An Evaluation of the Studies on Environmental Attitude and Knowledge

An Evaluation of the Studies on Environmental Attitude and Knowledge

Bu çalışmanın amacı, çevre tutum ve bilgisini ölçmek için daha önce hazırlanan ölçeklerin yeniden değerlendirilmesi ve araştırma sonuçlarının çevre eğitimi alanındaki sunumundan kaynaklanan boşlukları gidermektir. Dört alt başlıktan oluşan çalışma sırası ile çevreciliğin farklı yorumlarına, araştırma teorilerine ve sonuçlarının yorumlanmasına, ölçek geliştirirken i/lenmesi gereken yollara ve araştırma metotlarına ilişkin eleştirel bakış açısı getirmektedir.

___

  • Abranıson, P. R. & İnglehart, R. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science, (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Arcury, T.A. & Christianson, E. H. (1993). Rural- urban differences in environmental knowledge and actions. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(1), 19-25.
  • Berberoglu, G. &Tosunoğlu, C. (1995). Exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses of an environmental attitude scale (EAS) for Turkish university students. Journal of Environmental Education, 26 (3), 40-44.
  • Blake, D. E. (2001). Contextual effects on environmental attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33 (5), 708-25.
  • Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H. & Yencken, D. (1999). "If it does not directly affect you, you do not think about it": A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 95-114.
  • Dunlap, R. E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7 (4), 428-54.
  • Dunlap, R.E., & Van Liere, K.D. (1978). The new environment paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
  • Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H. & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Health of the planet: Results of a 1992 international environmental opinion survey of citizens in 24 nations. A George H. Gallup Memorial Survey. Princeton, NJ: Gallup International Institute.
  • Easterlin, R. A. & Crimmins, E. M. (1991). Private materialism, personal self-fulfillment, family life, and public interest: The nature, effects, and causes of recent changes in the values of American youth. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 499-533.
  • Eaton, H. & Lorentzen, L..A. (2003). Ecofeminisin and Globalization: Exploring culture, context, and religion. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  • Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.
  • Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country. Environment and Behavior, 30 (4), 520-535.
  • Gambro, J. S. & Switzky, H. N. (1996). A national survey of high school students' environmental knowledge. Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 28-33.
  • Gigliotti, L. M. (1993). Environmental attitudes: 20 years of change. Journal of Environmental Education, 22 (1), 15-26.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1962). Secondary analysis: A strategy for the use of knowledge from research elsewhere. Social Problems, 10 (1), 70-74.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA:
  • Holsman, R. H. (2001). The politics of environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 32 (2), 4-7.
  • Hungerford, H., Peyton, R. B. & Wilke, J. R. (1980). Goals for curriculum development in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11 (3), 42-47.
  • Kasapoglu, M. A., & Ecevit, M. C. (2002). Attitudes and behavior toward the environment: The case of Lake Burdur in Turkey. Environment and Behavior, 34 (3), 363-377.
  • Kim, D. (1999). Environmentalism in developing countries and the case of a large Korean city. Social Science Quarterly, 80 (4), 810-29.
  • Krugman, P. R. (1992). Disparity and despair. U.S. News, 112 (11), 54-56.
  • Leeming, F. C, & Dwyer, W. O. (1995). Children's environmental attitude and knowledge scale: Construction and validation. Journal of Environmental Education, 26 (3), 22-31.
  • Ma, X. & Bateson, D. J. (1999). A multivariate analysis of the relationship between attitude toward science and attitude toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 31 (1), 27-33.
  • Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, March 5-11.
  • Mohai, P. & Bryant, B. (1998). Is there a "race effect" on concern for environmental quality? Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 475-505.
  • Musser, L. M. & Malkus, A. J. (1994). The children's attitudes toward the environment scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 25 (3), 22-26.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (2003). Psychology and environmental change. NJ, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
  • Neumayer, E. (2002). Do we trust the data? On the validity and reliability of cross-national environmental surveys. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 332- 340.
  • O'Riordan, T. (1988). The politics of sustainability. In R. Turner (Ed.), Sustainable environmental management: Principles and practice. London, England: Belhaven.
  • O'Riordan, T. (1995). Frameworks for choice: Core beliefs and the environment. Environment, 37 (8), 4-9, 25-29.
  • O'Sullivan, P.E. (1991). Shallow and deep environmental science. In J. Rose, (Ed.), Environmental concepts, policies, and strategies (pp.57-75). Paris, France: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
  • Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century. Theory, practice, progress, and promise (pp. 83-85). New York: Routledge.
  • Pirages, D. C. (1977). Introduction: A social design for sustainable growth. In D.C. Pirages (Ed.), The sustainable society, (pp. 1-13). New York: Praeger.
  • Rasinski, K. A. (1989). The effect of question wording on public support for government spending. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 388-394.
  • Rohrschneider, R. (1988). Equity and the distribution of environmental risk: The case of TRI facilities. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 811-29.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London, England: Sage.
  • Schindler, F. H. (1999). Development of the survey of environmental issue attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30 (3), 12-16.
  • Thorndike, R. M, Cunningham, G. K., Thorndike R. L. & Hagen, E. P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Uyeki, E. S. & Holland, J. L. (2000). Diffusion of pro-environment attitudes? American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (4), 646-662.
  • Vande Visse, E., & Stapp, W. B. (1975). Developing a K-12 environmental education program. In N. Mclnnis & D.Y. Albrecht (Eds.), What makes education environmental? Louisville, Kentucky: Data Courier, Inc.
  • Yılmaz, O., Boone, W. & Andersen, H. (2002). Development and analysis of environmental issues attitude scale for 4*"- 8™ grade students in Turkey. A paper presented at the meeting of the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LO.
  • Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Educational interventions that improve environmental behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal ofEnvirotvnental Education, 31 (1), 5-14.