Investigating Formative Assessment

Değişik değerlendirme teknikleri vardır. 8u makalenin amacı, bilgilendirici değerlendirmeyi ve bu tip değerlendirmenin öğrenmeyle olan ilişkisini detaylı bir şekilde incelemektir. Bilgilendirici değerlendirme, öğrencilerin bilgilerini ve anlamalarını tespit etmede kullanılabilir. Bu da öğrencilere dönüt vermede ve öğrencilerin öğrenmeleri için gerekli olan sonraki basamakların planlanmasında faydalı olacaktır. Bu yüzden, bilgilendirici değerlendirmenin öğrencilerin öğrenmelerine olumlu yönde katkıda bulunması . beklenmektedir. Bilgilendirici değerlendirme sınıf ortamında zor olmasına rağmen, öğretmenlerin sorduğu sorular ve derslerde uygulanan bazı açık uçlu testler yoluyla öğretmenler, öğrencilerin anlamaları ile ilgili fikir sahibi olabilirler. Bu da öğretmenlerin, öğretmek için bir sonraki basamakların ne olacağını planlamalarım sağlamalarına yardımcı olur.

Bilgilendirici Değerlendirmenin İncelenmesi

There are different kinds of assessment. The purpose of this article is to investigate formative assessment and the link between formative assessment and learning in great depth. Formative assessment can be used to determine children's knowledge or understanding in order to give feedback and to help to plan the appropriate next steps for pupils' learning. Therefore, it can be stated that formative assessment is vital for the enhancement of students' learning. Although it seems difficult to apply formative assessment in classrooms, questions teachers ask and some open-ended tests can still give an idea of what pupils think and help teachers plan the next steps for their teaching.

PDF

___

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Black, P. (1999). Assessment, learning theories and testing systems. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, learning and assessment. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education, 5(1), 7-74.
Bloom, B (1971). Handbook of formative andsummative evaluation of student learning. New York McGraw-Hill.
Bowers, B. C (1989). Alternatives to standardised educational assessment. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 773.
Capel, S., Leask, M. & Turner, T. (1995). Learning to teach in the secondary school. London: Routledge.
Davis, R. B. (1992). Understanding "understanding". Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 11, 225- 241.
Denvir, B. (1989). Assessment purposes and learning in mathematics education. In P. Murphy & B. Moon (Eds.), Development in learning and assessment. London: Hodder and Stoughton Press.
Desforges, C. (1989). Testing and assessment. London: Cassell.
Fontana, D. & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of educational Psychology, 64,407-417.
Ginsburg, H. (1981). The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: aims, rationales, techniques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1 (3), 4-11.
Harlen, W. & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education, 4 (3), 365-379.
Jaworski, B. (1988). 'Is' versus 'seeing as': Constructivism and the mathematics classroom. Mathematics, Teachers and Children, 287- 296.
Schoenfeld, A (1982). Some thoughts on problem-solving research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical Problem solving: Issues in research. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
Selden, A. & Selden, J. (1997, February). Should mathematicians and mathematics educators be listening to cognitive psychologists? MAA, Retrieved June 11, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.maa.org/t_and_l/sampler/rs_2.html.
Shepard, L. (1991). Psychometricians' beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, 20 (7), 2-16.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.
Task Group on Assessment and Testing (TGAT), (1988). A report. London: DES.
Houssart, J. (6 February 1998). Unlucky number day. Times Educational Supplement.
Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Tunstall, P. & Gipps, C. (1996). How does your teacher help you to make your work better? Children's understanding of formative assessment. The Curriculum Journal, 7 (2), 185-203.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, R. (1987). Measurement and assessment in education and psychology. London: Farmer Press.