Alt Sosyo-Ekonomik Düzeyden Gelen Lise Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme-Öğretme Faaliyetlerine İlişkin Direnç Davranışları

Bu araştırmada, alt sosyo-ekonomik düzeyden gelen lise öğrencilerinin okuldaki öğrenme - öğretme faaliyetlerine ilişkin direnç davranışları incelenmiştir. Araştırma, ülkemizin yoğun göç alan şehirlerinden birisi olan Bursa şehir merkezinde, alt sosyo-ekonomik düzeyden gelen öğrencilerin devam ettiği üç lisede 528 öğrenci üzerinde yapılmıştır. Veriler, Lise Öğrencileri Direnç Ölçeği (LÖDÖ) ile toplanmış, Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann- Whitney U testleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, öğretmenlere, derslere ve ödevlere ilişkin olumsuz düşüncelere sahip öğrencilerin daha sık direnç davranışları gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Direnç davranışları bazı değişkenlere göre incelendiğinde de Sosyal ve Türkçe - Matematik şubelerindeki öğrencilerin, erkek öğrencilerin ve üç büyük şehir (tstanbul - Ankara - izmir) hariç, Bursa ve diğer bölgelerde doğan öğrencilerin daha sık direnç davranışları gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir.

Resistance to yhe Process of Learning and Teaching Among High School Students Who Come from a Lower Socio-Economic Level

In this study resistance to the process of learning and teaching among high school students who come from a lower socio-economic level is investigated. The research was conducted in Bursa, a city that has a considerable immigration rate in Turkey, in three schools in the city centre whose students come from lower socio- economical levels. The data was obtained using the Resistance Scale for High School Students (LÖDÖ) and then analyzed using the Kruskal- Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The information acquired shows more frequent resistance for students who have negative attitudes towards teachers, lessons and their homework. When analyzed according to a number of variables, resistance of: students in the social and Turkish- mathematics classes, male students, the students born in Bursa and other regions have been observed to show more frequent resistance than others.

___

  • Akyüz, H. (2(X)1). Eğitim sosyolojisinin temel kavram ve alanları üzerine bir araştırma. 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayını No: 2320.
  • Alpert, B. (1991). Students' resistance in the classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 350- 366.
  • Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry. 11, 3-42.
  • Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge.
  • Apple, M. W. (I9S0). Reproduction, contestation and curriculum: An essay in self-criticism. Journal of Education, 162 (1), 21-42.
  • Apple, Mi W. (1980/81). The other side of the hidden curriculum: Correspondence theories and the labor process. Interchange on Educational Policy, II (3), 5-22.
  • Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1985). Education under siege: The conservative liberal and radical debate over schooling. New York: Bervin & Garvey Publishers Inc.
  • Başar, H. (2001). Sınıf yönetimi. Beşinci Baskı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Book.
  • Brookfield, S. D. (1990). The skillful teacher. San Fransisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers.
  • Burroughs, N. R, Kearney, P. & Plax, T.G. (1989). Compliance-resistance in the college students. Communication Education, 38, 214- 229.
  • Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1982). Reliability and validity assessment. Fifth Printing. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Chan, C. & Treacy, M. J. (1996). Resistance in multicultural courses. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 212-221.
  • Cumins, J. (1989). Empowering minotity students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 18-34.
  • Cusick, P. (1992). The educational system: Its nature and logic. New York: Basic Books.
  • Ercan, I. (2002). Sağlık hizmeti veren kurumlarda hizmet memnuniyetini ölçmeye yönelik ölçek geliştirilmesi ve bir uygulama. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
  • Erickson, F. (1984). School literacy, reasoning, and civility: An anthropologist's perspective. Review of Educational Research, 54, 542- 546.
  • Everhart, R. B. (1983). Reading, writing, and resistance: Adolescence and labor in a junior high school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Fordham, C. & Ogbu, J. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the burden of 'acting white'. Urban Review, 18, 176- 206.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1983a). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. New York: Bervin & Garvey Publishers Inc.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1983b). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A Critical Analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 257- 293.
  • Gordon, D. (1991). Neo-Marxist approach. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 28-31).Oxford Pergamon Press,
  • Gutek G. L. (1997). Eğitime felsefi ve ideolojik yaklaşımlar. (Çev. N. Kale). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Higginbotham, E. (1996). Getting all students to listen. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 203- 211.
  • McFarland, D. A. (2001). Student resistance: How the formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (3), 612- 678.
  • McFarland, D. A. (2004). Resistance as a social drama: A study of change- oriented encounters. American Journal of Sociology, 109 (6), 1249- 1318.
  • McLaren, P. (1985). The ritual dimensions of resistance: Clowning and symbolic inversion. Journal of Education, 167 (2), 84- 97.
  • Ogbu, J. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18,312-334
  • Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. ikinci Baskı. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
  • Pauly, E. (1991). The classroom crucible: What really works, what doesn 't and why. New York: Basic Books.
  • Pincus, F. L. (2002). Marxist theories. In D. L. Levinson, P. W. Cookson, Jr. & A. R. Sadovnik (Eds.) Education and sociology: An Encyclopedia (587-592). New York: Routledge- Falmer.
  • Spaulding, A. (1995). A qualitative case study of teacher- student micropolitical interaction: The strategies, goals and consequences of student resistance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Tekin, H. (1977). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Mars Matbaası.
  • Thorndike, R. M., Cunningham, G. K., Thorndike, R. L. & Hagen, E. P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. Fifth Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
  • Walker, J. C. (1985). Rebels with our applause? A critique of resistance theory in Paul Willis's etnography of schooling. Journal of Education. 167 (2), 63- 83.
  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.