TÜRK İMALAT SANAYİ TOPLAM VERİMLİLİĞİNİN MUHASEBE VERİLERİNE DAYALI OLARAK ÖLÇÜLMESİ

Verimlilik, hem işletme düzeyinde hem de makroekonomik seviye için halen önemli bir performans ölçütüdür. Bu çalışma, temel muhasebe verilerini kullanan RAPMODS yöntemiyle 2006-2016 dönemleri arasında Türk imalat sanayisinin toplam verimlilik ölçümünün yapılmasına dayanmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda, toplam verimlilik ve kısmi verimlilik ölçütleri ile birlikte Türk imalat sanayinde verimlilik değişimlerinin kaynakları mali veriler üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, bu sonuçlara bağlı olarak potansiyel verimlilik iyileştirme alanları da ortaya konulmuştur.

MEASURING TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY OF TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY BASED ON ACCOUNTING DATA

Productivity is still an important performance measure for the firm level andmacroeconomic level. This study addresses total productivity measurement basedon RAPMODS using basic accounting data for Turkish manufacturing industry forthe period of 2006 to 2016. The results obtained from the analysis allows us tounderstand the total productivity and the source of the productivity changesrelated to partial productivities of the Turkish manufacturing industry.Furthermore, the potential productivity improvement areas are interpreted owingto these results.

___

  • Andai, S.O. (2015). Relationship Between Labour Practices and Firm Productivity in the Export Processing Zones in Kenya. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, PhD. Thesis, Jkuat, Kenya
  • Balinea, S. (2018). Measuring the Productivity of Commercial Banks Using RAPMODS. Mongolian Finance and Economy University MSc. Thesis, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
  • Demirtaş, U., Tokat, E. (2012). Measurement and Diagnosis in Productivity Management in Manufacturing SMEs: A Case Study. Journal of Productivity, 3, 7-38.
  • Ghalayini, A.M., Noble, J. S. (1996). The Changing Basis of Performance Measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 63-80.
  • Hannula, M. (2002). Total Productivity Measurement based on Partial Productivity Ratios. International Jornal of Production Economics, 78, 57-67.
  • Lilly, M., Obiajulu, U., Ogaji, S., & Probert, S. (2007). Total Productivity Analysis of a Nigerianpetroleum-Product Marketing Company. Applied Energy, 84, 1150-1173.
  • Porter, M. (1994). The Competitive Advance of Nations. London: The Macmillan Press.
  • Miller, D. M., & Rao, P. M. (1989). Analysis of Profit-Linked Total-Factor Productivity Measurement Models at the Firm Level. Management Science, 35(6), 757-767.
  • Özsever, Ç., Gençoğlu, T. And Erginel, N. (2009). The System Design for Monitoring Labour Productivity and Development Decision Support System. Journal of Science and Technology of Dumlupınar University, 18, 45-58.
  • Phusavat, K., and Photaranon, W. (2006). Productivity/Performance Measurement: Case Application at The Government Pharmaceutical Organization. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(9), 1272-1287.
  • Prokopenko, J. (1987). Productivity Management: A Practical Handbook. Geneva: International Labor Office.
  • Ramsay, M. R. (1973). Overall Productivity Measurement. First World Productivity Congress. Bombay: Indian Institute of Industrial Engineering.
  • Rao, M. P. (2006). A Performance Measurement System Using A ProfitLinked Multi-Factor Measurement Model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(3), 362-379.
  • Rao, M. P. (2007). From A Black Hole to A Hole-In-One. Management Accounting Quarterly, 8(2), 32-46.
  • Rao, M. P., and Miller, D. M. (2003). Expert Systems Applications for Productivity Analysis. Industrial Management & DataSystems, 104(9), 776-785.
  • Rao, M. P., Miller, D. M., and Lin, B. (2005). PET: An Expert System for Productivity Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 29, 300- 309.
  • Rao, M., & Mandal, P. (2012). Evaluating The Impact of It Investments: Use of A Multi-Period Profit-Linked Productivity Measurement Model. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 9(3), 278-294.
  • Rao, M., Chhabria, R., Gunasekaran, A., and Mandal, P. (2018). Improving Competitiveness Through Performance Evaluation Using The APC Model: A Case in Micro-Irrigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 1-11.
  • Sumanth, D.J. (1997). Total Productivity Management: A Systemic and Quantitative Approach to Compete in Quality, Price and Time. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Waters, W. G., & Tretheway, M. W. (1999). Comparing Total Factor Productivity and Price Performance: Concepts and Application to Canadian Railways. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 33(2), 209-220.
  • White, G. (1996). A Survey and Taxonomy of Strategy-Related Performance Measures for Manufacturing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(3), 42-61.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-0027
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: Dokuz Eylül Üniv. İşletme Fak.