), 5–17.
  • Bennett, C.I. (2003). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Bhawuk, D. P. S. & Brislin, R. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16 (4), 413–436.
  • Bisballe, L. (2006). The intercultural city - making the most of diversity (Thematic study). Social entrepreneurship as a space for intercultural communication and innovation. Retrieved February 3 2014 from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/cities/Publication/Soci alEntrepreneurship.pdf
  • Byram, M. (2000). Assessing intercultural competence in language teaching. Sprogforum, 18 (6), 8-13.
  • Callen, D. (2008). How intercultural competence drives success in global virtual teams. Graziadio Business Review, 11(4). Retrieved February 3 2014 from http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/2010/08/how-intercultural-competence-drivessuccess- in-global-virtual-teams/
  • Carter, P. (2010). Race and cultural flexibility among students in different multiracial schools. The Teachers College Record, 112(6), 1-2.
  • Chen, G. M. & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 19, 353-383.
  • Cırık, İ. (2008). Çokkültürlü eğitim ve yansımaları [Multicultural education and its reflections]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 27-40.
  • Clark, M. J. (2003). Community health nursing caring for populations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Cogan, J. J. & Morris, P. (2001). The development of civics values: an overview. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 1- 9.
  • Cogan, J. J. & Pederson, P. V. (2001). The development of civic values: case study of the United States of America. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 61-76.
  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Çüçen, K. (2005). Kültür, uygarlık, evrensellik ve çok kültürlülük [Culture, civilization, universality and multi-culture]. Kaygı Uludağ Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi, 12 (4), 111–115.
  • Delpit, L, (1996). Other people's children. Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
  • Dong, Q., Day, K. D. & Collaço, C. M. (2008). Overcoming ethnocentrism through developing intercultural communication sensitivity and multiculturalism. Human Communication, 11 (1), 27-38.
  • Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation, (1999). Constitution fédérale de la Confédération suisse du 18 avril 1999 (État le 29 mars 2005). Retrieved July 14 2011 from http://www.admin.ch/ch/f/rs/1/101.fr.pdf
  • Federal Statistical Office, (2010). Statistical data on Switzerland 2011. Neuchâtel: Federal Statistical Office. Retrieved July 14 2011 from http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/news/publikationen.html? publicationID=4527
  • Fritz, W., Möllenberg, A. & Chen, G.M. (2002). Measuring intercultural sensitivity in different cultural contexts. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11 (2), 165-176.
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Howard, T. C. & Del Rosario, C. D. (2000). Talking race in teacher education: The need for racial dialogue in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 21, 127-137.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Kültürel psikoloji: Kültür bağlamında insan ve aile [Cultural psychology: Culture in the context of human and family]. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kayabaş, E. & Kütküt, Ö. M. (2011). Türkiye’de din veya inanç temelinde ayrımcılığın izlenmesi raporu [The report regarding the monitoring of discrimination based on faith and religion in Turkey]. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi yayınları.
  • Kealey, D. J. (1989). A study of cross-cultural effectiveness: Theoretical issues, practical applications. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 387– 428.
  • Kostova, S. (2009). Çok kültürlü eğitim: Bulgaristan örneği [Multicultural education: Bulgaria sample]. Kaygı Uludağ Üniversitesi Felsefe Dergisi, 12, 217 – 230.
  • Lappan, G. & Le, Y. (2002). Reflections and recommendations. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 227-232.
  • Larke, P. & Larke, A. (2009). Teaching diversity/multicultural education courses in the academy: Sharing the voices of six professors. Research in Higher Education Journal, 3, 1-8.
  • Leeman, Y. A. M. (2003). School leadership for intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 14 (1), 31-45.
  • Leone, L., Van der Zee, K.I., Van Oudenhoven, J.P., Perugini, M. & Ercolani, A.P. (2005). The cross-cultural generalizability and validity of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1449-62.
  • Loosemore, M. & Al Muslmani, H. S. (1999). Construction project management in the persian gulf: Inter-cultural communication. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (2), 95-100.
  • Luka, I.(2009). Development of students’ English for Special Purposes competence in tourism studies at tertiary level. English for Specific Purposes World. Online Journal for Teachers, 4 (25), 1-32. Retrieved April 22 2010 from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_25/Ineta_Luka_ESP_World.pdf
  • McMahan, G. C., Bell, M. P. & Virick, M. (1998). Strategic human resource management: employee involvement, diversity, and international issues. Human Resource Management Review, 8 (3), 193-214.
  • Neuharth-Pritchett, S., Reiff, J.C. & Pearson, C.A. (2001). Through the eyes of preservice teachers: Implications for the multicultural. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15 (2), 256-269.
  • Nieto, S. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (3), 180- 187.
  • Önder, A. H. (2006). Türkiye'nin etnik yapısı-Halkımızın kökenleri ve gerçekler [Ethnicity in Turkey- Origin of our people and the realities]. İstanbul: Fark yayınları.
  • Parekh, B., (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism, cultural diversity and political theory. London: Palgrave.
  • Polat, S. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının çok kültürlü eğitime yönelik kişilik özellikleri [Probationary teachers’ level of inclination to multi-cultural education]. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 154-164.
  • Ruben, B. (1976). Assessing communication competency for intercultural adaptation. Group & Organization Studies, 1(3), 334-354.
  • Şener, C. (2004). Türkiye'de yaşayan etnik ve dinsel gruplar [Ethnic and religious groups living in Turkey]. İstanbul: Etik Yayınları
  • Spiecker, B. & Steutel, J. (2001). Multiculturalism, pillarization and liberal civic education in the Netherlands. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 293-304.
  • Spindler, G. & Spindler, L. (1993). The process of culture and person. In Phelan, Patricia, & Davidson, Ann Locke (Eds.). Renegotiating cultural diversity in American schools (pp. 27-51). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Sultana, Q. (1994). Evaluation of multicultural education's understanding and knowledge in freshman level preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Retrieved July 23 2010 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED389672
  • TUİK, (2011). İstatistiklerle Türkiye [Turkey in Statistics]. Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik kurumu.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası [Constitution of the Turkish Republic], (1982). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Resmi Gazete, 17863, 9 Kasım1982.
  • Unutkan, P. Ö. (2007). Çin’i ülke ve kültür olarak 5-6 yaş çocuklarına tanıtan eğitim programının etkisi [An experimental study testing the effects of a curriculum introducing china as a country and culture to 5-6 years of children]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 26, 155-162.
  • Van der Zee, K. I. & Van Oudenhoven, , J. P. (2000). The multicultural personality questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument for multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 291-309.
  • Van der Zee, K. I.; Zaal, Jac N. & Piekstra, J. (2003). Validation of the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire in the context of personnel selection. European Journal of Personality, 17 (l1), 77-100.
  • Van Oudenhoven J. P. & Van der Zee, K. I. (2002) Predicting multicultural effectiveness of international students: The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26 (6), 679-694.
  • Villegas, A. & Lucas, T. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers: A coherent approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Pres.
  • Williams, T. R. (2009). The reflective model of intercultural competency: a multidimensional, qualitative approach to study abroad assessment. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 18, 289-306.
  • Yamazaki, Y. & Kayes, D. C. (2004). An experiential approach to cross-cultural learning: A review and integration of competencies for successful expatriate adaptation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(4), 362-379.
  • Zeichner, K. (1993). Educating teachers for cultural diversity. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
  • Zhu, H. (2001). From intercultural awareness to intercultural empathy. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 116-119.