Ebru TURHAN

12990

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN ORTAK GÜVENLİK VE SAVUNMA POLİTİKASI’NIN SAVUNMA BOYUTUNUN GELİŞİMİNDE PESCO’NUN ROLÜ: FIRSATLAR VE ZORLUKLAR

Avrupa’da siyasi ve ekonomik bütünleşmeye yönelik ilk çabalarla eş zamanlı olarak bir güvenlik ve savunma politikası oluşturma girişimleri gözlemlenmiştir. 1999 Helsinki AB Zirvesi’nde açıklanan Avrupa Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası (AGSP) ve 2009’da Lizbon Antlaşması ile hayata geçirilen Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası (OGSP), uzun bir süre güvenlik politikalarına ağırlık verilmesinin ve dolayısıyla savunma boyutunda bütünleşmenin ihmal edilmesinin önüne geçememiştir. 2017’de hayata geçirilen “Daimi Yapılandırılmış İşbirliği” (PESCO) ile AB’nin savunma aktörlüğünün etkinleştirilmesi hedeflenmektedir. Çalışmada, PESCO’nun OGSP’nin savunma boyutunda gerçekleşmesi amaçlanan bütünleşmeye ve AB’nin savunma kabiliyetlerinin gelişimine katkısı, bu süreçte oluşan zorluklar ve fırsatlar, nedensel mekanizmalara odaklanan süreç takibi yöntemiyle analiz edilmektedir. 
Anahtar Kelimeler:

PESCO, Daimi Yapılandırılmış İşbirliği, Avrupa Birliği, Güvenlik, Savunma, Bütünleşme

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENSE POLICY’S SECURITY DIMENSION AND PESCO’S ROLE: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

In tandem with initial of efforts for political and economic integration in Europe, attempts to form a common security and defense policy were observed. The 1999 European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) and the 2009 Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP) long focused on common security policies neglecting much-needed integration in the defense ‘sphere’. The Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) launched in 2017 aims at fostering the EU’s defense actorness. This study examines PESCO’s contribution to integration efforts in CSDP’s defense dimension and the development of the EU’s defense capabilities, and the mechanism’s constraints and potential drawing on process tracing method.
Keywords:

PESCO, Permanent Structured Cooperation, European Union, Security, Defense, Integration,

