Duygusal özerklik ölçeği’nin ergenler için uyarlanması ve psikometrik özellikleri

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ergenlikte önemli bir gelişimsel özellik olan duygusal özerkliği ölçmek için Steinberg & Silverberg (1986) tarafından geliştirilen Duygusal Özerklik Ölçeği’nin (Emotional Autonomy Scale) Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Özgün formu İngilizce olan ölçek, toplam 20 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Özgün ölçek hem alanda hem de dilde uzman olan altı öğretim elemanı tarafından Türkçeye çevrilmiştir. Ayrıca, ölçeğin geri çevirisi iki alan uzmanı tarafından yapılmıştır. Daha sonra, ölçeğin özgün ve Türkçe formu uzman görüşüne sunulmuş ve onlardan gelen öneriler doğrultusunda gerekli düzenlemeler yapılarak son form oluşturulmuştur. DÖÖ’nün Türkçe versiyonu Ankara’da 8., 9., 10. ve 11. sınıflara devam eden toplam 720 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Özgün çalışmadaki 4 faktörlü yapının test edildiği pilot çalışmada, faktörlerin orijinal faktör desenine uygun bir biçimde dağılmadığı gözlenmiştir. Türk ergen örnekleminde ana-babayı birey olarak görme alt boyutunun düşük yük değerlerine sahip olduğu belirlenmiş olduğundan bu çalışmada DÖÖ’ nün üç faktörlü yapısı doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yöntemiyle test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, DÖÖ’ nün üç faktörlü yapısının doğrulandığını ve ergenlerin duygusal özerklik düzeylerini ölçmede kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

An adaptation of the Emotional Autonomy Scale to the Turkish adolescents and its psychometric properties

The aim of this study was to adapt the Emotional Autonomy Scale (EAS) developed by Steinberg and Silverberg (1986) so as to use it with Turkish adolescents. The original scale is in English and has four factors, consisting of 20 items. Firstly, the original scale was translated into Turkish by six experts from the field and was retranslated by two experts. Later, the original and Turkish forms of the scale were handed to the experts in the field of measurement and evaluation and the last form of the scale was carried out in the lights of their opinions. The Turkish form of the EAS was conducted to 720 students (aged 14-18 years), attending 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th grades in Ankara, Turkey. The pilot study tested four-factor structure of the original scale revealed that factors were not distributed in accordance with original factor pattern and the subscale “perceive parents as people” had lower factor. Thus, a three factor structure was analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis in this study. Results indicated that a three factor structure of EAS was confirmed and valid and reliable instrument to assess adolescents’ emotional autonomy levels in Turkey.

___

  • Freud, A. (1958). Adolescence. In Freud, A. (ed.), The Writings of Anna Freud: Research at the Hampstead Child-Therapy Clinic and Other Papers (1956–1965), (Vol. 5, pp. 136–166). New York: International Universities Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self- efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84,191–215.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self -efficacy in changing societies. (pp. 1–45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beyers, W. & Goossens, L. (1999). Emotional autonomy, psychosocial adjustment and parenting: interactions, moderating and mediating effects. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 753–769.
  • Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vassant, I. & Moors, E. (2003). A Structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, (5), 351–365.
  • Blos P (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 162–186.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. (Yedinci Baskı). Ankara: PEGEM A Yayıncılık.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000).The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
  • Deniz, M. (2010, May). An adaptation of the emotional autonomy scale to the Turkish adolescents. A construct validity study. The 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence. Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lirsel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 4, 403–422.
  • Kamii, C. (1991). Toward autonomy: The importance of critical thinking and choice making. School Psychology Review, 20 (4), 382–388.
  • Kenyon, D. B., & Koerner, S. S. (2008). Post-divorce maternal disclosure and the father-adolescent relationship: Adolescent emotional autonomy and inter-reactivity as moderators. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 791-808.
  • Lamborn, S.D. & Steinberg, L. (1993). Emotional autonomy redux: Revisiting Ryan and Lynch. Child Development, 64, 483–499.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1 (2), 130–149.
  • Mahler, M. (1963). Thoughts about Development and Individuation. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 18,307–24.
  • Noom, M. (1999). Adolescent autonomy: Characteristics and correlates. Delft: Eburen Publishers.
  • Noom, M., Dekovic, M., & Meeus, W. (2001). Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(5), 577-595.
  • Ryan, R. M. & Lynch, J. H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 340–356.
  • Schmitz, M.F., & Baer, J. C. (2001).The vicissitudes of measurement: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Emotional Autonomy Scale. Child Development, 72 (1), 207–219.
  • Schwartz, H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48 (1), 23–47.
  • Steinberg, L. (2007). Ergenlik (Çev. Editörü: Çok, F.) Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Steinberg, L. & Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841- 851.
  • Tabachnick B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. (Fourth Edition). MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
  • Youniss, J. and Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescents’ relations with mothers, fathers, and friends. Chicago: Chicago University Press.