Dezavantajlı Yüksek Başarılı Öğrencilerin Okul ve Öğrenci Düzeyinde Matematik Başarılarını Etkileyen Değişkenlerin İncelenmesi

Araştırmanın temel amacı, düşük sosyo-ekonomik statüye sahip olmalarına rağmen yüksek başarı gösteren Türk öğrencilerinöğrenme fırsatları, okul iklimi ve okul kaynakları değişkenleri birlikte ele alındığında matematik başarılarını nasıl etkilediğinihiyerarşik lineer model (HLM) kullanarak incelemektir. Son zamanlarda yapılan çalışmalar sosyo-ekonomik açıdan dezavantajlı geçmişe sahip olan öğrencilerin dezavantajlı sosyoekonomik koşullara sahip akranlarına göre daha üst düzeyde başarı gösterdiğini belirtmektedir. Bu bakımdan düşük sosyoekonomik statüye sahip öğrencilerin başarılarını yordayan değişkenlerin belirlenmesi önem kazanmaktadır. Araştırmada düşük sosyo-ekonomik statüye sahip olmalarına rağmen yüksek başarı gösteren öğrencilerin temel özellikleri alan yazındaki çalışmalar ile ortaya çıkarılmış; hem okul hem öğrenci düzeyinde genel olarak başarı düzeylerine etki eden faktörler üzerinden teorik bir model kurulmuştur. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu PISA 2012 Türkiye örneklemindeki 317 dezavantajlı yüksek başarılı öğrenci olarak tanımlanan öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğrenci düzeyinde Okuldaki Uygulamalı Matematik Görevlerinde Tecrübe ve Matematik Sınıfındaki Öğretmen Desteği değişkenlerinin; okul düzeyinde ise Okulun Eğitsel Kaynaklarının Kalitesi ve Öğrenciyle İlişkili Okul İklimini Etkileyen Faktörler değişkenlerinin düşük sosyo-ekonomik statüye sahip başarılı öğrencilerin ortalama matematik puanlarına katkılarının anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Kurulan modeller incelendiğinde hem okul hem de öğrenci düzeyinde değişkenleri içeren modeldeki Okuldaki Uygulamalı Matematik Görevlerinde Tecrübe, Okulun Eğitsel Kaynaklarının Kalitesi ve Öğrenciyle İlişkili Okul İklimini Etkileyen Faktörler değişkenlerinin okullar arasındaki varyansın %44’ünü açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada ayrıca öğrenci düzeyindeki değişkenlerin kısmen anlamlı etkilerinin olduğu görülmüştür.

Investigation of the Variables Affecting the Math Achievement of Resilient Students at School and Student Level

The main aim of the study is to investigate how the opportunity to learn, school climate, and school resources, when they are considered as variables together, affect the Math achievement of resilient Turkish students by using a Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM). Recent studies state that resilient students are achieving higher than their peers who have low socio-economic status. Therefore, it is important to find out the variables which affect the achievement of students who have a low socio-economic status. In the study, the main characteristics of resilient students are revealed through a literature review in this field; and a model is formed through the factors which affect achievement levels generally at both school and student levels. The study group includes 317 students who are defined as resilient in the PISA 2012 Turkish sample. According to the results of the study, at student level, the variables of Experience with Applied Mathematical Tasks and Mathematics Teaching; and at school level, the variables of Quality of School Educational Resources and Student-related Factors Affecting School Climate are found to be effective in the mean math achievement of resilient students. When the models are examined, in the one including both school and student level variables together, it is determined that the variables of Experience with Applied Mathematical Tasks, Quality of School Educational Resources and Student-related Factors Affecting School Climate explain 44% of the variability between schools. Besides, it can be seen in the study that the variables at student level have partially meaningful effects.