PDF

___

  • Auswaertiges Amt (2016). A strong Europe in a world of uncertainties. By Jean-Marc Ayrault and Frank-Walter Steinmeier. 27 Haziran 2016. https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/aussenpolitik/europa/160624-bm-am-fra-st/281702 (01.06.2019).
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S. ve Marrone, A. (2018). PESCO and Security Cooperation Between the EU and Turkey. Global Turkey in Europe Working Paper No:19.
  • Barigazzi, J. (2018). UK and US will be allowed to join some EU military projects. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/pesco-military-uk-and-us-will-be-allowed-to-join-some-eu-military-projects/ (01.06.2019).
  • Bendiek, A., Kempin, R. ve von Ondarza, N. (2018). Qualified Majority Voting and Flexible Integration for a More Effective CFSP?, SWP Comment, 25 Haziran 2018. Bennett, A. ve Checkel, J. T. (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Billon-Galland, A. ve Quencez, M. (2017). Can France and Germany Make PESCO Work as a Process Toward EU Defense?. GMF Policy Brief No: 033.
  • Biscop, S. (2018). European Defence: Give PESCO a Chance. Survival, 60 (3), 161-180.
  • Blockmans, S. (2018). The EU’s Modular Approach to Defence Integration: an Inclusive, Ambitious and Legally Binding PESCO?. Common Market Law Review, 55 (6), 1785-1826.
  • Blockmans, S. ve Wessel, R. A. (2009). The European Union and Crisis Management: Will the Lisbon Treaty Make the EU More Effective?. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, (14) 2, 265-308.
  • Bruxelles2Pro (2016). Revitalizing CSDP: towards a comprehensive, realistic and credible defence in the EU. 11 Eylül 2016. http://club.bruxelles2.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/let-fra-all-defensefeuiileroute@fr160911en.pdf (10.06.2019).
  • Cebeci, M. (2018). AB’nin Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikalarında Güncel Tartışmalar. S. Baykal, S. A. Açıkmeşe, B. Akçay ve Ç. Erhan (Der.), ATAUM 30. Yıl Armağanı: Hukuki, Siyasi ve İktisadi Yönleriyle Avrupa Bütünleşmesinde Son Gelişmeler ve Türkiye-AB İlişkileri içinde (ss. 151-178). ATAUM: Ankara. Council of the EU (2017a). Notification on Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) to the Council and to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/31511/171113-pesco-notification.pdf (13.06.2019).
  • Council of the EU (2017b). Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2315 of 11 December 2017 establishing permanent structured cooperation (PESCO) and determining the list of participating Member States. Official Journal of the European Union. 14 Aralık 2017. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017D2315&from=EN (15.06.2019).
  • Council of the EU (2018a). Council decision establishing a common set of governance rules for PESCO projects Foreign Affairs Council meeting Luxembourg. 25 June 2018. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35786/council-decision-pesco-projects.pdf (10.06.2019).
  • Council of the EU (2018b). Council Decision of 6 March 2018 establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO, Brüksel. 6 Mart 2018. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/33065/st06393-en18-council-decision-pesco_press.pdf (12.06.2019).
  • Council of the EU (2018c). Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1797 of 19 November 2018 amending and updating Decision (CFSP) 2018/340 establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO. Brüksel. 19 Kasım 2018. http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13978-2018-INIT/en/pdf (12.06.2019).
  • Council of the EU (2018d). Council Conclusions on Security and Defence in the context of the EU Global Strategy - Council Conclusions (25 June 2018). http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10246-2018-INIT/en/pdf (13.06.2019).
  • Council of the EU (2019). Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO)'s projects – Overview. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/39348/table-pesco-projects.pdf (10.06.2019).
  • Council of the European Communities (1992). Treaty on European Union, Luxembourg.
  • Çayhan, E. B. (2002). Avrupa Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Türkiye. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, (3) 2002, 42-55.
  • EEAS (2017). Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD) Factsheet. 17 Kasım 2017. https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/coordinated_annual_review_on_defence_card_factsheet.pdf (15.06.2019).
  • Ekim, S. (2018). Europe in an Uncertain World: Values vs. Security Interests. Global Turkey in Europe, Documenti IAI 18.
  • European Commission (2017a). European Commission - Fact Sheet. Questions and Answers: the Future of European Defence. 7 Haziran 2017. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-1517_en.htm (16.06.2019).
  • European Commission (2017b). Speech by President Jean-Claude Juncker at the Defence and Security Conference Prague: In defence of Europe. Prag, 9 Haziran 2017.
  • European Commission (2017c). A European Defence Fund: €5.5 billion per year to boost Europe's defence capabilities. 7 Haziran 2017. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1508_en.htm (10.06.2019).
  • European Council (1999a). Presidency Conclusions, Cologne European Council. 3-4 Haziran 1999, 150/99 REV 1.
  • European Council (1999b). Presidency Conclusions, Helsinki European Council. 10-11 Aralık 1999. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21046/helsinki-european-council-presidency-conclusions.pdf (01.05.2019).
  • European Council (2013). European Council 19-20 December 2013 Conclusions. Brüksel. 20 Aralık 2013, EUCO 217/13. European Council (2016). European Council meeting (15 December 2016) – Conclusions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21929/15-euco-conclusions-final.pdf (01.07.2019).
  • European Council (2017). European Council meeting (22 and 23 June 2017)– Conclusions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/23985/22-23-euco-final-conclusions.pdf (01.07.2019).
  • European Parliament (2015). Flexibility Mechanisms in the Lisbon Treaty. Directorate General for Internal Policies. Study PE 536.474. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2015/536474/IPOL_STU(2015)536474_EN.pdf (10.06.2019).
  • Fiott, D., Missiroli, A. ve Tardy, T. (2017). Permanent Structured Cooperation: What’s in a name?. Chaillot Paper, No: 142.
  • Gov.UK. (2018). UK-France Summit 2018: documents. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-france-summit-2018-documents (01.08.2019).
  • Guerzoni, F. (2017). A European Integrated Force for an Ambitious Permanent Structured Cooperation. UEF Reflection Paper, Kasım 2017.
  • Haine, J-Y. (2004). ESDP: an overview. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
  • Hofmann, S. C. (2011). Why Institutional Overlap Matters: CSDP in the European Security Architecture. JCMS, 49 (1), 101-120.
  • Howorth, J. (2003). Saint Malo plus five: an interim assessment of ESDP. Notre Europe Policy Paper, Kasım 2003.
  • Howorth, J. (2019). European defence policy and subsidiarity: The imperative of the EU level. European View, 18 (1), 1-9.
  • Hynek, N. (2011). EU crisis management after the Lisbon Treaty: civil–military coordination and the future of the EU OHQ. European Security, 20 (1), 81-102.
  • Jopp, M. ve Schubert, J. (2019). Level-II-GSVP: neue Dynamik durch intergouvernementale Integration. Integration, 1 (2019), 37-54.
  • Koenig, N. ve Walter-Franke, M. (2017). France and Germany: Spearheading a European Security and Defense Union?. Jaques Delors Institute Berlin, Policy Paper No: 202.
  • Major, C. ve Mölling, C. (2014). The Framework Nations Concept: Germany’s contribution to a capable European defence. SWP Comment, 52/2014.
  • Marrone, A. (2017). Permanent Structured Cooperation: An Institutional Pathway for European Defence. IAI Commentaries: No. 17.
  • Marrone, A., Pirozzi, N. ve Paola, N. (2017). PESCO: An Ace in the Hand for European Defence?. Rome: IAI.
  • Martill, B. ve Sus, M. (2018). Post-Brexit EU/UK security cooperation: NATO, CSDP+, or ‘French connection’?. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20 (4), 1-18.
  • Menon, A. (2004). From Crisis to Catharsis: ESDP after Iraq. International Affairs, 80 (4), 631-648.
  • Menon, A. (2009). Empowering Paradise? The ESDP at Ten. International Affairs, 85 (2), 227-246.
  • Menon, A. (2011). European Defence Policy from Lisbon to Libya. Survival, 53 (3), 75-90.
  • Mills, C. (2018). EU defence: the realisation of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO). House of Commons Briefing Paper No: 8149.
  • Mills, C. (2019). The European Intervention Initiative (EII/EI2). House of Commons Briefing Paper No: 8432.
  • Official Journal of the European Union (2007). Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007, 2007/C 306/01.
  • Official Journal of the European Union (2008). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union - PROTOCOLS - Protocol (No 10) on permanent structured cooperation established by Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union, 09/05/2008 P. 0275 – 0277.
  • Özdal, B. (2008). Lizbon Reform Andlaşması’nın Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası’na İlişkin Düzenlemelerinin Analizi. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 4 (7), 125-161.
  • Présidence de la République (2017). Initiative for Europe. Speech by M. Emmanuel Macron, President of the French Republic. 26 Eylül 2017. https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/english_version_transcript_-_initiative_for_europe_-_speech_by_the_president_of_the_french_republic_cle8de628.pdf (10.08.2019).
  • Tardy, T. (2018). Does European defence really matter? Fortunes and misfortunes of the Common Security and Defence Policy. European Security, 27 (2), 119-137. Tocci, N. (2018). Towards a European Security and Defence Union: Was 2017 a Watershed?. JCMS, 56 (1), 131-141.
  • Turhan, E. (2018). Avrupa Birliği’nin Üçüncü Ülkelerle Harici Farklılaştırılmış Entegrasyon Modelleri ve Türkiye-AB İlişkilerinin Geleceği: Neoliberal Bir Yaklaşım. SİYASAL: Journal of Political Sciences, 29 (1), 95-120.
  • UK Parliament (2000). Text of Joint Declaration on European Defence, UK - French Summit. 3-4 Aralık 1998. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmdfence/264/26419.htm (05.06.2019).
  • WEU (1992). Petersberg Declaration. WEU Council of Ministers. 19 Haziran 1992. Bonn. http://www.weu.int/documents/920619peten.pdf (10.08.2019).
  • WEU (2019). Text of the Modified Brussels Treaty. http://www.weu.int/ (07.07.2019).
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-0027
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Dokuz Eylül Üniv. İşletme Fak.
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

