Conflict areas and conflict resolution strategies of college students with friends and romantic partners

Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin arkadaş ve romantik partnerleri ile yaşadıkları ana çatışma konularını belirlemek ve kullandıkları çatışma çözme stratejilerinin ilişki türüne göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmanın örneklemi, Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik (PDR) bölümünde okumakta olan gönüllü 19 lisans öğrencisinden oluşmuştur. Veriler, yapılandırılmamış anı yazımı yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. İki hafta boyunca tutulan anılar, içerik çözümlemesi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın ilk amacına ilişkin olarak, arkadaş ile yaşanılan çatışmalarda en yüksek oranda akademik anlaşmazlık; romantic partner ile kıskançlık ana çatışma konusu olarak bulunmuştur. İkinci amaca ilişkin olarak ise, olumlu çatışma çözümleme stratejilerinin romantik partnerle yaşanan çatışmalarda sıklıkla kullanıldığı bulunmuştur. Bulgular, çatışma çözme ve sosyal değişim kuramları bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

Arkadaşlık ve romantik ilişkilerinde üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşadıkları çatışmalar ve kullandıkları çatışma çözme stratejileri

The purpose of this study is to explore the major conflicts college students experience with their friends and romantic partners, and to investigate whether conflict resolution strategies vary as a function of the relationships in which the conflicts occur. A total of 19 undergraduate students majoring in Psychological Counseling and Guidance (PCG) volunteered to take part in the study. Data was collected using the unstructured diary format method. Content analysis is used to examine two-week diary entries. Regarding the first aim of this study, disagreements in academic work received the highest percentage between friends. In addition, jealousy was the highest conflicting theme between romantic partners. Regarding the second aim of this study, findings suggested that participants used constructive strategies more frequently with romantic partners than with friends. The results were discussed using the conflict resolution and social exchange theory.

