Undergraduate students' perceptions of teaching quality in higher education

Bu araştırmanın iki amacı vardır. Birincisi, Ginns, Prosser ve Barrie (2007) tarafından geliştirilen Öğrencilerin Ders Deneyimleri ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. İkincisi ise, ölçeğin yeni formu kullanılarak lisans öğrencilerin algılarına göre, Adıyaman Üniversitesinin farklı birimleri ile beş üniversitenin eğitim fakültelerindeki öğretimin kalitesini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin dilsel eşdeğerliğinin sağlanmasında geri çeviri yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri ile yapılmış ve bu sürece 862 öğrenci katılmıştır. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alfa güvenirlik katsayısı 0.83 olarak bulunmuştur. Verilerin analizinde SPSS ve Lisrel paket programları kullanılmıştır. Ölçek beş farklı üniversiteden 1415 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, hem yeni kurulan hem de gelişmekte olan üniversitelerin eğitim fakülteleri arasında öğretimin kalitesi yönünden bir farklılığın olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin algılarına göre eğitim fakültelerinde kalite sorunu bulunmaktadır.

Üniversitedeki lisans ögrencilerinin ögretimin kalitesine ilişkin algıları

The purpose of this study was to examine undergraduate students perceptions of teaching quality. The first aim is to adapt the Course Experience Questionnaire (SCEQ) scale developed by Ginns, Prosser and Barrie (2007). The second aim is to compare undergraduate students studying at five faculties of Adıyaman university as well as students from faculties of education at five different universities. A scanning method was used in the study. Translation validity was used through back translation method. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used for reliability and validity of the scale. The Cronbach s alfa was determined as 0.83. The scale, adapted to the Turkish context through SPSS and Lisrel. The scale was conducted on 1415 undergradute students studying at five different universities. Students perceptions did not differ with regards to teaching quality at faculties of education at universities whether be a newly founded one or not. Students perceptions also revealed no significant problem in teaching quality at faculties of education.

