Amaç: İçme Nedenleri Ölçeği (İNÖ-G) 20 maddeden oluşan ve dört kategoride içme nedenlerini (sosyal, başetme, etkiyi arttırma, çevreye uyma) değerlendiren bir ölçektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı doğrultusunda, İNÖ-G Türkçe tercümesinin yatarak tedavi gören erkek alkol bağımlılarında geçerlik, güvenirlik ve faktöryel yapısı değerlendirilmiştir. Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamına, Bakırköy Ruh Sağlığı ve Sinir Hastalıkları Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, AMATEM (Alkol Madde Araştırma Tedavi ve Eğitim Merkezi) İstanbul’da, Ağustos 2008 ile Mart 2009 tarihleri arasında, ardışık yatarak tedavi gören 155 erkek alkol bağımlısı hasta alınmıştır. Hastalara İNÖ-G, Obsesif Kompulsif İçme Ölçeği (OKİÖ) ve Michigan Alkol Tarama Testi (MATT) uygulanmıştır. İNÖ-G’nin Türkçe versiyonunun iç güvenirliği Cronbach Alfa testi ve geçerlilik araştırması ise OKİÖ ve MAST kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Ölçeğin 20 maddelik çözümlü Türkçe şekli orjinal ölçekle uyumlu bulunmuştur. Alkol bağımlılarında iç güvenirlik katsayısı (Cronbach alfa) “Çevreye uyma” için 0.794, “Sosyal” için 0.849, “Başetme” için 0.843 ve “Etkiyi arttırma” için 0.789 idi. Her madde için düzeltilmiş madde – toplam korelasyon değerleri 0.652 ile 0.848 arasındaydı (p
Objective: Drinking Motives Questionnaire (DMQ-R) is a 20-item questionnaire that assesses four categories of drinking motives (social, coping, enhancement, and conformity). In the aim of this study, the reliability and validity and factorial structure of the Turkish translation of the DMQ-R in male alcohol dependent inpatients were determined. Method: The study was conducted with hospitalized patients between August 2008 and March 2009 in Bakirkoy State Hospital for Mental Health and Neurological Disorders, AMATEM (Alcohol and Drug Research, Treatment and Education Center) in Istanbul. Participants were 155 consecutively admitted male alcohol dependents. Patients were investigated with the DMQ-R, the Obsessive–Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and the Michigan Alcohol Screening Test (MAST). The internal consistency of the Turkish version of DMQ-R was evaluated by the Cronbach’s Alpha test, and for validity investigation the OCDS and the MAST was used. Results: The Turkish version of the scale with 20 item questionnaire was found to be compatible with the original scale. In alcohol dependents, the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.794 for “Conformity” scale, 0.849 for “Social” scale, 0.843 for “Coping” and 0.789 for “Enhancement”. For each of the items, the corrected item-total correlation values were between 0.652 and 0.848 (p<0.001). Test–retest correlations were 0.602 for “Conformity” scale, 0.549 for “Social” scale, 0.657 for “Coping” and 0.637 for “Enhancement”. Four subscales of the DMQ-R, total score of the OCDS and the MAST were correlated significantly in the degree of p<0.001, other than “social” motives, which was correlated significantly in the degree of p<0.01. Conclusions: Results which were obtained in this study suggests that the Turkish version of the DMQ-R was reliable and valid for alcohol dependent inpatients.
1. Cooper ML. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychol Assess 1994; 6:117-128.
2. Cox WM, Klinger E. A motivational model of alcohol use. J Abnorm Psychol 1988; 97:168–180.
3. Carpenter KM, Hasin DS. Reasons for drinking alcohol: relationships with DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses and alcohol consumption in a community sample. Psychol Addict Behav 1998; 12:168–184.
4. Kuntsche E, Knibbe R, Gmel G, Engels R. Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. Clin Psychol Rev 2005; 25:841-861.
5. Cooper ML, Frone MR, Russell M, Mudar P. Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: a motivational model of alcohol use. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995; 69:990-1005.
6. Cronin C. Reasons for drinking versus outcome expectancies in the prediction of college student drinking. Subst Use Misuse 1997; 32:1287-1311.
7. Catanzaro SJ, Laurent J. Perceived family support, negative mood regulation expectancies, coping, and adolescent alcohol use: evidence of mediation and moderation effects. Addict Behav 2004; 29:1779–1797.
8. Galen LW, Henderson MJ, Coovert MD. Alcohol expectancies and motives in a substance abusing male treatment sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 62:205-214.
9. Farber PD, Khavari KA, Douglass FM. A factor analytic study of reasons for drinking: empirical validation of positive and negative reinforecement dimensions. J Consult Clin Psychol 1980; 48:780-781.
10. Cooper ML, Russell M, Skinner JB, Frone MR, Mudar P. Stress and alcohol use: moderating effects of gender, coping, and alcohol expectancies. J Abnorm Psychol 1992; 101:139-152.
11. Kuntsche E, Knibbe R, Gmel G, Engels R. Replication and validation of the Drinking Motive Questionnaire Revised (DMQR, Cooper, 1994) among adolescents in Switzerland. Eur Addict Res 2006; 12:161-168.
12. MacLean MG, Lecci L. A comparison of models of drinking motives in a university sample. Psychol Addict Behav 2000; 14:83-87.
