Investigating 8th grade students' perceptions of constructivist science learning environment

Bu çalışmada, sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin mevcut ve tercih ettikleri yapılandırıcı fen öğrenme ortamı hakkındaki algıları incelenmiştir. Veriler, 1152 sekizinci sınıf öğrencisinden Yapılandırıcı Öğrenme Ortamı Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Bu ölçek, “mevcut” ve “tercih edilen” öğrenme ortamını değerlendiren iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin mevcut öğrenme ortamı bölümü, sınıflardaki şu anki fen bilgisi öğrenme ortamının yapılandırıcı öğrenme yaklaşımını ne kadar yansıttığını ölçerken, tercih edilen öğrenme ortamı bölümü ise öğrencilerin tercih ettikleri öğrenme ortamını ölçmektedir. Sonuçlar, ölçeğin her alt boyutu için tercih edilen yapılandırıcı öğrenme ortamı algılarının mevcut öğrenme ortamı algılarına göre daha yüksek değerlerde olduğunu göstermiştir (p

Sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin yapılandırıcı fen öğrenme ortamı hakkındaki algılarının incelenmesi

The present study investigated 8th grade students’ perceptions of actual and preferred constructivist science learning environments. Data were collected from 1152 students attending public elementary schools in Ankara using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES). The CLES consists of two forms which are “Actual” and “Preferred”. While actual form assesses the current learning environment of the classroom and the preferred form assesses the students’ preferences about the learning environment. Results showed that students’ scores on the preferred form were significantly higher than those of the actual form on each scale (p

___

  • Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P.C., & Chen, C.-C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a crossnational study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37-55.
  • Arisoy, N., Cakiroglu, J., & Sungur, S. (2007, April). A canonical analysis of learning environment perceptions and motivational beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
  • Cakiroglu, J., Tekkaya, C., & Rakici, N. (2007). Learning environments, teacher interpersonal behavior, and students’ attitudinal outcomes in science classrooms: A Turkish context. In Mutua, K. & Sunal, C. S. (Eds.), The enterprise of education research on education in Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East (pp. 291-311). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press..
  • Dorman, J. P., Adams, J. E., & Ferguson, J. M. (2001). Psychosocial environment and student self-handicapping in secondary school mathematics classes: A cross national study. Educational Psychology, 22, 499-511.
  • Dorman, J., & Adams, J. (2004). Associations between students’ perceptions of classroom environment and academic efficacy in Australian and British secondary schools. Westminster Studies in Education, 27, 69-85.
  • Fisher, D. L., Henderson, D., Fraser, B. J. (1995). Interpersonal behaviour in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25, 125-133.
  • Fraser, B. J. & Tobin, K. (1989). Student perceptions of psychosocial environments in classrooms of exemplary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 14-34.
  • Fraser, B. J. & Tobin, K. (Eds.) (1998). The international handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493-541), New York: Macmillan.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.
  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh, & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An interpersonal perspective (pp. 1-27). Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
  • Fraser, B. J., & Chionh, Y. H. (2000). Classroom environment self-esteem, achievement, and attitudes in geography and mathematics in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, CA.
  • Johnson B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7, 65-80.
  • Kim, H., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of constructivist science learning environments. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17, 239–249.
  • Lee, S., & Fraser, B. J. (2001). High school science classroom learning environments in Korea. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Lois, MO.
  • Margianti, E. S., Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. M. (2001). Investigating the learning environment and students’ outcomes at the university level in Indonesia. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Western Australia.
  • McRobbie, C. J., and Fraser, B. J. (1993). Associations between student outcomes and psychosocial science environment. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 78-85.
  • Scott, R., & Fisher, D. (2001). Science learning environments at the elementary school level in Brunei Darussalam. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science teaching, St Louis.
  • Taylor, P. & Fraser, B. (1991). Development of an instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  • Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B.J., & Fisher, D. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293-302.
  • Telli, S., Cakiroglu, J., & den Brok, P. (2006). Turkish secondary education students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environment and their attitude towards biology. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: world views (pp.517-542). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Tsai, C-C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42, 193-205.
  • Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö., Çakıroğlu, J., & Boone, W. J. (2006). Turkish high school students’ perceptions of constructivist learning environment in chemistry classrooms and their attitudes towards chemistry. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, USA.
  • Waldrip, B. G., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). City and country students’ perceptions of teacher-student interpersonal behavior and classroom learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Wanpen, S., & Fisher, D. L. (2006). Creating a collaborative learning environment in a computer classroom in Thailand using the CLES. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: world views (pp.297-312). Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1998). Classroom learning environment in urban elementary, middle, and high schools. Learning Environment Research, 1, 95–113.