___

  • Wyner, J. S., Bridgeland, J. M. ve Dilulio, J. J. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Lansdowne, VA: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
  • Wolin, S. J. ve Wolin, S. (1993). The resilient self: How survivors of troubled families arise above adversity. New York, NY: Villard.
  • Williams, J. M. ve Bryan, J. (2013). Overcoming adversity: High-achieving African American youth’s perspectives on educational resilience. Journal of Counseling and Development, 91(3), 290-299. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00097.x
  • Werner, E. ve Smith, R. (1998). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: Adams Bannister Cox.
  • Waxman, H. C., Gray, J. P. ve Padron, Y. N. (2003). Review of research on educational resilience. Center for research on education, diversity & excellence. University of Caifornia, Berkeley.
  • Waxman, H. C. ve Huang, S. L. (1996). Motivation and learning environment differences in inner-city middle school students. Journal of Educational Research, 90(2), 93-102. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9944450
  • Wang, M. T. ve Degol, J. L. (2015). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact of student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 1-38.
  • Wang, M. C., HaerteL, G. D. ve Walberg, H. J. (1994). Educational resilience in inner cities. M. C. Wang ve E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Educational resilience in inner-citv America: Challenges and prospects içinde (s. 45-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Wang, M. C. ve Gordon, E. W. (1994). Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wang, M. C. (1997). Next steps in inner-city education: Focusing on resilience development and learning success. Education and Urban Society, 29(3), 255-276. doi:10.1177/0013124597029003002
  • van Buuren, S. ve Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1-67. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03
  • UNESCO. (2006). EFA global monitoring report 2007: Strong foundations –early childhood care and education. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S. ve Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 357-385.
  • Shumow, L., Vandell, D. L. ve Posner, J. (1999). Risk and resilience in the urban neighborhood: Predictors of academic performance among low-incpme elementary school children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(2), 309-331.
  • Shindler, J., Jones, A., Taylor, C. ve Cadenas, H. (2004). Does seeking to create a better classroom climate lead to student success and/or improved teaching? Examining the relationship between pedagogical choices and classroom climate in urban secondary schools. AERA toplantısında sunulmuş bildiri, San Diego.
  • Sagor, R. (1996). Building resiliency in students. Educational Leadership, 54(1), 38-43.
  • Rutter, M. (2006). Implications of resilience conceptsfor scientific understanding. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 1094(1), 1-12.
  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A. ve Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
  • Reis, M. S., Colbert, R. D. ve Hebert, T. P. (2005). Understanding resilience in diverse, talanted students in an urban high school. Roeper Review, 27(2), 110-120. doi:10.1080/02783190509554299
  • Raudenbush, S. W. ve Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2. bs.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pulley, M. L. ve Wakefield, M. (2001). Building resiliency: How to thrive in times of change. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
  • Padron, Y. N., Waxman, H. C. ve Lee, Y. (2012). Classroom learning environment differences between resilient, average, and nonresilient middle school students in reading. Education and Urban Society, 46(2), 264-283. doi:10.1177/0013124512446217
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every students the chance to succeed (Volume II). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201132-en
  • OECD. (2011). Against the odds: Disadvantaged students who succeed in school. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264090873-en
  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background – Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264091504-en
  • Norton, M. S. (2008). Human resources administration for educational leaders. New York: Sage.
  • Mothner, H D. (1995). A personal assessment instrument for understanding student resiliency. Education, 116(1), 83-86.
  • Morrison, G. P. (2001). Factors that affect the lives of resilient students: lessons for educational leaders from resilient students (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville.
  • Morales, E. E. (2014). Learning from success: How original research on academic resilience informs what college faculty can do to increase the retention of low socioeconomic status students. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 92-102. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p92
  • McMillan, J. H., & Reed, D. F. (2010) At-Risk Students and Resiliency: Factors Contributing to Academic Success, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 67(3), 137-140, doi:10.1080/00098655.1994.9956043
  • McCoy, L. P. (2005). Effect of demographic and personal variables on achievement in eighth grade algebra. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 131-135.
  • Maughan, B. (1988). School experiences as risk/protective factors. M. Rutter (Ed.), Studies of psychosocial risk içinde (s. 200-220). New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. American Psyshologist, 56(3), 227-238.
  • Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D. ve Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00164
  • Loukas, A. ve Robinson, S. (2004). Examining the moderating role of perceived school climate in early adolescent adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 14(2). doi:10.1111/j.1532- 7795.2004.01402004.x
  • LeFalle, D. (2010). The role of personel strengths in academic success: Views and voices of resilient community colleges students (Yayımlanmamş doktora tezi). California Institute of Integral Studies, California.
  • Lee, V. E., Winfield, L. F. ve Wilson, T. C. (1991). Academic behaviors among high-achieving AfricanAmerican students. Education and Urban Society, 24(1), 65-86.
  • Lee, T., Cornell, D., Gregory, A. ve Fan, X. (2011). High suspension schools and dropout rates for black and white students. Education and Treatmet of Children, 34, 167-192.
  • Lacour, M. ve Tissington, L. D. (2011). The effects of poverty on academic achievement. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 522-527.
  • Konstantopoulos, S. (2005). Trends of school effects on student achievement: Evidence from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92. Teachers College Record, 108, 2550-2581.
  • Kober, N. (2001). It takes more than testing: Closing the achievement gap. ERIC veritabanından erişildi (ED454358).