MEASURING TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY OF TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY BASED ON ACCOUNTING DATA

Dursun BALKAN, Önder BELGİN

ÜRÜN SATIŞLARINDA UYGULANAN KITLIK MESAJLARININ VE FİYAT İNDİRİMLERİNİN SATIN ALMA İSTEKLİLİĞİNE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Kalender Özcan ATILGAN, Muharrem KÜÇÜKTALASLIO

DEĞİŞİM ALGISI: OTEL İŞLETMELERİ ÖRNEĞİ

Berrin GÜZEL, Ceren İŞÇİ

KALKINMAYI YENİDEN DÜŞÜNMEK: GÜNCEL TARTIŞMALAR VE SORULAR

Elif UZGÖREN

ENDÜSTRİ 4.0’A BÜTÜNCÜL BİR YAKLAŞIM: ÖRNEK OLAY ANALİZİ VE STRATEJİK YOL HARİTASI

Ömür Neczan TİMURCANDAY ÖZMEN, Engin Deniz ERİS, Pınar SÜRAL ÖZER, Hasan ZEREY

ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME YETENEĞİ: AMPİRİK ARAŞTIRMALAR ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Gizem YILMAZ KOZCU, Ömür Neczan TİMURCANDAY ÖZMEN

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN ORTAK GÜVENLİK VE SAVUNMA POLİTİKASI’NIN SAVUNMA BOYUTUNUN GELİŞİMİNDE PESCO’NUN ROLÜ: FIRSATLAR VE ZORLUKLAR

Ebru TURHAN

SOSYAL BİLİMLER ALANINDA ÇALIŞAN AKADEMİSYENLERİN YETKİNLİKLERİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Olca SÜRGEVİL, Buket KILIÇ, Ebru TOLAY

KESİTSEL ANOMALİLERİNİN BORSA İSTANBUL’DA TEST EDİLMESİ

Zahir DADAY, Sevinç GÜLER ÖZÇALIK

TÜRK İMALAT SANAYİ TOPLAM VERİMLİLİĞİNİN MUHASEBE VERİLERİNE DAYALI OLARAK ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Dursun BALKAN, Önder BELGİN