___

  • Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of super-complexity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bailey, K.D. (1994). Methods of social research, Fourt Edition, New York, N.Y., A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
  • Bakioğlu, A. & Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. (2007). Academics’ perceptions of private university establishment standards and teaching quality. T. Townsend & R. Bates (eds.). Globalization and Standards: Teacher Education in Times of Change (pp. 157-179). The Netherlands, Springer Press.
  • Bakioğlu, A. & Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. (2010). Male and female undergraduate students’ perceptions of ıntegration: pessimism versus hope. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. 5, 130-141.
  • Barnes, J., Cote, J., Cudeck, R. & Malthouse, E. (2001). Factor analysis—checking assumptions of normality before conducting factor analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1,2), 79-81.
  • Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of Royal Statistic Society. 16 (Series B), 296-298.
  • Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. International Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 139 161.
  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). The Society for Research into Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Brint, S., Turk, B. L., Proctor, K., Murphy, S., & Hanneman, R. (2009). The market model and the growth and decline of academic fields in US colleges and universities, 1975-2000. http:// www.higher-ed2000.ucr.edu./Publications/Brint%20et%20al%20(2009a)pdf newcollege. asu.edu/harcs/degrees/majors/womenstudies. 20.10.2009.
  • Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York London. The Guildford Press.
  • Brown, G. & Atkins, M. (1991). Effective teaching in higher education. UK: Routledge.
  • Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four. recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum.
  • Cote, J., R. Netemeyer, R. & Bentler, P. (2001). Structural equation modelling—improving model fit by correlating errors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(1, 2), 87–88.
  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  • De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Dill, D. (2010). Quality assurance in higher education: Practices and issues. The 3rd International Encyclopedia of Education, 377-383.
  • Duff, A., Boyle, E.,Dunleavy, K., Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1907-1920.
  • Entwistle, N., Skinner, D., Entwistle, D. & Orr, S. (2000). Conceptions and beliefs about “good teaching”: an integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 5-26.
  • Entwistle, N., & Walker, P. (2002). Strategic alertness and expanded awareness within sophisticated conceptions of teaching. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (pp. 15–39). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
  • Floyd. F.J., Widaman.K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment Instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299.
  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., van den Bossche, P., & Struyven, K. (2005). Students’perceptions of a problem-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 8, 41-66.
  • Ginns, P., Prosser, M. & Barrie, S.(2007). Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 603–615.
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.)., NJ: Erlbaum. Hillsdale
  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
  • Gümüşeli, A. İ., Zagudillin, M., & Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. (2012). Implementation of change at the local level: Motivations for internationalization of higher education among university lecturers. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi. (Under Review).
  • Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. & Özdemir, N. (2010). Undergraduates expectations of foundation universities: recommendations for university administrators. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 35(155), 118-131.
  • Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö. (2010). Balance in academic leadership: Voices of women leaders from Turkey and the U.S. Perspectives in Education, 28(2), 51-63.
  • Helfand, D.J. (2010). What are the benefits of interdisciplinary education? Erudito, February. http://eruditojournal.org/?page_id=163
  • Hopkin, A. G. (1999). Quality control and quality assurance in teacher training institutions. Messages from Bostwana. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 697-713.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M.R.(2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modelling: concepts, ıssues, and aplications. London: Sage Publication Inc.
  • Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit ındexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London and Thousand Oaks: Calif. 224-225.
  • Jörreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modelling with the simplis command language. Scientific Software International Inc., Lincolnwood, IL 60712-1704,USA.
  • Jörreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, Scientific Software International Inc.
  • Kehm, B. M. (2006). The german system of accreditation. Public Policy for Academic Quality Research Program. NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London: Academic Press.
  • Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
  • Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Third Edition. The Guilford Press, New York, NY 10012.
  • Knight, J. (1994) Internationalization of canadian universities (Ottawa, Canada: UMI Dissertation Services), Retrieved February 15, 2007, from http://www.csc.scc.gc.ca,.
  • Knight, J. (1999). Internationalisation of higher education. In J. Knight & H. de Wit (Eds), Quality and Internationalisation of Higher Education. Paris: IMHE/OECD.
  • Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 319-339.
  • Kuh, G.D. & Hu, S. (2001) The Effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309-332.
  • Lee, Dow, K. (2008). An evaluation of the australian learning and teaching council 2005–2008. http:// www.altc.edu.au/system/files/documents/D08%201652%20%20An%20Evaluation%20 of% 20the%20ALTC%202005-2008%20%20Professor%20Kwong%20Lee%20Dow%20 AM%20130808.pdf (accessed 20 August 2009).
  • Looman, W.S. & Farrag, S.(2009). Psychometric properties and cross-cultural equivalence of the arabic social capital scale: instrument development study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 45-54.
  • MacCallum, R.C. & Widaman, K.F. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99.
  • MacCallum, R.C. Browne, M.W., Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
  • Massy, W. F. (2005). Education quality audit as applied in hong kong. Public Policy for Academic Quality Research Program. NC: University of North Carolina.Chapel Hill.
  • Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading academics. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • OECD (2003). Changing patterns of higher education. OECD Education Policy Analysis.
  • Parpala, A., Ylänne, S. L. (2007). University teachers’ perceptions of good teaching in the units of high quality education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 355-370.
  • Pennee, D. P. (2007). Between cultures: using curriculum assessment to develop and deliver the integrated core of an arts and sciences program. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 112, 59-67.
  • Pennington, G. (1994). Developing learning agents. In P. Nightingale and M. O. Neil (eds) Achieving quality learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37-48.
  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405-419.
  • Read, B., Archer, L., & Leathwood, C. (2003). Challenging cultures? student conceptions of ‘belonging’ and ‘isolation’ at a post-1992 university. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 261-277
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge
  • Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. & Martin, E. (2007). University teachers’ experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. Learning and Instruction, 17, 140- 155.
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modelling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Ramsden, P., Martin, E. and Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils’ approaches to learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 129-42.
  • Ryan, Y., and Fraser, K. (2010). Education development in higher education. In McGaw, Peterson, and Baker (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd edition, 4, 411-418, UK, Oxford, Elsevier.
  • Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M. & Coates, D. (2000). University students’ expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education. 25 (3), 309-323.
  • Scherer, R. F., Wiebe F. A., Luther, D. C., & Adams J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62, 763-770.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Müller, H. (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, G., Nora, A. &, Barlow, E.A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99 (6), 323-337.
  • Sperber, A. D.(2004). Translation and validation of study ınstruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126, 124-128.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S.(2007). Using multivariate statistics. Fifth Edition Pearson Education. Inc.
  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
  • Trow, M. (2005). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In Altbach, P. (ed.) International Handbook of Higher Education, pp. 243-280. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in practice: getting started with a SIMPLIS approach. Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York.
  • Vermeulen, L. & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Learning environment, learning process, academic outcomes, career success of university graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 431- 451.
  • Wright, W. A., & O’Neill, M. C. (1995). Teaching improvement practices: international perspectives, 311-317. In W. A. Wright (Ed.), Successful faculty development strategies. Boston: Anker Publishing Co.