Öğrencilerin Matematiğe Yönelik İçsel ve Dışsal Motivasyonlarının Belirlenmesi

Motivasyon, birçok alanda özellikle de eğitimde çok etkili bir faktördür. Motivasyon, öğrencilerin matematik gibi anlamakta zorlandıkları derslerde özellikle ihmal edilmemesi gereken bir boyuttur. Motivasyonun içsel ve dışsal boyutuyla ilgili birçok araştırma yapılmıştır. Bu araştırmaların sonuçları, bir derse yönelik dışsal motivasyonun artmasının o derse (nesne) yönelik içsel motivasyonu azaltıp azaltmadığına dair farklı görüşler ortaya koymaktadır. Bu araştırmada, öğrencilerin matematik dersine yönelik içsel ve dışsal motivasyonları arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Ankara il merkezindeki bir ilköğretim okulunda okuyan 7. sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri, 26 maddeden oluşan motivasyon ölçeğinin öğrencilere 4 hafta süren (16 saat) bir deneysel çalışmadan önce ve sonra olmak üzere iki kez uygulanması sonucu elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, öğrencilerin matematiğin öğretiminin dışsal eğilimlerinden daha çok içsel eğilimlerini harekete geçirecek şekilde yapılmasını istediklerini ortaya koymaktadır.Ayrıca, öğrencilerin matematiğe yönelik dışsal motivasyonlarını arttırıcı faktörlerin, öğrencilerin matematiğe yönelik içsel motivasyonlarında bir azalmaya/artmaya neden olmadığı da belirlenmiştir.

Identification of Students' Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Towards Mathematics

As in any other field, motivation is a main factor in education. Motivation in courses that are present difficulty in comprehension to students, such as mathematics, should not be neglected. There have been many studies into the intrinsic and extrinsic dimensions of motivation. The results of these studies emphasize distinct ideas as to whether the increasing of extrinsic motivation in a course undermines intrinsic motivation. In this study, the relationships between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of students were examined. The sample consists of 7th grade middle school students in Ankara. Data were collected by means of a motivation scale of 26 questions lasting 4 weeks which was applied to students before and after an experimental study. The results of the research show that the students expectations tend towards intrinsic inclinations rather than extrinsic ones in mathematics teaching. It is also determined thatthere was no decrease/increase in students’ intrinsic motivation towards mathematics as a result of increasing extrinsic motivation towards mathematics.

___

  • Aksu, M. (1985). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında matematik öğretimi ve sorunları. T.E.D. Yayınları, Öğretim Dizisi, No: 3. Ankara: Yorum-Basın Ltd. Şti.
  • Cameron, J. & Pierce, D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward and intrinsic motivation: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64 (3), 363 – 423.
  • Cameron, J. & Pierce, D. (1996). The debate about rewards and intrinsic motivation: Protest and accusation do not alter the result. Review of Educational Research, 66 (1), 39-51.
  • Cameron, J. Banko, K. & Pierce, D. (2001). Pervasive negatif effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24 (1), 1-44.
  • Campeau, L. (1994). Teachers influence on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the classroom. Retrieved April 3, 2002 (de indirildi) from the Worldwide Web: http://chat.carleton.ca/~lcapea/teacher_ influence. htm--
  • Dweck, C. (1985). Intrinsic motivation, perceived control and self-edvaluation maintanence: An achievement goal analysis. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.) Research on motivation in education. USA: Academic Pres, Inc.
  • Fan, X. (2001). Statistical significance and effect size in education research: Two sides of a coin. The Journal of Educational Research, 94 (5), 275-282.
  • Gray, E. & Tall, D. (1992). Success and failure in mathematics: The flexible meaning of symbols as process and concept. Mathematics Teaching, 142, 6–10.
  • Green, S., Salkind, N. & Akey, T. (2000). Using SPPS for Windows, analyzing and understanding data. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Harackievicz, J., Steven, A. & Wageman, R. (1987). Performance evaluation and ıntrinsic motivation: The effects of evaluative focus, rewards and achievement orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (6), 1015-1023.
  • Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39 (2), 98-108.
  • Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (1985). Motivational process in cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning situations. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.). Research on motivation in education. USA: Academic Pres, Inc.
  • Kazusa, K. (1999). Oral self-expression activities as a facilitator of students’ positive attitudes and motivation. Retrieved August 12, 2002 (de indirildi) from the World wide Web: www.surrey.ac.uk/ELI/kudok.pdf .
  • Keller, J. & Kopp, T. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.) Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. New Jersey: Hillsdale.
  • Koestner, R., Ryan, B. & Kathleen, H. (1984). Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (3), 233 - 248.
  • Lumsden, L. (1999). Student motivation: Cultivating a love of learning. Clearinghouse on Educational Management, College of Education, University of Oregon.
  • Main, R. (1993). Integrating motivation into the instructional design process. Educational Technology, December, 37 - 41.
  • Martin, B.L. & Briggs, L. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for ınstruction and research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  • McGinnis, J.C., Friman, P. & Carlyon, W. (1999). The effect of token rewards on intrinsic motivation for doing math. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 375-379.
  • Middleton, J. & Spanish, P. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations and criticism of the research. JRME Online, January, 65-88.
  • Raffini, J. (1996). 150 ways to increase intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Massachusetts: Simon & Schuster Company.
  • Ryan, R. & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
  • Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Values in mathematics textbooks: A view through the Australian regions. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April.
  • Shia, R. (1998). Assessing academic intrinsic motivation: A look at student goals and personal strategy. Retrieved April 3, 2000 (de indirildi) from the World wide Web: www.cet.edu/research/papers/motivation/ motivation.pdf
  • Spector, P. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. London: Sage Publications.
  • Spitzer, D. (1996). Motivation: The neglected factor in instructional design. Educational Technology, May- June, 45 - 49.
  • Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Warren, A. (2000). OK. Retry, abort? Factors affecting the motivation of online students. Presented At The ILT’s Web Based Learning Professional Development Day, University of East Anglia, March 3st .