  • Kitano, M. K. ve Lewis, R. B. (2005). Resilience and coping: Implications for gifted children and youth at risk. The Roeper Review, 27(4), 200-215. doi:10.1080/02783190509554319
  • Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kaplan, D. ve Su, D. (2016). On Matrix sampling and imputation of context questionnaires with implications for the generation of plausible values in large-scale assessments. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(1), 57-80. doi:10.3102/1076998615622221
  • Johnson, B. (2008). Teacher-student relationship which promote resilience at school: A micro-level analysis of students’ views. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 36(4), 385-398. doi:10.1080/03069880802364528
  • Hoy, W. ve Hannum, J. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 290-311. doi:10.1177/0013161X97033003003
  • Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L. ve Tabata, L. N. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. (2. bs.). New York: Routledge.
  • Hanushek, E. A. ve Woessmann, L. (2010). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. National Bureau of National research. Technical Report No: 15949. Bonn: IZA. doi:10.3386/w15949
  • Grotberg, E. H. (2001). Resilience programs for children in disaster. Ambulatory Child Health, 7(2), 75-83. doi:10.1046/j.1467-0658.2001.00114.x
  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D., Fan, X., Sheras, P., Shih, T. ve Huang, F. (2010). Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower student bullying and victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 483-496.
  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V. ve Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396. doi:10.3102/00346543066003361
  • Grassi, J. (2014). The resilient students: A collective case study of four students who have remained successful in literacy (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Binghamton University, New York.
  • Gilligan, R. (2007). Adversity, resilience and the educational progress of young people in public care. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 12(2), 135-145. doi:10.1080/13632750701315631
  • Geary, P. A. (1988). "Defying the odds?": Academic success among at- risk minority teenagers in an urban high school (Report No. UD-026-258). ERIC veritabanından erişildi (ED296055).
  • Gary, M. N. (1999). The measurement of socio economic status and socialclass in the LSAY Project Technical Paper No: 14. LSAY Technical Reports. ACER. http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=lsay_technical adresinden erişildi.
  • Fuller, A. (1998). From surviving to thriving: Promoting mental health in young people. Camberwell: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
  • Freiberg, H. J., Driscoll, A. ve Knights, S. (1999). School climate. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
  • Fraenkel, J. R. ve Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGrawHill.
  • Finn, J. D. ve Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221-234. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.2.221
  • Evans-Winters, V. (2005). Teaching black girls: Resiliency in urban classrooms. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Erberber, E., Stephens, M., Mamedova, S., Ferguson, S. ve Kroeger, T. (2015). Socioeconomically disadvantaged students who are academically successful: Examining academic resilience crossnationally. IEA’s Policy Brief Series, No. 5, Amsterdam, IEA. http://www.iea.nl/policy_briefs.html adresinden erişildi.
  • Cunningham, P. M. (2006). High-poverty schools that beat the odds. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 382-385. doi:10.1598/RT.60.4.9
  • Condly, S. J. (2006). Resilience in children: A review of literature with implications for education. Urban Education, 41(3), 211-236. doi:10.1177/0042085906287902
  • Cohen, J. ve Geier, V. (2010). School climate research summary-2009. A school climate brief. New York: National School Climate Center.
  • Cohen, J. (2013). Creating a positive school climate: A foundation for resilience. S. Goldstein ve R. B. Brooks (Ed.), Handbook of resilience in children. Springer Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3661- 4_24.
  • Coburn, J. ve Nelson, S. (1989). Teachers do make a difference: What Indian graduates say about their school experience (Report No. RC-017-103). Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. ERIC veritabanından erişildi (ED306071).
  • Chung, H. F. (2008). Resiliency and character strengths among college students (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). The University of Arizona, Tucson.
  • Catterall, J. S. (1998). Risk and resilience in student transitions to high school. American Journal of Education, 106(2), 302-333.
  • Byfield, C. (2008). Black boys can make it: How they overcome the obstacles to university in the UK and USA. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books Ltd.
  • Burns, E. T. (1996). From risk to resilience: A journey with hearth for our children, our future. Dallas, Marco Polo Publishers.
  • Brennan, M. A. (2008). Conceptualizing resiliency: An interactional perspective for community and youth development. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 55-64. doi:10.1080/13575270701733732
  • Borman, G. D. ve Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. Elementary School Journal, 104, 177-195.
  • Benard, B. (1996). Fostering resiliency in urban schools. B. Williams (Ed.), Choosing the achievement gap: A vision for changing beliefs and practice içinde (s. 96-119). Alexandria, VA: Associate for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Benard, B. (1993). Fostering resiliency in kids. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 44-48.
  • Benard, B. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. Portland, OR: Western Center for Drug-Free Schools and Communities.
  • Bartley, M. (2006). Capability and resilience: Beating the odds. London: ESRC Economic & Social Research Council. 20 Ocak 2017 tarihinde http://www.ucl.ac.uk/capabilityandresilience/beatingtheoddsbook.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Astor, R. A., De Pedro, K. T., Gireath, T. D., Esqueda, M. C. ve Benbenishty, R. (2013). The promotional role of school and community context for military students. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16(3), 233-244.
  • Adeogun, A. A. ve Olisaemeka Blessing, U. (2011). Influence of school climate on students’s achievement and teachers’productivity for sustainable development. US-China Education Review, 8(4), 552-557.
Eğitim ve Bilim-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1337
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Türk Eğitim Derneği (TED) İktisadi İşletmesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İlkokul Dördüncü Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okuma Kaygıları, Akıcılıkları, Motivasyonları ve Okuduğunu Anlamaları Arasındaki İlişkiler