___

  • Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of friendships. Journal of Social and Personality Relationships, 1, 211-237.
  • Atıcı, M. (2007). Primary school students’ conflict resolution strategies in Turkey. International Journal for the Advancement Counseling, 29, 83-95.
  • Black, K. A. (2002). Associations between adolescent-mother and adolescent-best friend interactions. Adolescence, 37(146), 235-253.
  • Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1970). The fifth achievement. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 6, 413-426.
  • Burgoon, M., Dillard, J., Doran, N., & Miller, M. (1982). Cultural and situational influences on the process of persuasive strategy selection. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 6, 85-100.
  • Carruthers, W., & Sweeney, B. (1996). Conflict resolution: An examination of the research literature and a model for program evaluation. School Counselor, 44(1), 5-18.
  • Clark, M. S., & Grote, N. K. (1998). Why aren’t indices of relationship costs away negatively related to indices of relationship quality? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 2-7.
  • Clark, M. S., & Taraband, C (1991). Reactions to and willingness to express emotion in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 324-336.
  • Creasey, G., Kershaw, K., & Boston, A. (1999). Conflict management with friends and romantic partners: The role of attachment and negative mood regulation expectancies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(5), 523-541.
  • Deutsch, M. (1994). Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research. Journal of Social Issues, 50(1), 13-32.
  • Deutsch, M. (1991). Educating for a peaceful world. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychological Association in San Francisco.
  • Deutsch, M (1994). Constructive conflict resolution: Principles, training, and research. Journal of Social Issues, 50(1), 13-32.
  • Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Furman, W. & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103-115.
  • Furman, W., & Wehner, E. (1994). Romantic views: Towards a theory of adolescent romantic relationships. In Montemayor, R. (ed), Advances in Adolescent Development, Vol.6: Personal Relationships in Adolescence. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 168-195.
  • Graneheim U.H. & Lundman B. (2004.) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24, 105–112.
  • Graziano, W. G. (1987). Lost in thought at the choice point: Cognition, context, and equity. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.). Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical and policy perspectives, 266-294. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1394- 1408.
  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
  • Greenberg J., & Folger, R. (1988). Controversial issues in social research methods. New York: Springer- Verlag.
  • Gustafsson, H., Hassmén, P., Kenttä, G., & Johansson, M. (2008). A qualitative analysis of burnout in elite Swedish athletes. Psychology of Sports and Exercise, 9(6), November, 800-816.
  • Hayes, R. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909-924.
  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
  • Hirokawa, R., & Miyahara, A. (1986). A comparison of influence strategies utilized by managers in American and Japanese organizations. Communication Quarterly, 34, 250-265.
  • Itoi, R., Ohbuchi, K., & Fukuno, M. (1996). A cross-cultural study of preference of accounts: Relationship closeness, harm severity, and motives of account making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 913-934.
  • Jensen-Campbell , L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2000). Beyond the school yard: Relationships as moderators of daily interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 923-935.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1994). Effects of conflict resolution training on elementary school students. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(6), 803-817.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Conflict resolution and peer mediation programs in elementary and secondary schools: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 459-506.
  • Kıralp, Y., Dincyurek, S., & Beidoglu, M. (2009). Conflict Resolution Strategies of Turkish Cypriot College Students’ in Different Relationships: Friend, close friend, romantic partner, mother, and father. Unpublished.
  • Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (1994). Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 177-209.
  • Levinger, G. (1983). Development and change. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christiansen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson. Close relationships (pp.315-359). San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ohbuchi, K., Fukushima ,O., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Cultural vaalues in conflict management: Goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactical decision. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology,30(1), 51-71.
  • Ohbuchi, K., & Takahashi, Y. (1994). Cultural styles of conflict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1345-1366.
  • Owens, L., Daly, A., & Slee, P. (2005). Sex and age differences in victimization and conflict resolution among adolescents in a South Australian school. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 1-12.
  • Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interactions with the Rochester Interaction Record. In M. P.Z. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, 24, 269-318). New York: Academic Press.
  • Richey, M., & Richey, H. (1980). The significance of best-friend relationship in adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 536-540.
  • Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation process in close relationship: Theory, and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53-78.
  • Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Samter, W., & Cupach, W. (1998). Friendly fire: Topical variations in conflict among same-and cross- sex friends. Communication Studies, 49, 121-138.
  • Shanz, C. U., & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.). (1992). Conflicts in child and adolescent development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sheets, V., & Lugar, R. (2005). Friendship and gender in Russia and the United States. Sex Roles, 52, 131-141.
  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage Publication.
  • Sullivan,H. S. (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. Norton. New York.
  • Symon, G. (2004). Qualitative Research Diaries. In Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (ed.). Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, 98-113.
  • Tesch R. (1990) Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Palmer PA, Bristol.
  • Tezer, E., & Demir, A. (2001). Conflict behaviors toward same-sex and opposite- sex peers among male and female late adolescents. Adolescence, 36(143), 1-6.
  • Theberge, S. K., & Karan, O. C. (2004). Six factors inhibiting the use of peer mediation in a junior high school. Professional School Counseling, 7(4), 283-290.
  • Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Trubisky, P., Ting-Toomey, S.,&Lin, S.-L. (1991). The influence of individualism-collectivism and self- monitoring on conflict styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relation, 15, 65-84.
  • Turnuklu, A., & Sahin, I. (2002). İlköğretim Okullarında Öğrenci Çatışmaları ve Öğretmenlerin Bu Çatışmalarla Başa Çıkma Stratejileri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 8(30), 283- 302. (Students’ conflicts and teachers’ strategies of resolving these conflicts in primary schools. Educational Management in Theory and Practice).
  • Turnuklu, A. (2004). Examining Interpersonal conflicts among middle school students in Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 9(1), 87-100.
  • Vera, E. M., Shin, R. Q., Montgomery, G. P., Mildner, C., & Speight, S. L. (2004). Conflict resolution styles, self-efficacy, self-control, and future orientation of urban adolescents. Professional School Counseling, 8(1), 73-80.
  • Weinstock, J. S., & Bond, L. A. (2000). Conceptions of conflict in close friendships and ways of knowing among young college women: A developmental framework. Journal of Social and Relationship, 17, 687-695.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Simsek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin: Ankara.