Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmeye Yönelik Tutumları ve Görüşleri

Bu çalışmada Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi öğrencilerinin probleme dayalı öğrenmeye (PDÖ) ilişkin tutumları ve görüşlerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada betimsel yöntem kullanılarak nicel ve nitel veri toplama yöntemleri birlikte kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya ilk üç yıl öğrencileri (810 öğrenci) katılmıştır. Ayrıca çalışmada 3 odak grup görüşmesinde 15 öğrenci ile görüşme yapılmıştır. Çalışmada PDÖ’ye yönelik tutum ölçeği ve görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Ortaöğretim sırasında öğrenen merkezli uygulamalara yer verildiğini belirten öğrencilerin ve Dönem I ve Dönem II öğrencilerinin tutum puanları daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Öğrencilerin cinsiyetlerine göre anlamlı fark belirlenmemiştir. Odak grup görüşmelerinde, öğrencilerin PDÖ sürecinde yönlendirici ve öğrenci için tanımladıkları rollerin alanyazında belirlenen rollerle örtüştüğü, hazırlanan senaryo ve materyallerle birlikte, değerlendirme ve PDÖ’nün yürütülmesine ilişkin sorunların PDÖ’de öğrenme sürecini etkilediğine ilişkin görüşler belirlenmiştir.

Hacettepe University medical school students' views on and attitudes towards problem-based learning

The aim of this study is to describe medical students’ views on and attitudes towards problem based learning (PBL). Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used in this descriptive study. First, third year students (n=810) of Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine took part in the study. Fifteen students were interviewed in three (3) focus group interviews. Data gathering instruments were the attitude scale towards PBL and an interview form. The attitude score of students who reported learner-centered method was used at the secondary school and the attitude score of the first and second year students were found higher. There was no significant difference on attitude scores between genders. It was observed that students and tutor roles explained during focus group interviews overlap with the described roles in PBL literature. Students stated that the problems about conducting PBL and evaluation in PBL as well as PBL scenarios and materials have effect on learning process.