Ahmet YAMAÇ, Zuhal ÇELİKTÜRK SEZGİN

Öğretmenlerin Bireysel ve Birlikte Öğrenme Tercihlerini Etkileyen Özellikleri

Kamil YILDIRIM

Öğretme Yaklaşımları Envanterinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması ve Türkiye’deki Öğretim Elemanlarının Öğretme Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi

Ufuk AKBAŞ, Erdem AKSOY, Gölge SEFEROĞLU

Görme Engelli Öğrencilere Yönelik Bilgisayar Ortamında Bireye Uyarlanmış Test Tasarımı

Ömer KUTLU, Selma ŞENEL

Danimarka'da Türkçe-Danca Konuşan Öğrencilerin Dil Baskınlığının İki Dillilik Temelinde İncelenmesi

Necati DEMİR, Gülşat BİCAN

Öğretmenlerin Radyasyon Kavramına Karşı Tutum ve Bilgilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Paşa YALÇIN, Sema ALTUN YALÇIN, Tuğba KARENOĞULLARI

Ortaokulda Ödül Bağımlılığı-Ceza Hassasiyeti ve Ödül Bağımlılığı-Okul Tükenmişliği Arasındaki Yordayıcı İlişkiler

Ayşe AYPAY

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Umut Düzeylerinin, Kaygı, Depresyon ve Mükemmeliyetçilik Açısından İncelenmesi

Tuncay ORAL, Ali KARABABA, Coşkun ARSLAN

Pedagojik Hoşnutsuzluk Yaşayan Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenleri İçin Araştırma-İncelemeye Dayalı Öğretime Yönelik Reform Odaklı Hizmet-içi Öğretmen Eğitimi Girişimlerinin Değeri: Bir Beklenti-Değer Bakış Açısı

Mustafa Serdar KÖKSAL, Sherry SOUTHERLAND

İş Birlikli Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Türkiye’deki Öğrencilerin Türkçe Derslerindeki Akademik Başarılarına Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Ömer Faruk TAVŞANLI, Abdullah KALDIRIM