13. Urbán R, Kökönyei G, Demetrovics Z. Alcohol outcome expectancies and drinking motives mediate the association between sensation seeking and alcohol use among adolescents. Addict Behav 2008; 33:1344-1352.
14. Kuntsche E, Stewart SH, Cooper ML. How stable is the motive-alcohol use link? A cross-national validation of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire Revised among adolescents from Switzerland, Canada, and the United States. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2008; 69:388-396.
15. Nagoshi CT, Nakata T, Sasano K, Wood MD. Alcohol norms, expectancies, and reasons for drinking and alcohol use in a U.S. versus a Japanese college sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1994; 18:671-678.
16. Gire JT. A cross-national study of motives for drinking alcohol. Subst Use Misuse 2002; 37:215-223.
17. Theakston JA, Stewart SH, Dawson MY, Knowlden-Loewen SAB, Lehman DR. Big-Five personality domains predict drinking motives. Pers Individ Dif 2004; 37: 971-984.
18. Kassel JD, Jackson SI, Unrod M. Generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation and problem drinking among college students. J Stud Alcohol 2000; 61:332-340.
19. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Stuructured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), Clinical Version. Washington D.C. and London: American Psychiatric Press Inc., 1997.
20. Çorapçıoğlu A, Aydemir O, Yıldız M, Esen A, Köroglu E. DSMIV Eksen I Bozuklukları (SCID-I) için Yapılandırılmış Klinik Görüşme, Klinik Versiyon. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği, 1999.
21. Anton RF, Moak DH, Latham P. The obsessive compulsive drinking scale: A self-rated instrument for the quantification of thoughts about alcohol and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1995; 19:92–99.
22. Anton RF, Moak DH, Latham P. The obsessive compulsive drinking scale: A new method of assessing outcome in alcoholism treatment studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:225–231.
23. Anton RF. Obsessive–compulsive aspects of craving: Development of the obsessive compulsive drinking scale. Addiction 2000; 95 (Suppl.2):211-217.
24. Moak DH, Anton RF, Latham PK. Further validation of the Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS). Relationship to alcoholism severity. Am J Addict 1998; 7:14-23.
25. Evren C, Celik S, Evren B, Aksoy R. Validation study of the Turkish version of the Obsessive–Compulsive Drinking Scale in male alcohol dependent inpatients. Düşünen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences (In press).
26. Gibbs LE. Validity and reliability of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: A review. Drug Alcohol Depend 1985; 12:279-285.
27. Coskunol H, Bagdiken I, Sorias S, Saygili R. Michigan Alkolizm Tarama Testinin Geçerliliği. Ege Tıp Dergisi 1995; 34:15-18.
28. Derogatis LR. SCL-90: Administration, Scoring and Procedure Manual-II for the revised version, Tawson, Clinical Psychometric Research, 1983.
29. Dag I. Belirti tarama listesinin (SCL-90-R) üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 1991; 2:5-12.
30. Figlie NB, Dunn J, Laranjeira R. Motivation for change in alcohol dependent outpatients from Brazil. Addict Behav 2005; 30:159-165.
31. Simons J, Correia CJ, Carey KB. A comparison of motives for marijuana and alcohol use among experienced users. Addict Behav 2000; 25:153-160.
32. Stewart SH, Samoluk SB, Conrod PJ, Pihl RO, Dongier M. Psychometric evaluation of the short form inventory of drinking situations (IDS-42) in a community-recruited sample of substance-abusing women. J Subst Abuse 2000; 11:305-321.
33. Kuntsche E, Knibbe R, Engels R, Gmel G. Bullying and fighting among adolescents-do drinking motives and alcohol use matter? Addict Behav 2007; 32:3131-3135.
34. Stewart SH, Zeitlin SB. Anxiety sensitivity and alcohol use motives. J Anxiety Disord 1995; 9:229-240.
35. Comeau N, Stewart SH, Loba P. The relations of trait anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and sensation seeking to adolescents’ motivations for alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Addict Behav 2001; 26:803-825.
36. Stewart SH, Zvolensky MJ, Eifert GH. The relations of anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and alexithymic coping to young adults’ motivations for drinking. Behav Modif 2002; 26:274-296.
37. Stewart SH, Devine H. Relations between personality and drinking motives in young adults. Pers Individ Dif 2000; 29:495-511.
38. Verheul R, Van Den Brink W, Geerlings P. A three-pathway psychobiological model of craving for alcohol. Alcohol Alcohol 1999; 34:197–222.
39. Mann K, Kiefer F, Smolka M, Gann H, Wellek S, Heinz A; PREDICT Study Research Team. Searching for responders to acamprosate and naltrexone in alcoholism treatment: rationale and design of the PREDICT study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2009; 33:674-683.
40. Stewart SH, Pihl RO, Conrod PJ, Dongier M. Functional associations among trauma, PTSD, and substance-related disorders. Addict Behav 1998; 23:797-812.
41. Kaysen D, Dillworth TM, Simpson T, Waldrop A, Larimer ME, Resick PA. Domestic violence and alcohol use: traumarelated symptoms and motives for drinking. Addict Behav 2007; 32:1272-1283.
42. Grayson CE, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Motives to drink as mediators between childhood sexual assault and alcohol problems in adult women. J Trauma Stress 2005; 18:137-145.