___

  • Albanese, M. (2000). Problem-based learning: Why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education, 34, 729-738.
  • Albanese,M.A. ve Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.
  • Baptiste, S. (2003). Problem-based learning: A self-directed journey. Thorofare (USA): SLACK Incorporated. Bhattacharya, N. (1998). Students’ perceptions of problem-based learning at the B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Nepal. Medical Education 32, 407-410.
  • Biley, F.C. ve Smith, K.L. (1999). Making sense of problem-based learning: The perceptions and experiences of undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(5), 1205- 1212.
  • Birgegard, G. ve Lindquist, U. (1998). Change in student attitudes to medical school after the introduction of problem-based learnnig in spite of low rating. Medical Education, 32, 46-49.
  • Bridges, E. ve Hallingewr, P. (2003). Problem-based learning in educational leadership. İçinde W.G. Cunningham ve P.A. Cordeiro (2003, sf: 334-335). Educational Leadership A Problem- Based Approach (2nd Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum, 6. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Camp, G. (2003). Probleme Dayalı Öğrenme Nedir, Ne Değildir? F. Darendeliler (Çev.) Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 2. Caplow, H.A.J., Donaldson, J.F., Kardash, C.A ve Hosokowa M. (1997). Learning in a problembased curriculum: Students conceptions. Medical Education, 31, 440-447.
  • Carder, L., Willingham, P. ve Bibb, D. (2001) Case-based, problem learning information literacy for the real world. Research Strategies, 8, 181-190.
  • De Grave, W.S, Dolmans, D.H.J.M. ve van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (1998). Tutor intervention profile: Reliability and validity. Medical Education, 1998; 32:262-268.
  • De Grave, W.S., Dolmans, D.H.J.M., van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (1999), Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: Scaffolding student learning. Medical Education, 33, 901-906. Demirören, M. (2005), Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Probleme Dayalı Öğrenme Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Bilim Dalı, Ankara. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave W. S., Wolfhagen I. H. A. P. ve van der Vleuten C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39, 732–741.
  • Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Snellen-Balendong, H., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P. ve van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1997). Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 185-189.
  • Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Gijselaers, W.H., Moust, J.H.C., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P. ve van der Vleuten C. (2002). Trends in research on tutor in problem-based learnining: Conclution and implication for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher, 24(2),173-180.
  • Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, I. ve Schmidt, H. (1993, April), Validitation of a rating scale for tutor evaluation in a problem-based medical curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, Atlanta. Eggen, P. ve Kauchak, D. (2001). Learning and Teaching: Research Based Metods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Erdem, E. (2006). Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmenin Öğrenme Ürünlerine, Problem Çözme Becerisine ve Özyeterlik Algı Düzeyine Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Bilim Dalı, Ankara. Felder, R. M. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44, 43-47.
  • Goldie J., Schwartz L. ve Morrison J. (2000). A process evaluation of medical ethics education in the first year of a new medical curriculum, Medical Education, 34, 468-463.
  • Guilbert, J.J. (1998). Comparison of the students and teachers concerning medical education programmes in Switzerland. Medical Education, 32:65-69.
  • Hadwin, A. F. (1996, April). Promoting self-regulation: examining the relationships between problembased learning in medicine and strategic content learning approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. Hendry, G.D., Ryan, G. ve Haris, J. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 25(6), 609-616.
  • Hill, J., Rolfe, I. E., Pearson SA ve Heathcote A. (1998). Do junior doctors feel they are prepared for hospital practice? A study of graduates from traditional and non-traditional medical schools. Medical Education, 32, 19-24.
  • Hmelo, C., Gotterer, G.S. ve Bransford J.D. (1994, April). The cognitive effects of problem-based learning: a preliminary study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. İşcil, N. (1977). Örnekleme Yöntemleri. Ankara: Kalite Matbaası. Levin, B. B. (2001). Energizing education and professional development with problem based learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum web sayfasından 09.10.2003 tarihinde alındı: http://www.samford.edu/schools/education/EDUC320.htm Maudsley, G. (1999). Education and debate: roles and responsibilities of the problem based learning tutor in the undergraduate medical curriculum, BMJ, 318. Morales-Mann, E. T. ve Kaitell, C.A. (2001). Problem-based learning in a new Canadian curriculum. Journal of Advanced Learning, 33 (1):13-19.
  • Paris, S.G. ve Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.
  • Plucker, J.A. (1999). How to use problem based learning in the classroom (Book Plucker 1999). Roeper Plucker, 22(1), 69-70.
  • Prince, K. J. A. H., van Eijs, P. W. L. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., van der Vleuten, C. P. M. ve Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2005). General competencies of problem-based learning (PBL) and non-PBL graduates. Medical Education, 39, 394–401. Reynolds, F. (2003). Initial experiences of inter professional problem-based learning: a comparision of male and female students’ views. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 17(1), 35-44.
  • Sungur, S. ve Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 307-17.
  • Tavanaiepour, D., Schwartz, P.L. ve Loten, E.G. (2002). Faculty opinions about pre-clinical curriculum. Medical Education, 36, 299-302.
  • Torp, L. ve Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: problem-based learning for k-12 education. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Turan, S. ve Demirel, Ö. (2009). Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmeye İlişkin Tutum Ölçeği Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(152): 15-29.
  • Vernon, D.T. ve Blake, R.L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–556. White, M.J., Amos, E. ve Kouzekanani, K. (1999). Problem-based learning: an outcomes study. Nurse Educator, 24(2), 33-36.
  • Willis, S.C., Jones, A., Bundy, C., Burdett, K., Whitehouse, C.R. ve O’Neill, P.A. (2002). Small-goup work and assessment in a PBL curriculum: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of student perceptions of the process of working in small groups and assessment. Medical Teacher, 24(5), 495-501.
  • Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine problem based learning. BMJ,326, 328-330.